Ok let’s give a little bit of context. I will turn 40 yo in a couple of months and I’m a c++ software developer for more than 18 years. I enjoy to code, I enjoy to write “good” code, readable and so.

However since a few months, I become really afraid of the future of the job I like with the progress of artificial intelligence. Very often I don’t sleep at night because of this.

I fear that my job, while not completely disappearing, become a very boring job consisting in debugging code generated automatically, or that the job disappear.

For now, I’m not using AI, I have a few colleagues that do it but I do not want to because one, it remove a part of the coding I like and two I have the feeling that using it is cutting the branch I’m sit on, if you see what I mean. I fear that in a near future, ppl not using it will be fired because seen by the management as less productive…

Am I the only one feeling this way? I have the feeling all tech people are enthusiastic about AI.

  • UmeU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    AI is a really bad term for what we are all talking about. These sophisticated chatbots are just cool tools that make coding easier and faster, and for me, more enjoyable.

    What the calculator is to math, LLM’s are to coding, nothing more. Actual sci-fi style AI, like self aware code, would be scary if it was ever demonstrated to even be possible, which it has not.

    If you ever have a chance to use these programs to help you speed up writing code, you will see that they absolutely do not live up to the hype attributed to them. People shouting the end is nigh are seemingly exclusively people who don’t understand the technology.

    • anarchost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never had to double check the results of my calculator by redoing the problem manually, either.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Haven’t we started using AGI, or artificial general intelligence, as the term to describe the kind of AI you are referring to? That self aware intelligent software?

      Now AI just means reactive coding designed to mimic certain behaviours, or even self learning algorithms.

      • UmeU@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s true, and language is constantly evolving for sure. I just feel like AI is a bit misleading because it’s such a loaded term.

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I get what you mean, and I think a lot of laymen do have these unreasonable ideas about what LLMs are capable of, but as a counter point we have used the label AI to refer to very simple bits of code for decades eg video game characters.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, this is the thing that always bothers me. Due to the very nature of them being large language models, they can generate convincing language. Also image “ai” can generate convincing images. Calling it AI is both a PR move for branding, and an attempt to conceal the fact that it’s all just regurgitating bits of stolen copywritten content.

      Everyone talks about AI “getting smarter”, but by the very nature of how these types of algorithms work, they can’t “get smarter”. Yes, you can make them work better, but they will still only be either interpolating or extrapolating from the training set.