• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’d be far happier if they just shut down chat under 18. The pedos will find a way to get through otherwise.

    • atthecoast@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Parents can turn off chat in the parental controls. Then I found my daughter chatting using the handheld “protest signs” in game that have customizable text…

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          i mean, to matter which way you go you’ll have created a database of people’s real identities. which is a problem.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  hah.

                  personally i think a big part of the problem is that real-name identification for things that shouldn’t need it is just sort of accepted, rather than being criticised as the massive invasion of privacy that it is. whether it includes children or not is a side note in my mind.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        While I don’t love age verification, taking 3d webcam scans from adults won’t create a catalog of kids.

        edit: and to clarify, IDGAF about chat ID verifications for almost all sites, but Roblox is marketed explicitly toward and occupied by children.

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          no amount of age verification/id controls is stopping bad parents from failing their kids, it’s a pointless waste of time which ultimately opens up these kids/people to being even more vulnerable when somebody hacks their database.

          if you run a business that provides some digital entertainment service to children, and facilitates their communication while using it…the only way your stopping groomers (or just generally keeping it from turning into a cesspool) is by actually paying people to moderate the chat rooms, simple as that

          and, atleast in an unregulated shithole like the US…the only way they’ll do that is if they end up being held liable under some class action lawsuit

          small communities like this are work because the population using it is still relatively small

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          either way you’re creating a database of people’s faces. it’s gonna be handled by a third party no matter what so whether you’re above or below the cutoff is just a flag.

    • unalivejoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I would be willing to verify my age if it meant I didn’t have to play with children.