• SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    Back when computers were so big and expensive, it made more sense to essentially use cloud computing rather than try to cram a nav system inside the car.

        • lemmyman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 days ago

          Definitely “radio frequency” in the electromagnetic sense but not in the common “radio station you can tune to in a car” sense

          • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            Same as in this image. It even says that the signal would be automatically processed by a computer.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      I mean everything wireless is. Even a wired lightbulb can be said to emit “radio waves”… Depending on your definition.

      I mean not exactly but light and radio ARE the same thing just with different frequency.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    An antenna embedded in the road? For every intersection in the country? I can’t fathom how much that would have cost.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Most intersections already have powerlines to them, and a large number also have stop lights. The cost would be a very large number, but compared to the costs we have already spent on the intersection and getting power to it the costs is trivial.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        For this system to be practical at all, the antennas would need to be placed well ahead of the intersection or exit/entrance ramp, in order to allow drivers time to get the message and safely prepare to turn. So not at every intersection, for every intersection. Multiple times for all the directions of traffic that would need to use it.

      • n7gifmdn@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        not to mention this was touted as being exclusive to one company or another. WTF is going to pay for that.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Most rural intersection have zero power, and if they do its solar.

        Where are you that rural intersections have power? Because it can’t be NA.

        • n7gifmdn@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I have family who lives where the State still hasn’t even bothered to put up stop lights.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Power lines run along most rural roads. At least where I have seen rural roads. A few don’t have them but in my experience most do. Of course it is whatever voltage the power lines are at, to use it you need a transformer, meter, circuit breakers and whatever.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            They won’t even put up lights to make the intersections safe or traffic lights, even though there is “power” and you think they’ll do this? Do I have a bridge to sell you….

            There’s a reason those lines aren’t already tapped dude. As I said, they actually use solar for powered stuff when needed, although those lines are there. Just because there’s lines, does in no way mean the intersection is powered. Where did you get this information from?

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              I never said this was practical. It was an idea that it appears they never tried to make work in the 1960s (guessing age here). It is questionable if it could have been made to work with the technology of the day.

              lack of power is not a reason it couldn’t have worked.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          You wouldn’t need to install an antenna at every single intersection. A town with zero stoplights is going to be tiny as fuck and everyone will know how to get to the closest highway. From there the route can be established using a roadside antenna.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Tbf, in 1969 I-80 (which would be the majority of the interstate route between Chicago and LA) wasnt remotely finished yet. It wasnt completed until 1986, with the last stretch being finished west of SLC. So in 1969 if you wanted to drive between Chicago and LA, at multiple points you would have not been on an interstate. And most of those points would have been in major urban centers that would have been fairly complicated to navigate if you didnt know them. This hypothetical nav system would have been much easier than whipping out a national road map to figure out how to get from one finished part of the interstate to another when passing through SLC

  • Doolbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    All I wanted was a HUD for GPS. I’m sure they have it, but when I drove truck i couldn’t find it.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I stand by, give me Bluetooth from my phone to glasses with the ability to stream hud for GPS and translation/captions and this would be moderately popular. Treat it like the visual version of Bluetooth headphones rather than something special.

      I want to move from the phone as it is to it as the personal mobile computation hub it’s clearly headed towards. Give me computation square that’s normally kept in mobile screen but can be put in car or in motorcycle helmet or in desktop computer

  • youngalfred@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Does that display show “then second right” but the lit up arrow is 2nd left?

      • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Using lasers for satellite communication is hot new thing right now actually. Although not for navigation, lasers’ advantages (bandwidth) are not relevant there.