But Hustlebros really need that few dollars of ad revenue they can get by posting slop on Xitter and Facebook…
counterpoint
Does it 🎯 creatitity?
🤣
Do you want to save people’s lives by diagnosing respiratory diseases months before even the most competent doctors could buy analysing x-rays and CT scans?
Then yes you need AI
AI has it’s legitimate uses and just blindly treating like the devil incarnate only hurts the many many valid criticisms of AI.
I’m not OP but I guarantee you this meme is about generative AI and not the machine learning applications you’re referring to
Not generative, no. Degenerative. LLMbeciles and their ilk. What most people refer to as “AI” today in common parlance.
But they knew that. Just like you did. They just need to be dorks to get that flagging ego of theirs hard.
Yeah true, but I’m really proud of the work my team does and very invested in it, so will always come to it’s defence when people say AI in general is bad, even if they probably mean genAI
Yeah true, but I’m really proud of the work my team does and very invested in it, so will always come to it’s defence when people say AI in general is bad, even if they probably mean genAI
It’s not just companies pushing “AI” hype that are dishonest, the term itself is: artificial neural networks today simply do not meet reasonable definitions of intelligent and they won’t anytime soon.
Cheers to you for doing useful work, but why not call it something more accurate like computer vision or medical image computing?
spoiler
i guess maybe because calling things “AI” gets them funded? 😭
We’ve been using the term AI for a very long time now and it’s a very generic term that covers a bunch of technologies, like we’ve been talking about enemies in video games having AI for decades and people don’t find the need to correct that
that’s not me that needs it, though, I’m not in that field
Fair, but I always take “AI” to mean in particular generative AI (images/videos or text/code), and even more particularly, the models which are shoved into anything and everything and that some of us are “strongly encouraged” to use at work. I suspect many of us do in that comm.
It would be great if language was never abused, and we always made the distinction between this and other applications/fields of statistical learning but marketing departments have decided otherwise…
AI in the setting of radiology is a somewhat useful tool in niche areas but not replacing radiologists anytime soon.
But how accurate is it. If anything like any other use, it’s dubious at best.
Due to the nature of it we aim to minimise false negatives rather than false positives, but our current version gives a correct negative around 98.6% of the time a correct positive around 87.8%
Compassionate fucking Buddha do people—sorry, not people: tech nerds—ever not comprehend the notion of “context” and “common parlance” and such.
Here’s a thought: fuck the fuck right fucking off from a group literally named “fuck AI” if your fucking fee-fees are so fucking fragile you can’t fucking not be a fucking dork, M’kay?
Buh-bye, bozo.
Compassionate fucking Buddha do people—sorry, not people: tech nerds—ever not comprehend the notion of “context” and “common parlance” and such.
I mean being autistic makes that a bit harder for me, but don’t let a little ableism get in the way of your weird little circlejerk.
Grok, do I need you? Be honest.
But what if I really want to take a shortcut into creating “art”, or making software ? And what if I find thinking to be really tiring?
Please, I need to automate every aspect of my life because a lifetime of corporate propaganda convinced me that all that matters is “productivity” and “measurable outcomes”. Let me use AI, please.
Here’s a helpful flowchart to answer your question:
I don’t understand that nerd “flowchart” shit, I’ll ask ChatGPT to explain that to me.
Thanks anyways.
this is what gpt said:
It’s a joke flowchart.
Here’s what it’s “saying”:
-
The question in the oval is “Do I need AI?”
-
Regardless of any conditions or inputs, the flowchart leads directly to the answer “No.”
So the meaning is:
👉 According to this chart, the answer to “Do I need AI?” is always no.
It’s a humorous oversimplification suggesting that people often ask whether they need AI, but the chart claims the answer is straightforward and always negative.Idk how to read, I need ChatGPT to read your comment aloud
-
But think about all the “artists” and “creatives”! With this meme, you are denying them all that hard-earned pay for “performing” their sentence into a text field!
But…?
But think about all the “artists” and “creatives”! With this meme, you are denying them all that hard-earned pay for “performing” their sentence into a text field!
Ok. Brb I’m going to go classify these 8.5M data points into 6 categories by hand.
Ah yes, something traditional programming could never achieve, automatically sorting data into buckets. It’s easy to forget how we went from clay tablets to ChatGPT with nothing in-between.
Not only that, 8.5 million data points? Sorted into 6 categories? Any LLMbecile is going to get 25% of them wrong anyway, and will likely add a seventh or eighth category on top of that. Or forget one.
Are you retarded? This isn’t going to an LLM. There is more to “AI” than chatGPT.
This whole sub is a monument to throwing the baby out with the bathwater because you don’t know shit about the domain area. Maybe it should be renamed to fuck generative AI specifically LLMs with trained explainability, RAG, and guardrails hosted by tech companies.
Maybe you should have been specific given that currently common parlance has “AI” as LLMbeciles. Specified the type of AI.
But then you couldn’t get that flagging ego hard without fapping, could you?
Why do all the worst shits seem to hang out at sh.itjust.works? /rhetorical
I’d be mad too if I got caught on a technicality when my identity is based around hating something I don’t really understand. I see LLM and “llmbecile” is pretty much all you have, and being that shallow is a tough life. Maybe YOU shouldn’t have jumped to conclusions.
I feel for you, bro.
Doesn’t sound quite as catchy
You’ve got a point there. It would lose a fair bit of curb appeal.
Ok go ahead. I’ll give you some labeled example data, and you can use traditional programming to sort these assorted text strings into the “supports premise”, “rejects premise”, and “neither supports nor rejects” buckets. Once traditional programming does that without BERT or some other classifier, I’ll put in a rec for the full data and you can come work at my company running a data science division.
Let’s go. There’s more to AI/ML than chatgpt.
sorry I ain’t working for someone that spends their time calling people retarded in a tiny anti-AI sub because they don’t draw a bright enough line between different flavors of AI for your personal tastes. Thanks for the offer though, but I’ll have to politely refuse to prove to you the fact that programmatic sentiment analysis existed long before people used AI for it, and it worked just fine.
Well that’s good. I was worried I was going to have to tell you that job offers on Lemmy aren’t serious, but you cleared that bar with a herculean bound! I’ll take your refuse to prove as “can’t meaningfully prove” without loss of generality and go about my day. It’s been real.
