• Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Not asking about the morality, asking whether or not the people making this argument on piracy consider jumping the turnstile to be theft, in the most practical sense. Not in an ideal world, but in the real world, would you consider that theft?

    A turnstile jumper is also exploiting the products and services produced by offers without paying the cost to use them. Nothing is being “removed” in that situation either.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What would you call taking or using something without paying for it, then? Resources are still being spent to transport the person who has not paid for them.

          • Chozo
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            The transportation authority who maintains the trains and stations.

            • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Only if the rides are a scarce resource. Which they aren’t. Nothing that some customer could have bought is removed by jumping a turnstyle.

              • Chozo
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Nothing that some customer could have bought is removed by jumping a turnstyle.

                Nothing? Not even the fuel required to transport the extra weight of somebody who hasn’t paid? Not even the wages for the employees who conduct and maintain the trains?

                You can argue that the amounts are miniscule, sure. But “miniscule” does not equal “zero”.

                • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  When you’re paying, you’re not buying the fuel nor are the salaries directly affected by one person is paying for riding a train.

                  What you’re describing is called “marginal cost” and reducing this is the reason why the economics of any large scale business is actually working. You could argue with these marginal costs, but you’d be entering a completely different model/domain of economics. And no one uses this model which is abstract/non-abstract in any aspect that happens to make your point valid.

            • Vodulas [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I think I figured out the disconnect here. Yes, hopping a turnstile is against the law. It is still not considered theft. It is called fare evasion, and it is more akin to a traffic violation. The reason I was confused, and why I assumed you meant morality, is that nobody is saying piracy isn’t against the law. The article never said that either.

    • Unaware7013
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Jumping a turnstile and taking a physical, actually scarce resource is not comparable to duplicating a digital, artificially scarce resource.

      The train requires ongoing maintenance and can only hold a finite amount of people. Taking the train seat for free takes away something from another person. Downloading media does not use any ongoing resources, and does not take anything away from another consumer.

      Comparing the morality of physical goods to digital goods are not really a good comparison specifically because of the artificial scarcity brought on by making something digital to try to make it more expensive doesn’t map to the real scarcity of physical goods.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Again, I have to ask: How do you think those digital goods are made in the first place? Somebody labored to create it. They deserve to be paid for it.

        Not sure why this is such a hot take.

        • @mkhoury@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          How much should they be paid for it? In a situation where the streaming services have a stranglehold on the market and are extracting a big amount in rent-seeking price vs actually paying the people who labored to create it, should we continue to pay and give in to their morally dubious tactics? In this lens, can piracy be considered a form of civil disobedience?

          • Chozo
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            How much should they be paid for it?

            However much they’re asking. They put a price tag on it for exactly this question.

            In this lens, can piracy be considered a form of civil disobedience?

            Not really. Civil disobedience is about refusing to follow a law, not choosing to break a law. There’s a difference between the two concepts; one involves going about your day as normal and ignoring laws, and the other is going out of your way to break a law. Piracy is no more a form of civil disobedience than looting a grocery store is.

            • @mkhoury@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Ah, that’s not my understanding of civil disobedience. I prefer this definition: “civil disobedience is a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies” (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-disobedience/)

              I suppose the piracy aspect might not be public enough to count as civil disobedience though, unless you count as public the noticeable cumulative effects of all piracy.

              • Chozo
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Right, but in this instance you’re not damaging the government through these actions. You’re damaging private entities. Civil vs criminal.

                EDIT: Although, piracy often crosses both civil and criminal statutes in many cases, because copyright law is weird like that.

                • @mkhoury@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Agreed, and to me the solution is not “let’s hope the companies play nice”, but rather to bring in anti-monopoly regulations, like Canada’s Bill C-56.

                  We need to force companies to add interoperability, transparency and fairness imho. Like the ongoing fight to force Apple to allow competing browsers in iOS. Or alternate app stores for Android and iOS.