• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    https://twitter.com/Zetta_330/status/1765081419687371165

    Look for yourself, they used someone else’s code, it’s technically not illegal according to the CLA of GitHub , but that’s not relevant to DCMA. It requires them to reverse engineer the code for an emulator, which they didn’t do.

    The dev provided the means in discord themselves, they also had a google drive with a ripped key, they also had files on discord of roms to test their gamesc which were acquired illegally.

    Please tell me what they did right to claim game preservation…?

    The fact that it didn’t go to discovery when other cases have is damning in itself, and you want it in your court? Okay….

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Look for yourself, they used someone else’s code, it’s technically not illegal according to the CLA of GitHub , but that’s not relevant to DCMA. It requires them to reverse engineer the code for an emulator, which they didn’t do.

      Did you read the link you sent? “it’s coded in an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE.”

      Hard to steal code when it’s not the language your program is written in. And even if they did… “btw the entire basis for this claim is a reddit post from 3 years ago with the “stolen code” in question being ~50 lines of minor gui fixes” Doesn’t sound like a whole lot of emulation code is in question here.

      The dev provided the means in discord themselves, they also had a google drive with a ripped key, they also had files on discord of roms to test their gamesc which were acquired illegally.

      Provide ANY evidence of this please. I don’t participate in Discord. So just stating that they published shit there doesn’t mean much to me.

      Please tell me what they did right to claim game preservation…?

      I don’t have to. Emulation is 100% covered REGARDLESS of what they did “right” or “wrong”. It’s other actions that caused them to settle. Not YUZU as a program.

      The fact that it didn’t go to discovery when other cases have is damning in itself, and you want it in your court? Okay….

      No it doesn’t. It doesn’t mean a damn thing. What the fuck are you high on?

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      https://twitter.com/Zetta_330/status/1765081419687371165 Look for yourself, they used someone else’s code, it’s technically not illegal according to the CLA of GitHub…

      It has nothing to do with some made up CLA that GitHub doesn’t even have ರ⁠_⁠ರ , it’s a matter of the license the project is under. Which is open source, e.g. GPL, Apache, MIT, etc. all of which doesn’t prevent the use of the code in other open source projects, especially when consent was already given before hand.

      …but that’s not relevant to DCMA.

      You bet your ass it isn’t, because the code from Ryujinx doesn’t infringe on Nintendo copyright either.

      DCMA

      It’s DMCA.

      … It requires them to reverse engineer the code for an emulator, which they didn’t do.

      How the shit do you think emulators are created without reverse engineering? You can’t be serious.

      Please tell me what they did right to claim game preservation…?

      They used clean room reverse engineering which is a form of independent creation and already has decades of precedent in its favor.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The fact that it didn’t go to discovery when other cases have is damning in itself, and you want it in your court? Okay….

      You realise that Nintendo’s coffers are quite huge and they can just bleed out the Devs of yuzu if it had gone to court?