- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
During an energy price crisis in 2022, similar taxes raised billions, the authors argue.
Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.euronews.com/green/2025/09/24/former-world-leaders-call-for-fossil-fuel-taxes-to-fund-global-climate-action
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.
One point where global taxation would make a lot of sense would be aviation fuel. It is tax-free due to an international treaty from 1940, and contributes a lot to pollution. Using such a tax for climate action items would be a double win!
It’s always former “leaders” that are calling for good policies. When they are in power they are happy to fuck everyone over.
It’s easier to say stuff because taking these sort of action is most of the time politically suicide, the opposition will drum it up as a bad move that hurt everyone. It take someone with very strong political will and leadership to put these sort of policies ahead.
I guess political suicide is worse than people dying because of climate inaction
/s
I mean, yeah, you can enact a radical policy, and then lose the next round to the right leaning party and then they retract back everything you enacted, making the overall result worst. Whoops.
Do you look around and think, “yup, right on track to success!”
I do look around and see a tons of idiots that will bring the country or even the world down so their status quo will not be affected. And i do see a lot of good policy being shot down because it challenged the status quo, and also do see political party falls because the good thing they do will only bear fruits a couples of years later. I’m actually seeing one happening the next election. I also witnessed a strong political party taking the back seat instead of taking more leadership role, because their skin colour and birthright doesn’t match the majority.
My opinion isn’t formed because i think we’re in a good spot, it’s formed based on what happened in reality.
It was a yes or a no question. Dodging it is kinda odd. Are you that kind of person who can’t answer a yes or no question because deep down it gives you pleasure not giving people what they want?
I don’t answer yes or no for complex question. Dense person tends to like complex thing boils down to just a yes or no, and i don’t take command from you. Why so hostile?
Our Carbon Benefit has been a tax-and-lift programme featuring heavily in national polling for the better part of a decade.
It’s a fossil fuel tax. It was pitched by a leader in power. “Always”? I think not.
Plot twist: the demented flatlanders were weaponized by their USA oil-barons via our conservative party, and it’s probably gonna be a memory after next election.
The earth won’t be fixed before I die. For some people that means they don’t support anything to blunt or (please god) revert the damage because they’re selfish. These are the people you’re voting against.
I think it’s unnecessary - renewables already grow as fast as it’s reasonably feasible