Based on the look on her face, I think his rizz may be working on her.

Oh, shut up LiniageOS will be stone dead any moment now.

Even 38% of people falling for this shit is too damn high.

I held onto jailbreaking till the end. I have a iPhone on iOS 17.0 and TrollStore for permanent sideloaded apps. It’s pretty awesome! There hasn’t been anything like a jailbreak or TrollStore since then. I wish I had bought an iPhone 15 on iOS 17.0 at launch so I could hold onto this as long as possible. Having a lower end iPhone I’ll probably need an upgrade in the next year or so.

You can get a similar experience to TrollStore by paying for an Apple developer account or a third-party signing service that abuses Apple developer accounts. It seems android users may have to do a similar thing in a few years.

This is the most braindead comment I’ve read here yet.

OP’s, comment is the most fire comment on this platform.

Stop buying into the propaganda the DNC puts out. The DNC platform can say whatever the fuck it wants they don’t actually do any of it when they get in power. When have they ever actually fought for the things in their party platform?

Fact: Unless you’re 80+ years old, you’ve never seen a Democratic Party like that. 

Ironically, Eisenhower, a Republican was the last administration to do anything approaching what the Democratic Party platform says.  Stop lapping up propaganda and look at reality.

We have the largest prison system in the world per capita four times over. You can thank senator Joe Biden for that. We’re already the United prison systems of America.

Yeah, I recently discovered Tad Stoermer. Everything he posts is great!

It’s like these people have never heard of Shays’s rebellion or the whisky rebellion. This is exactly what American presidents do and it goes further than Shays’s rebellion. Liberals need to learn nationalist myths will not save us.

When in human history did conquerers not also take slaves from those they conquered?

As far as I understand, the practice goes back to the Akkadian empire. I’m not saying taking slaves is good or natural. The thing I see as problematic from your assertion; is that slavery was at any time in human history a form of progress. I don’t see any reason to make such concessions to the right.

If they want to paint themselves in apologia for slavery, we should mock them for it.

(Edit: Which to your credit, is what your meme is doing.)

Neoliberalism was born in Chile Neoliberalism will die in Chile!

I’m not saying the article doesn’t make some good points. But, much of it is self-contradictory. It says in the beginning of the article that we can rule out progressive appeals to voters as it was the more moderate voters that stayed home. By the end of the article its saying democrats need to appeal to voters by telling them how they will materially improve the lives of working people.

Focusing on how politics can improve lives of working people materially is literally a progressive appeal.

Population: Chengdu over 20 million vs. under 3 million in Toronto.

The maps above also seem to be differently scaled.

Also, the fact that Chengdu’s metro has developed fast in the past decades, as compared to Canada that has developed steadily in the past century, is not really the gotcha OP seems to imply it is.

That said, it’s perfectly possible that public transport in Toronto leaves much to be desired - without pointlessly comparing it to Chengdu.

All that is true, but the point I made stands. Public transit is better in China and that’s a fair thing to point out.

If you’re upset that China has better public transit, the proper response is to advocate for better public transit. Not to whine that you’re being compared to countries that have better public transit.

Public transit is in fact better in China. In fact public transit in China is considered some of the best in the world at this point. Pointing out a particular ways in which a communist country is better than most capitalist countries is informationally valuable, and vice versa. That’s called a nuanced understanding of the differences.

You asserting things can’t be better in China is pointlessly political. Some things are better in China, some things are worse.

Westerners are so propagandized they’ll literally argue with a map.

Wow, a broken clock that is still always right!

For Apple and other phone manufacturers battery replacements is a point where they can pressure people to upgrade. China has developed a new battery tech with about twice the capacity of standard lithium batteries. When that becomes standard in phones they want people ro be used to the idea of buying half the phone for the same price. Personally, I would prefer 2 day battery life on a full charge if there is a new technology that doubles battery capacity. At best Apple is likely to to keep that in the ‘Pro’ phones until there are $300 android phones with the technology.

Damn zoomers don’t understand us 90s kids. Get off my lawn.

deleted by creator

Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.

I would agree no country is perfect with regards to being completely anti-imperialist. All nation-states have an interest in building empire.

Having said that just because we live in a world that incentives competition between nation-states, that does not mean the world as is, is inevitable or eternal. Just because an ideal doesn’t exist, doesn’t mean it’s not an ideal worth striving for. Things can change and it is worth striving towards a world with better human relations.

Having said that, some examples of more positive relations do exist.

One could point to the international healthcare initiatives from Cuba as a positive example of non-imperialist relations to aspire towards.

While China is far from perfect, they have made small positive steps with the Belt and Road Initiative by offering better terms to developing countries than historical international investments initiatives such as the IMF and the World Bank. If leaders in western liberal democracies want to compete with China and offer developing countries terms with even better environmental and labor standards for mining operations or otherwise; I view that as an unmitigated win for human relations.

Unfortunately, from where I’m sitting, it seems like leaders in western liberal democracies are more interested in competing with China in military terms rather than in labor or environmental terms.

The secret is you gotta get ‘em in the freezer before they go soggy.