• shapesandstuff@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been known and warned for probably decades now.

    But still we continue to “preemptively” use it in vast quantities in the meat, milk and egg industry instead of using sustainable or even humane conditions for the animals in question.

    Guess who gets to eat antibiotics evey day, increasing likelihood of multi resistant germs?

    Meat eaters. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565197/

    Nothing will be done about it until its too late. As is tradition. Profits are more important than world wide disaster. Again.

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Multiple countries need to fix their inadequate regulations to stop aggravating antibiotics resistance, including:

      • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was also shocked to learn the US have over the counter antiobiotics that people pop for random illness and minor cuts/scrapes. Pretty much unthinkable here (EUN)

          • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Besides the topicals OTC that i outlined in here, US friends of mine “keep” their remaining prescription ABs for when they are sick again.

            Like he got prescribed some for a COLD and then kept them to pop when he gets the next COLD :'D

            Its nuts. Some OTC, others simply overprescribed.

            Here you get a prescription if you have a severe infection, OR a substantial injury with high risk.

            • bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Wait, I’m assuming you’re from somewhere in Europe, you don’t have topical antibiotics available without prescription?!

              I wouldn’t argue against antibiotics being overprescribed in America, they definitely are. The tendency is for medicine to be prescribed if a patient sees a doctor. Another crappy consequence of an expensive medical system, people won’t be satisfied if they spent hundreds of dollars only to be told to rest and drink lots of fluids.

              US friends of mine “keep” their remaining prescription ABs for when they are sick again

              This is definitely a thing that morons do over here 😂

          • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, some topical AB are available according to a quick online search

            Some topical antibiotics can be purchased as over-the-counter (OTC) medicines.
            However, it is always recommended that you consult a medical expert before purchasing and using any medication.
            Topical antibiotics are used to treat skin wounds, scrapes, scratches, and minor burns.
            They are available in ointment, cream, spray, or powder forms and are used to prevent infection in topical skin ailments.
            Some over-the-counter topical antibiotics include: Bacitracin (Neosporin)
            Polymyxin (Polysporin)
            Neomycin (Neosporin Plus Pain Relief)
            Pramoxine
            Benzoyl peroxide (Proactiv)

            • millie@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s a huge difference between saying ‘antibiotics are available OTC’ and ‘topical antibiotics are available OTC’. One is misleading clickbait nonsense, the other is true.

              • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thats why i didnt write what you claim i did.

                “they have over the counter antiobiotics”

                As in antibiotics exist there that are OTC.

                Is that so absurd?

        • amzd@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          How does reducing land and water use through your food choice not help the planet?

          • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are making the false assumption that your consumption is causative to the production of animal products which is, unfortunately and non-intuituvely, untrue. The only difference between vegan and non-vegan diets is whether animal products end up on your plate vs. in “cheese mountain” type stockpiles, exports, landfills, etc.

            That being said, ‘commie’ is a terrible communicator if that’s what they’re trying to say. Going vegan does help to highlight some of the contradictions of capitalism and you’re on the right track as it should be advocated for. However, the ‘invisible hand of the free market’ does not translate veganism to any reduction in farmed animals, land or water use.

            • amzd@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              “If you don’t buy it a company will throw it away instead” is not a very good argument to buy something if you even believe it to be true at all.

              • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s not what I’m saying, I’m saying the act of “not buying it” (even if it was a complete and total boycott) has no impact on the production due to the system of subsidies, futures, derivatives, etc. that is set up explicitly to make sure production continues. And therefore has no impact on land/water usage, suffering etc.

                With the point being that it’s a good first step, but if your expectation is it will change anything without first changing the underlying system you will be very disappointed.

                • amzd@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Your argument is called the nirvana fallacy;

                  “World peace would be ideal; this peace treaty fails to completely achieve world peace; therefore this peace treaty is not worth doing.”

                  And I do not accept that.

                • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Surely the societal pressure to change the systems that support factory farming of animals will grow pretty much in proportion with the vegan/vegetarian population? I don’t like the defeatist attitude that our choises as consumers don’t matter, at all.

                • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Are u saying if over night the entire customer base of meat as a whole stopped buying it would have zero effect? Certainly thats not whay youre saying right?

        • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It takes less land and water to feed someone wheat, soy or corn than to feed them beef, chicken or pork.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            what crops that are fed to beef chicken and pork are parts of plants that people won’t eat for the most part. The same fields that grow the soybeans we use for oil are growing soybeans that are used as feed. The same soybeans that are used for oil are used for feed.

            • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is sometimes true. However, e.g., about 4% of the farmland in California is used for alfafa, which is just for livestock. Alfafa is also a very water intensive crop.

              Additionally, there are other uses that livestock corn feed could be put to if there weren’t so many damn cows, so it’s not like we’d be throwing away megatons of silage if it weren’t for cattle.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            but beef, chicken, and pork continue to be made in increasing amounts. things are getting worse despite the fact that vegans exist. being vegan doesn’t help the planet at all.

            • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              World population increase + westernization of diets in China outweigh the tiny number of vegans in the western world. Your math doesn’t check out.

    • BumbleBeeBleep@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Running out” is a bit of a weird title here, it doesn’t mean that some deposit is running dry. There are more and more bacteria getting resistant for more and more types of antibiotics, making them no longer effective. Even a bottomless supply of antibiotics is useless if it doesn’t actually kill the things it’s supposed to kill.

      I suppose the “running out” part would mean that there are only so many types of antibiotics, if none of them are effective anymore (or not enough of them are effective enough) we would be in some deep shit.

      (being in deep shit may cause a severe risk of bacterial infection, I highly recommend not being in such a situation)

      • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So this has been reported for years now. We aren’t running out of antibiotics. We are running out of options like you said. The real reason is that doctors would prescribe stronger antibiotics than were needed. Also, people would stop taking the full course because they felt better before then, and lastly, farms give antibiotics to their animals just in case, so any bacteria that would survive any of these is allowed to reproduce and become resistant to antibiotics.

  • The way idiots abuse antibiotics sure is troubling, but there’s a bit of hope. As it turns out, the more resistent bacteria become to antibiotics, the less resistance they have th phages.

    Bacteriophages are viruses that will infect and kill specific strains of bacteria. The Soviets actually put a lot of effort into building a phage bank. The downside is that you need to match the phage to the specific bacteria you’re trying to fight, but this also means they’re less devastating to your gut biome.

    When every bacteria is resistant to most antibiotics, we’ll still have a way to cure the most common ones. It’ll be more expensive though, and you can bet we’ll end up with a whole bunch of people dying of cuts and scraps again, but it won’t be the end of modern medicine.