• Peter G@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    @Gigan
    There are none! There’s a reason pure communism is called a utopia. Because it is! While it may work for a small community of like-minded individuals, is just not scalable. The more people there are the more difference of opinion there is.
    @RmDebArc_5

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Pure Communism, ie the formation of society after the contradictions within Socialism have been resolved, is not called a Utopia except by anti-communists.

      • Peter G@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        @Cowbee
        Resolved how? Did I somehow miss a memo?

        There’s a reason that all past attempts at the establishment of communist states have failed. Lenin, Mao, et al, had grand ideas steeped in Marxist teachings. All of them ended up in an authoritarian state. Cuba, North Korea, China, USSR. All failed because of the human factor.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Contradiction refers to the remaining vestiges from Capitalism, ie a State, Class, and Money. I suggest reading up on Historical Materialism and Dialectics.

          Secondly, failing because of “the human factor” is a purely idealistic outlook and not a materialist analysis, you’re arguing off of vibes.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yes, you are quite literally an idealist by citing “the Human Factor” as a necessary reason for issues faced by AES countries.

              Idealism proposes the idea of unchanging Human characteristics, Materialism proposes the idea that environments shape ideas. The former is undoubdtedly unscientific, while the latter is scientific.

              Fighting for a goal is not what I am referring to as Idealism.