Lately, I found out that Application Launcher also features all the functionality I use from KRunner.
In my particular experience, Application Launcher is snappier at first launch and also returns results rather quickly. For me, this begs an obvious question.
What’s the use case for using KRunner over the Application Launcher?
So far I’ve noticed that pressing Enter on the Calculator results makes the entry be copied on KRunner, but this does not happen for the Application Launcher. I’m certain there must be something else to it, otherwise people would not be using it (even I found myself using it from time to time, but could not understand why).
Krunner is better at displaying longer search results. The launcher truncates anything longer than 1 line. Dictionary definitions are an example.
Krunner also keeps what was last typed in, which is very useful if I’m adding up a bunch of numbers, or if I need to switch to a different application before using the result.
Yup, that’s more like it. I hadn’t realized about the first paragraph.
For me, KRunner has some quick actions for certain applications that I use a lot. Like a quick connect to a VPN service.
Isn’t that runner picked up by the KDE Application launcher as well?
I’m not sure. It’s a krunner specific plugin. If it is, I just haven’t noticed.
Clearly, KRunner exists so that if Plasma crashes, I can run
plasmashell --replacein there. 🙃Alright, a somewhat more serious response: It gives people flexibility in how they can use their system. For example, the Application Launcher requires having widget for it on your panel. It requires having a panel.
Personally, I also just like KRunner, because it doesn’t take me out of my workflow so much. The Application Launcher feels like I’m now doing the separate task of launching an application, with how it slaps that flyout into your face, covering your windows underneath. KRunner on the other hand feels like I’m merely adding another window.
In general, though, you might not find massively convincing reasons to have it, because why not? They use the same backend code. The tiny bit of UI to display KRunner, that doesn’t cause much maintenance. Even if it did cause much maintenance, it’s not like the volunteers working on that are going to work on something else instead.
When I first switched to kde 6. Krunner had to replace andromeda launcher for me cause it wasn’t updated. now though? Krunner is just ingrained to my muscle memory and workflow I can’t turn back to a launcher
KDE and RAM usage…
i.e. it does not use enough RAM
Related https://youtu.be/sCoioLCT5_o
Maybe that could also help @Brickardo@feddit.nl.
Yes. Even though this does not apply for most laptop users. That stuff should be in RAM as even on my crazy new NVME (not supported by many installers etc) it is still slow to launch these effects.
Think it’s mainly just preference. I prefer krunner since it feels closer to raycast when I was on Mac, then when I switched to Linux as my daily driver, runner just felt natural. (Tried out Alfred for a bit but krunner did everything I personally needed)
