Als guter Christ beharrt man auf dem Patriarchat und unterstützt den Erhalt vom Nachnamen, den der Ehemann mitbringt.

Moisturize me!

I wonder what you are referring to as well. Also ‘weaponizing discomfort’ sounds like something inappropriate while actually discomfort is a real thing and no one has to stand for it (in a certain degree). Not caring at all if you are causing others discomfort is the definition of selfishness. Recompensating somebody with a big tip, because you are a dick doesn’t make you less of a prick.

Die aktuelle “Alles gesagt”-Folge mit Annerorhilker kann ich auch sehr empfehlen: https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2025-11/anne-brorhilker-interviewpodcast-alles-gesagt

Probably depending on the country and according legislature, but as a pedestrian, I often wish for more scooters to take to the road as well. In most aspects they are very equivalent to bicycles and just as fast and dangerous. Worst of all are those scooter drivers who switch between road and sidewalk with every traffic light.

Huh, and I thought I needed a Microsoft account, but this way I could maybe even use for the computers at work. Thanks!

Yes, there is. Why deny something without checking, elaborating or citing a source? Sure, it is fun to doubt anybody is ever saying true things on the Internet, but denying a fact just because you do not know it yet, is misinformation in itself.

Beautifully carved! Just to be certain though: This is about Outer Wilds - Echoes of the Eye, right?

Im felinen Haustier.

I have seen this (or a very similar) picture about five years ago and have thought about it nearly every time I heard the name Radcliffe. I am very thankful that you posted it here and I can finally save it as a reference.

So haben wir es eigentlich alle gelernt, und ich kenne IRL echt niemanden, der sich von der Grundform nicht angesprochen fühlt - weder Männer noch Frauen.

Also ich kenne schon einige Leute, die sich nicht vom lange etablierten generischen Maskulinum angesprochen fühlen. Und bezüglich dessen, was “wir alle eigentlich gelernt haben”, wurd mir auch schon in der Grundschule das Gendern mittels Binnen-I nahe gelegt. Aber klar, wenn man seine eigene Filterblase als Repräsentation der gesamten Gesellschaft annimmt,

kommen dann so Kommentare wie deiner bei raus.

Thanks for giving this reference! The book is out of print, but high-resolution scans can be downloaded here for free, which is endorsed by the original author apparently.

I’m not sure if I love how much I hate this or the other way around.

Why did you have to do that? Please don’t tell me they turned out to be terrible people actually (do tell if they are though)

It is also very hard to have a realistic estimation of how much work your partner is actually doing, because obviously they are doing it and not you. So it is somewhat obscure to you and their share appears smaller to you. If you want to share work equally you should be prepared to do what you perceive as ~70% of the work load.

On another note: I feel like yard work is a strange example because in most cases work in the garden is a rather voluntary thing. Nothing bad usually happens if a garden is neglected a bit, unless you are relying on it for produce. Granted, things can overgrow, maybe a bush is removed rather sooner than later, but the household is just a huge never ending chain of responsibilities and important garden work is rather sporadic. Household work just needs to be done to ensure there is food on the table and clean clothes in the wardrobe.

Similar alots stem from this blog from 2010

The origin of the alot is the blog hyperbole and a half, this article in particular. It is very cute tbh. I don’t find it hard to believe that somebody drew this particular alot in response later on.

Thanks for the read!

I love your enthusiasm! But as someone who works in semiconductor development, I feel a bit like it is time to abandon this branch of the technology tree for now again. Maybe I am just disheartened from the PhD stress, but where does it really lead to right now? Following up on Moore’s Law right now just seems to promise higher efficiency and lower electricity demands while actually that is mainly greenwashing attempt IMO (lower resolution technologies are more energy and resurce efficient when considering resource demand during production; high device density leads usually to increase of the number of transistors which are operated parallely, so while the single FET is more efficient in dynamic operation, the whole chip might have much higher leakage). At the same time this efficiency is used as justification to just increase the calculation load whithout considering if it is useful (e.g. LLMs). Resources might be better allocated for More than Moore/architectural approaches e.g. for neuromorphic computing to actually reduce the immense AI computing load coming up.

Sorry for the rant, I think I gotta quit my job.

I tried this with zeroPi and jellyfin, bit the Pi seemed constantly overwhelmed with displaying videos, so I got about a frame every 2 seconds (might have been a pi3b). Have you got any clue what the issue might be? It depended a lot on the particular file I wanted to play as well though, but I wasn’t able to find a pattern. Of two matroska/mp4 files one worked well, the other stuttered as hell.