• kriz@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i always hate this because its like…ok…but you are president now so just target it now.

    • philm@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but what’s the alternative?

      It’s a fucked up system we (in the industrial society) have. I would obviously want to have a different candidate that’s less influenced by lobby and rich people. But it’s not what the “system wants to have”…

  • Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “If you are seen as imposing debilitating regulations on heavy industry that employs large numbers of people, you’re not only going to get a backlash from manufacturing, but labor as well,” said David Axelrod, the Democratic strategist who ran former President Barack Obama’s campaigns. “How to do that without looking like you are stabbing these industries in the back, or in the front for that matter, is a real political challenge.”

    Godbless him he’s trying, but no… it’s not actually hard to get labor on board with this.

    Step 1: Consult labor leaders and make labor standards and union requirements for government contracts a part of the regulatory requirements.

    Step 2: Place barriers on outsourcing.

    That’s kind of it. You say, “We’re going to place new burdens on this industry!” and the executives say, “We’ll hold jobs hostage!” and you say “No… if you want to deal in US dollars, you’ll make it here, you’ll employ unionized workers, and you’ll smile and thank us for all the fucking money you’re making.”