If you think that any comment I “oppose” is going to be one I remove, you’re in the wrong community. There are plenty that do operate that way, I will kindly recommend that you go try them instead, if that’s the Lemmy experience you are looking for. There are a lot. Trying to browbeat me into deleting the bad opinions from this community is not going to work, though, although I’m happy to spend at least a little time explaining to you why I operate that way (up to a point I guess).
Again human right abuses is not a matter of opinions, as a civilized and responsible admin you should remove comments justifying human right abuses.
I don’t expect you to remove any comments you oppose , i expect you to remove comments that justify human right abuses.
If you don’t think beating someone , interrupt their sleeps, deny them water for over 24h hours is not human right abuses please explain how they are not
i expect you to remove comments that justify human right abuses.
Why?
I have enough faith in Lemmy readers to be able to read a comment that justifies human rights abuses and manage to avoid thinking to themselves, “You know what, he’s got a point. It does make perfect sense to beat someone, interrupt their sleeps, deny them water for over 24 hours.” And, if there is someone out there who’s stupid enough to just believe and absorb anything they read in any random Lemmy comment, then I think having a variety of viewpoints good and bad, and also seeing some counterpoints, and over time coming to the realization that they shouldn’t just believe everything, and instead develop some tools for critical interpretation of what they read (and a viewpoint that’s been exposed to a lot of different things including some very bad ones), I think that’s probably the best way to educate that person out of it.
No, i expect a responsible admin to oppose justifying human right abuses and do their job of removing those victim blaming comments
If you think that any comment I “oppose” is going to be one I remove, you’re in the wrong community. There are plenty that do operate that way, I will kindly recommend that you go try them instead, if that’s the Lemmy experience you are looking for. There are a lot. Trying to browbeat me into deleting the bad opinions from this community is not going to work, though, although I’m happy to spend at least a little time explaining to you why I operate that way (up to a point I guess).
Again human right abuses is not a matter of opinions, as a civilized and responsible admin you should remove comments justifying human right abuses.
I don’t expect you to remove any comments you oppose , i expect you to remove comments that justify human right abuses.
If you don’t think beating someone , interrupt their sleeps, deny them water for over 24h hours is not human right abuses please explain how they are not
Why?
I have enough faith in Lemmy readers to be able to read a comment that justifies human rights abuses and manage to avoid thinking to themselves, “You know what, he’s got a point. It does make perfect sense to beat someone, interrupt their sleeps, deny them water for over 24 hours.” And, if there is someone out there who’s stupid enough to just believe and absorb anything they read in any random Lemmy comment, then I think having a variety of viewpoints good and bad, and also seeing some counterpoints, and over time coming to the realization that they shouldn’t just believe everything, and instead develop some tools for critical interpretation of what they read (and a viewpoint that’s been exposed to a lot of different things including some very bad ones), I think that’s probably the best way to educate that person out of it.
I can’t believe that i found an admin that is even dumber than jordanlund