• ApertureUA@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    I feel like the only “good” distributions nowadays are Arch and NixOS (everywhere else, you become a construction worker every time you want a slightly niche program), while both having shitty stereotypes about users. And Arch currently only properly works on amd64. And NixOS’s model isn’t for everyone…

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Ackshually…

      I’m not motivated to type up a response on mobile but I’m surprised there isn’t an argument comment yet. What are we coming to…

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      What’s wrong fedora? I’ve barely used it but it’s what I usually recommend to non tech savvy people, specificially the kinoite version (KDE + atomic updates).

      • ApertureUA@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Oh, nothing wrong with Fedora specifically. I also recommend Fedora KDE to people like this.

        But, imagine you saw someone use a project somewhere online you want to try and it’s not popular enough to be in the repos. Now you have to git clone --depth 1 --recursive blah blah blah, source ~/cflags.sh, mkdir build, cd build, cmake …, make -j4…

        Doesn’t sound difficult. But over time, your home directory becomes FULL of random ass git repositories. AND your /usr/local/bin is full of outdated stuff, sometimes overwriting updated stuff in /usr/bin. Having the AUR reduces that significantly.

        • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          For the AUR I agree, I use arch on my daily computer. What I’m more confused about is Nix, I still can’t see the general usecase, besides the obvious niche ones.