It seems quite… minimalist at the moment. And it doesn’t seem to take any notice of the instance in the config file. Seems okay otherwise. I think I’d prefer an emacs version, maybe with gnus as the front-end, to be honest.
“Minimalist” wasn’t a criticism, just a comment really. It’s odd that I can’t see who posted what though.
I don’t have a github account so can’t create a ticket there. Basically I assumed that since the config contained the instance name (URL? I forget), that would be picked up in the absence of an instance on the command line and it would connect to that automatically.
It seems quite… minimalist at the moment. And it doesn’t seem to take any notice of the instance in the config file. Seems okay otherwise. I think I’d prefer an emacs version, maybe with gnus as the front-end, to be honest.
It’s supposed to be minimalist (as in very less metadata), the ui is just a placeholder it will be polished once the core logic is done,
Please open a issue on github on how to improve the config I didn’t put a lot of thought into it becuase I wanted to prioritize another issue
“Minimalist” wasn’t a criticism, just a comment really. It’s odd that I can’t see who posted what though.
I don’t have a github account so can’t create a ticket there. Basically I assumed that since the config contained the instance name (URL? I forget), that would be picked up in the absence of an instance on the command line and it would connect to that automatically.