• ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    200 years ago people also had kids quite late.

    And we live so much longer than even 40 years ago. Life is so much better and safer now.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        And at 40 and 45, since there wasn’t birth control.

        I was honestly surprised when I looked at a genealogy site, so many of my ancestresses got married at 28-30, I guess reading Little House on the Prairie when I was a kid made me think all those women of old times married young but nope, that did not seem to be the case.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      But the nuclear family is much younger, so today’s kids rely much more heavily and directly on their parents with respect to kids 200 years ago. The “village” build around multigenerational housing has disappeared, making the age of parents a much bigger factor than earlier on