President Donald Trump on Thursday assailed Democratic lawmakers who told members of U.S. military they must refuse any illegal orders, calling them traitors who should face execution.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251120174004/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-democrats-who-told-us-military-refuse-illegal-orders-deserve-death-2025-11-20/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Per the same Uniform Code of Military Justice all orders are lawful until military court deems them unlawful.

    Only military court can determine the order to be illegal and until that determination is made months later the military can apply all the sactions against you (no pay, solitary confinment, loss of rank, etc.). Following orders even illegal ones is also an affimative defense for any crimes. It’s all by design as US learned from Nuremberg trials.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Cool cool cool cool.

      “Ok troops, we’re taking this list of registered Democrats and killing them all.”

      Military court:

      “Are you insane? Of course that’s no-…”

      (Judge removed)

      “New judge, can you take Trump’s dick out of your mouth so you can rule on this?”

      “Yep. All good here. That was a lawful order, hope you carried it out completely.”

      • Solano@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        As ridiculous as that sounds, yes, this is to be expected. They already weakened the military courts, but I don’t know the extent, just remember there were some articles about it earlier in the year. Also, I don’t know if history has an example of any large groups of military refusing an order, not counting coups.

    • Talaraine@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’d like for you to point that part out, as the only other reference is here:

      From the commentary/guidance for Article 92:

      “An order is presumed lawful. … A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders …”

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Again, order can be ruled illegal later, but until the military court makes that determination, you will be held in breach of UCMJ for refusing to obey an order.
        If you have some time listen to https://youtu.be/TwPLqGkYnBA where an actual JAG explains it better than I can.

        • Talaraine@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          So the Nuremburg trials still hold fast as an example here. A soldier can make the determination to undergo potential courtmartial, or he can avoid the death squad. I know which one I’d pick. We don’t have mindless soldiers in our military.

          If an order violates the law, they are wise to disobey, just as I said.

          No matter who you are or what the situation is, the ‘right thing’ just might come with a price, and a good person is simply willing to pay it.