A source within Japan’s prime minister’s office said Thursday that the country needs nuclear weapons, remarks that deviate from the country’s long-standing non-nuclear principles and could trigger backlash at home and abroad.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251218205359/https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/67089


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ooh, I’ve got another Tom Lehrer song for this…

    🎶🎵 First we got the bomb and that was good 'cause we love peace and motherhood. Then Russia got the bomb but that’s ok because the balance of power is maintained that way. Who’s next?🎵🎶

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    🎶🎵🎶We will all go together when we go. What a comforting fact it is to know. With complete participation in that grand incineration, we will all go together when we go.🎶🎵🎶

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re probably right — historically, Japan has had a defense-only army and no nuclear arsenal, and depended on the US to defend it through treaties.

    The current US administration has demonstrated that those treaties are likely worthless today; Japan can’t depend on the US to come to its aid if another country attacks them.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      historically, Japan has had a defense-only army

      Recently Japan has had a defense-only army.

      Historically, Japan tried to conquer all of Asia.

      The only reason they didn’t possess nuclear weapons is because they hadn’t been invented yet.

  • AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure, maybe. I would like to remind everyone that this woman is a member of an insane cult called Unification Church which control politics in many parts of Asia. Not much better than Islam, Christianity or Judaism ofc. but I don’t think we need more of these lunatics running around.

    • kiku@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. What the Ukraine war showed everyone was that defense treaties are meaningless if they aren’t enforced, and therefore every country is on its own.

      The best deterrent against an invasion is nuclear weapons, and so every country should stockpile as many nuclear weapons as possible.

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And you two just made every American second amendment and Marxist armed proletariat argument on the world scale.

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Japan opposed iranian nuclear program and supported the sanctions. Such hypocrisy

  • xxam925@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh that’s rich.

    Iran will get them long before Japan does. After what they did to China… it’s only a matter of time. China knows it, Japan knows it and sees the us slinking off that side of the world stage.

    Just like at a hood party Japan is getting knocked out before they leave. Their boy been attentive but he seems to be leaving with that chick over there… China is perking up and no way they are gonna let em slide.

    If you don’t mind the allegory.

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Crazy they want nukes now, considering how much they hated the first two they got. Everyone’s a critic.