• Chris Remington@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This makes no sense. My point was about the global scholarly consensus that the biblical texts do not address LGBTQ+ issues as they are understood today AND Christendom globally does not consider homosexuality to be a sin.

    • Pec@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Ok, I reread the comments and I think I found the issue: (me, lisko etc): we might’ve mixed up “scholarly” and “theological” approaches (the latter of which is more evangelical-conservative, while the former is more anthropological).

      I would still argue that the latter is more prevalent in communal practice, and thus is representative of what the majority (or at last a significant minority) of U.S. Christians currently think.

      • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I understand where you are coming from. If you knew my personal backstory and what I have experienced, then I believe you and others would at least entertain where I am coming from.

        People are going to believe whatever they want to believe. That fact is bittersweet and sometimes it saddens me.

        Let me put it to you plainly. If there is a ‘god’ or ‘higher power’ that wants human beings to suffer in every way imaginable, then I don’t want to have anything to do with it.

        The ineffable has shown me, on several occasions, that this is not the case.