The writing is seriously good. I enjoy just reading random furniture descriptions.
The only reason I haven’t beaten it yet is that it feels repetitive since the main story and certain profitable side quests are always the same.
While some RNG like the faction relationships add great and flavorful variety, others like the medicine recipes are technically different every time but it doesn’t matter.
Der KI ist nicht giftig.
Stromverbrauch ist auch kein Thema obwohl man auf Lemmy anders meint. Die neuen modelle herstellen verbraucht 1 GW, kann man aber nichts gegen machen, die Singularitätsreligion ist zu stark. Modelle benutzen ist billig.
Maybe it is different elsewhere but according to my calculations, renting property is not very profitable. Investing in stocks is better if you only want to make money and do not care about the apartment otherwise.
You can’t easily get your money out of the property and if loan rates go up, you pay more and the property value goes down.
The real parasite is the bank who takes a cut but has little risk as the money it lends out is created from thin air.
My guess would be that using a desktop computer to make the queries and read the results consumes more power than the LLM, at least in the case of quickly answering models.
The expensive part is training a model but usage is most likely not sold at a loss, so it can’t use an unreasonable amount of energy.
Instead of this ridiculous energy argument, we should focus on the fact that AI (and other products that money is thrown at) aren’t actually that useful but companies control the narrative. AI is particularly successful here with every CEO wanting in on it and people afraid it is so good it will end the world.
It is easy to come up with nonsense. I much more respect works that explore the consequences of one fantastical thing.
These at least show up when logged in but are there ones that you can’t see at all without VPN?
I did enjoy World though it involved a lot of interacting with bad UI and walking to a monster. Can’t really complain about grind, as you don’t have to fight the same monster too much. The story cutscenes and missions were painfully bad.
What I did like was fighting one big enemy rather that hordes of small ones, having to be close and it being risky, exotic weapon movesets. It is great that you can and do use the environment to your advantage all the time.
I would like to see a game that does the fighting big enemies in terrain but with more physics based attacks. The hitbox-based combat where you can put your hammer inside the beast and then swing feels silly.
I didn’t like the equipment upgrades much as they only get interesting late in the game and all weapons of the same base type are essentially the same.
ME is a relatively bland shooter IMO.
On KotOR you may be missing the point. It barely has any gameplay. Combat is pretty easy and over quickly. The point of anything in that game is storytelling and fun quests, the mechanics are just good enough to not get in your way too much.
One thing to note is that many people agree that Taris sucks because it is mostly linear and the fun quests only start when the game opens up. Taris may be necessary to set up the plot, though.
Plant varieties are essentially inbred, so to get strong but still predictable plants, you need to cross two varieties that have some genetic distance.
The plants resulting from a cross are called F1. F1 seeds are comparatively expensive because of the effort required to make them. (Still, they are very cheap compared to other expenses.)
If the storebought peppers are F1 then their seeds are F2 and will be a random combination of parent traits instead of the perfectly predictable F1.
Another reason to buy seed is that you can grow much more interesting peppers. For instance beautiful purple striped Blot peppers or tasty Jimmy Nardellos.
We still have a lot of roofs that could have solar on them. Scaling up nuclear will deplete fuel mines faster because the isotopes that are legal due to arms treaties are pretty limited.
I’m not claiming that electric transmission is more efficient always because it isn’t. But as you say it is close.
In a scenario where a train drives at a constant speed forever, attaching the engine to the wheels directly is a clear winner.
However, with varying torque requirements, an ICE can’t always operate at maximum efficiency. They are especially bad at starting from a standstill. You can get a good overview of the concept from this wiki article. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_band
We are comparing attaching a diesel engine via a gearbox to attaching it via generator and electric speed controller.
Electrically driven wheels can deliver just the right amount of power at over 95% efficiency. Direct ICE suffers because it cannot always run the engine in ideal conditions, reducing its efficiency.
We do this in locomotives but not in cars because cars need to be lightweight. Actually, nuclear is clearly the best vehicle propulsion, almost infinite range and high power. It is only used in ships due to its weight.
The tire thing is completely made up. Yes, they sell their premium tires but they are not necessary and do not contain electronics. https://www.tesla.com/support/tires
You are arguing a side rather than looking at facts.
You are correct that it is best to have a lightweight car if you have to have one. But an electric one does take over in environmental cost relative quickly and is cheaper in countries that don’t subsidize fossil fuels and tax emissions. In addition the air quality in cities improves.
Everything automatically updates if you use Linux…
Also, it is relatively easy to understand conflicts happening near you. People take very strong stances on faraway conflicts even though it is hard to know what is actually going on, especially in issues that there is a lot of propaganda or polarized opinions about. You’d have to do a few days’ research to have a chance to understand some complex faraway problem.
Agreed except for R. That language’s documentation and semantics are painful. Not Malbolge but reminds me of PHP and BASICs with weird limitations.
Not really hidden, though. Often Linux distros even have gcc preinstalled.
Will it stay around? Yes, because it allows writing performant software as our CPUs and compilers are made for it and performance does matter very often.
On the other hand, Rust is being used even in the Linux kernel now. It lets you do the same things as C, so the only thing holding it back right now are the lack of some more exotic C extensions like guaranteed tail calls / computed goto.
For an actually hidden language, try Mercury. It is not famous or widely used and its tooling is not quick to get started with. However, it will definitely broaden your horizons much more than C, which is similar to all the mainstream languages.
It is the best on the market but unfortunately they just use Google underneath plus their own blog index. And at least to me it seems it isn’t going in a better direction.
The US sounds extremely expensive. In the EU 1500$ a month will pay for a very nice apartment close to work.
Oof. Mechanicus starts out ok, even has some cool mechanics but then gets utterly trivial and just keeps going like that.
Are you playing modded Xcom? I enjoyed a run with amalgamation classes, gem-based psi and lots of mods to make the enemies harder but it has been shelved for a while because the Humanity’s requiem Mutons are too much to take on and I need to think about how much to sacrifice to pass missions until my weapon upgrade finishes.