I prefers the term of Dialectical Materialism simulator.
It’s a fantasy game for closet commies, as HOI IV is for closet Nazis or Wehraboos in the end
I’m not bothering to read much of this(500 comments?), but after a few minutes quick glance its the usual fairly above average positive response as usual.
I wonder if it is because with the game becoming less popular again most of the mainstream is gone already.
Sorta. It’s very materialist. It treats economics as the foundation of historical development. Interest groups attract people based primarily on material concerns. Classes hence struggle against each other (afaik without scripting) and create alliances with other classes and do revolutions. What its really missing imo is the environmental aspect to be truly ‘marxist’ tho (the 19th century is when concerns about “what happens when we run out of fertiliser/trees/fish/etc” started really growing as a result of unprecedented extractivism, and these are recurring concerns in Capital)
A lotta the reason people keep talking about marxism in vicky3 is because the devs of vicky3 outright said they uesed some of Marx’s economic theories because it makes for good game design.
Also something something reality has a marxist bias.
Yes but I also mean more in general you’d certainly expect a lot more bashing of AES or “If Marx good why China bad?” kind of nonsense. The ability for redditors to stay on a topic and not use that to push a narrative these days, its rare. In fact literaly only a single comment mentions China in a neutral tone.
China has been decoupled in western minds from communism. The only communism for westerners to be found in China is “authoritarianism”, whereas the comments there are talking about economy first and foremost.
It’s really funny occasionally reading a post where someone is like “communism is OP in Victoria 3”. Oh, word?