Re-posted since LW removed it…

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/2610169

Jared Birchall is Elon Musk’s right hand man. He controls Elon Musk’s family foundation and is in charge of hiring bodyguards to protect Elon. He is one of the very few people that Elon Musk trusts.

With his wife Laura, he lives in Austin, Texas.

According to public documents, they are located at 16715, Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421.

[Original image of family removed]

Donald Trump falsely said migrant families living in Springfield, Ohio, were stealing pets and eating cats and dogs.

Elon Musk amplified these lies on X.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/media/elon-musk-trump-rally-bomb-election-misinformation

As a result, these families received thousands death threats.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/nx-s1-5114047/springfield-ohio-haitian-migrants-trump-safety-concerns

Jared Birchall laughed about it. He absolutely loved it. His lovely wife Laura Birchall thought this was very funny.

Jared is obsessed about his privacy. He doesn’t want anyone to know who he is.

“Why are you posting their picture?”

Free speech absolutism baby.

I don’t owe them shit.

  • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fucking love this new shit.

    They really shouldnt scrutinize if they don’t want to be scrutinized

    They didn’t and don’t obey the spirit of law, or worry about how what they do effects others, other peoples feelings, or even obey the actual fucking law itself if they don’t think they have to

    So I dont believe that overthinking these things is necessary when considering what to do about the people themselves or the problems that are created as a result.

    This isn’t to say don’t obey the law but is def to say not to worry about how it might appear to some instead of how it actually is

    Resisting within the confines of the system when you can makes good sense, and this is that in fucking SPADES duder

    Bravo whoever you are, and thank you

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They make every device we own spy on us in our own homes but don’t want us to know anything about their life. Fuck these psychopaths asshats.

  • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    I will always maintain that assassinating well-known or infamous figureheads is a worthless strategem. At best, it’s merely symbolic, at worst it’s likely to backfire spectacularly - and it achieves very little in reality because you’re not actually doing any structural damage to the hierarchy involved.

    Their right-hand henchmen, the people these figureheads rely on to get anything done and usually remain hidden in the shadows, on the other hand…

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      In theory you are right yet history has shown dramatic political progress after assassinations.

      UnitedHealthcare immediately changed their policies after the assassination.

      • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        yet history has shown dramatic political progress after assassinations.

        History shows that poorly-thought out assassination attempts backfire far more than they succeed at achieving anything good. I can point at assassinations like Dmitri Tsafendas (an anarchist) stabbing Hendrik Verwoerd as an attempt that achieved absolutely nothing, and at Alexander Berkman (another anarchist) shooting Henry Clay Frick as an attempt that backfired disasterously on anarchists at the time.

        Brian Thompson’s assassination should be an important case study for radicals when it comes to the use of targeted lethal force. For one, Thompson was an unknown - not a well-known personality like (for instance) Charlie Kirk. Second, Mangione’s motives was not overtly political - a very important factor in his subsequent lionisation. This is why Thompson’s demise could not be used as political theatre by liberals and fascists in the way that they used Kirk’s.

        (I am aware that Kirk wasn’t assassinated by a leftist, but that’s neither here nor there when it comes to this question)

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          What do you mean by “not overtly political”? I feel like I disagree with you on that point, but I suspect that might be because I’m not understanding your meaning here

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            What do you mean by “not overtly political”?

            Mangione’s grievance with Big Healthcare was seen as personal - ie, he didn’t make any attempt to justify it with an overtly political narrative that could only be seen as abstract by the general public.

            Leftists forget that the general public does not conflate the personal with the political. That is why the general public lionised Luigi Mangione and completely ignored Aaron Bushnell.

            It is not a trivial thing, unfortunately.

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I will always maintain that assassinating well-known or infamous figureheads is a worthless strategem. At best, it’s merely symbolic, at worst it’s likely to backfire spectacularly - and it achieves very little in reality because you’re not actually doing any structural damage to the hierarchy involved.

      we have about a thousand years of history showing you’re right

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah there’s no obligation to decorum or fair play here. I think maybe its mate’s image would also be a perfectly fair perfectly lovely thing to post.

      I’m not too upset about including its spawn, but I get the argument for cropping them out.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not at all upset, the same courtesy is not extended to us. Fuck 'em. Its about time we start getting dirty or die. Mother Nature ain’t gonna wait around too much longer before she cans this run and starts again.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      My impression is lemmy-world is pretty conservative. Not in a maga-hat “kill the queers” way, but in the “respectable” “don’t rock the boat even if people are drowning” kind of way.

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would guess that it was for “doxxing” even though every bit of information provided is public record.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t you dare post public info about the people who actively want to kill you and your family! That makes you as bad as the rich assholes who would kill you themselves if they could.

      That’s why. .world protects fascists.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I actually hope it’s just that. Remember that powerful people who try to hide their identities, will wield their power. Let’s hope we don’t become a target.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re doing a bad job hiding it when it’s public info you can find on google in a few seconds. But we won’t, they’re too busy being fascist dickwads to care about us.

    • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They have rules against doxxing and also against anything illegal in NL iirc. Inciting violence is illegal there so people saying he should get killed is a no go there (which is what happened in the comments).

      Was a whole big thing after united health’s CEO was killed. You couldn’t say he deserved it or anything. Within a day or two they clarified that you could comment on things that already occurred (like united health ceo) but you couldn’t say stuff like so-and-so should be next.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Inciting violence is illegal there so people saying he should get killed is a no go

        When the Right incites violence against the Left, LW amplifies the message because it’s “news”. When a Left user does it LW deletes it.

          • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Its not stochastic terrorism. Were not calling him a pedophile or a vampire. Nobody’s calling for him to be killed. We’re just Annoying him with our eyes.

            Fox news has done worse literally every single day since 2008, and the fcc, back when that existed, never gave a single fuck.

        • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Posting a person’s address, picture, full name, and a list of personal faults that is supported by evidence which would likely cause people to reach out and contact the person over their actions.

          Doxxing is “posting private or identifying information about an individual without the person’s consent, usually with malicious intent”.

          So yeah, without the intent but it could be considered doxxing.

          Unless you have some actual evidence or a counter argument to make instead of “nuh uh”?

          • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I just think it’s important for folks to know they have a fascist living in their community, similar to how a pedophile register works. For the record, I don’t wish any physical harm to come to him. I just think its important to expose and keep an eye on fascists who do wish harm on whole swathes of society. Much as fascists don’t give a damn about the privacy of regular citizens who might oppose their plans (e.g. ICE using Flock cameras for domestic surveillance, or basically anything the NSA does), I don’t see why rich fascists should get special consideration wrt their privacy, especially when it comes to publicly available info like court records.

            • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh I don’t disagree, I just didn’t want you to get deleted over doxxing. That’s why I made the comment, and if you notice in no part was it against the action or critical of being open about these shits who abuse our systems.

          • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Only that you’re a pedophile terrorist who’s here illegally, and therefore I needn’t justify anything.

            I don’t know where you are, and I’m only like 90% sure where I am right now, but you totally are.

              • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It was a satirical take on what people like Trump and Birchall freely accuse “illegal” immigrants of being/doing, to justify their imprisonment and deportation.

                • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s a personal attack that was unwarranted and which should be deleted and banned if the community rules were being followed.

                  It in no way feels satirical considering that there was no provocation for it aside from me responding with evidence as to why it might appear as doxxing.

                  Y’all could have just said “and we’re ok with that considering they use those strategies regularly” since that would be justification and not a personal attack.

  • Linktank@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Does he hate it because of privacy reasons or because he has a butt where his chin should be?

    • oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Whatever it is, every single hair follicle on his head is pointing away from it. Could be signs there is a butthole nestled between the cheeks?

  • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ancestry seems to have some very promising hints for additional information. It seems to be an uncommon name.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      16715 Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421

      30 minutes from Elon’s house: 109 Stratford Reserve Pl, West Lake Hills, TX 78746

      These fucks deserve zero privacy.