• @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    No, nothing was lost when the copy was acquired, because copying does not remove the original. Literally, nothing is lost.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lost sales are considered damages, so yes something is lost.

      EDIT: This is worse than arguing with SovCits.

      • @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bruh, no one in here is arguing about legality, we’re arguing about morality, and no one but corporate shills buy into “potential sales” having value.

        You’re trying to argue against what people just fundamentally, intuitively understand; copyright is a legal construct (not a moral one) that is 99% bullshit.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Bruh, no one in here is arguing about legality

          What are you talking about? That’s literally the entire point of the article and this comment section.

          • @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            Now you’re the one being obtuse, unless you’re claiming that you’re actually arguing that you can be charged with theft, which you can’t be, because legally, copyright infringement isn’t theft.

          • ripcord
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Yes, but then everyone started talking about morality.