• 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It essentially allows for special closed source builds. These closed source builds can have the engine support for consoles and still be in keeping with Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo’s licenses.

      • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t know that. How do the developers get access to these builds? Are they sold? Or do they need to build it themselves?

          • taanegl@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            This, right here.

            Hey EU. How about lowering that barrier to entry by pumping a couple of million Euro’s into cold-room reverse engineering the API’s and developing an open source alternative that can be distributed freely.

            We’ll invite Sony lawyers, Microsoft lawyers, watch them cope and seethe as their framework is made more open…

            …aaaand then realising that a lot more people will take the shot to pay for actual licensing. Go figure.

            • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re still going to need them to sign your binary for the console to recognize it as legit.

              Circumventing the official path worked back in the 80s and 90s, but modern consoles and their SDKs were designed with those lessons in mind.

              • 520@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s still valuable information for those that would seek to load homebrew (unsigned code) onto their systems.

                Console security is one of those things where every additional barrier helps. The goal isn’t to outright prevent homebrew or piracy but to limit the scope of breaches and delay them as much as possible. Even modern consoles like the Switch and PS5 are not immune

                • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It would be great if there was a guaranteed way to homebrew your consoles, but yeah security and stability is the real thing we benefit from. I don’t think anyone would advocate for more hackers in console multiplayer games, and I don’t want a homebrew game I’m running to crash or brick my system because of their fly-by-night hardware usage.

                  • 520@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    So, I didn’t bring up Xbox earlier, because Microsoft has an official way to run homebrew on Xbox consoles.

                    All modern Xboxes have access to something called developer mode. This allows people to put whatever code they like on it, but removes the ability to play retail games. The change isn’t permanent, however, and switching between the modes is perfectly safe.

                    This is a big part of the reason why Xbox 1 never had piracy; pirates couldn’t piggyback on the back of homebrewers, who simply opted to use developer mode instead of cracking the console.