So i have a bunch of pc’s/laptops/computers and such that my family members refuse to depart with even though there really bad. so far they mangae to keep 4 bulky computers in total, we do have some new-ish ones but theses ones im talking about need some loving.1 computer is 32 bit and has 2gb of ram, the other 3 have 64-bit and range from 1gb of ram- to 2 and one of which has only 75 space hardrive.

are there any linux distros that might work becasue im a noob who uses windows so im very lost. any tips or suggestions or something would be great.

also if im posting in the wrong plac eplease let me know in the comments.

  • ppp@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used Debian on an old netbook with an Intel Atom and onyl 2GB RAM. The experience wasn’t so bad but web browsing was definitely a pain. Video calling and watching YouTube (Firefox) was very sluggish and annoying to deal with. It’s fine for working with documents and watching low resolution videos locally but that’s about it.

    I’ve also tried antiX but a lot of the defaults were annoying. If you (or your family members) can deal with it, then it’s probably the best lightweight Linux distro out there.

    are there any linux distros that might work becasue im a noob who uses windows so im very lost. any tips or suggestions or something would be great.

    In this case, I recommend just leaving your family members to do their own thing. From my experience, it is very hard to manage other people’s Linux issues if you don’t have decent knowledge on it yourself. If they don’t want to upgrade, that’s their problem. Not yours.

  • rimu@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Browser choice is probably going to make just as much difference as distro choice. Modern browsers kinda need at least 1 GB to be usable, ideally more. Depends what you do with it of course.

    Try Pale Moon, Falkon and Konqueror.

    • ShySpark@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      alright and are you sure that is the best starter option? also what can i do on linux compared to windows?

      • Granixo@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Think of it as Windows 7 in terms of functionality but with a Windows Vista/XP GUI.

        That said, your CPU’s performance will increase noticebly on Linux.

      • aMalayali@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        best option

        Ubuntu is popular and new-user friendly. And xfce is generally lighter on resources. It’s a good choice.

        What can I do

        Almost everything.
        Some proprietary apps you’ve used from windows may not be available, but there equivalent ones would be available on linux.
        Stuff like browsing the web(provided that you don’t open too many tabs, because you have low ram) and watching movies n all is quite good.
        What all things fo you intend to do on it? I think it’ll be easier to check that the things you want are there.

  • Himawari@lemmy.4d2.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d suggest Debian with LXDE, which, from my personal experience, works pretty fine on low-end computers. You can replace LXDE with your choice of Windows Managers for an even lighter system, but that might be a little hard if you’ve never used Linux before.

  • Marxine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For a more “friendly flavored” distro, MX Linux is Debian-based and comes with a bunch of quality of life tools

    • YouNaughtyMonsters@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      MX Linux seconded. It’s available in 32-bit versions, too.

      I haven’t used it on a machine with less than 4GB though, but it runs well on an old Dell laptop from 2009.

  • jerry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My favorite very light is peppermintOS, I think you may have to go back to version 10 for 32 bit though.

  • YerbaYerba@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d suggest Linux mint Debian edition, at least for the 32bit machine. Many distros have stopped supporting 32bit lately.

    It should be fairly user friendly.

  • Little Trans Punk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I, personally, would suggest Debian 12 especially since they still supply 32 bit ISOs. (Also 64 bit, but that’s kind of a given at this point)

    • Debian is rock stable due to testing like crazy
    • Adding a lightweight desktop like XFCE would help with not overloading the PC
    • If I remember correctly, updates for the next 5 years since it’s a long term support (LTS) release
    • I am guessing you mean 75 GB which should still have, at minimum (absolute worst case everything went wrong kind of wrong), 60 GB left for programs and files

    Since they provide both 64 and 32 bit ISOs and run the same thing, all support issues can be done exactly the same on all the computers since, I assume, there is no dedicated graphics card (Nvidia, AMD) in any of them.

    Here’s a link to the downloads: https://www.debian.org/distrib/

    Download from the “complete installation image” area on the left, second section down.

    Edit: If you can use a DVD or USB then use the DVD link, but if they can’t then the CD image will also work.

  • gi1242@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recommend arch linux. Also most desktop environment are light enough to run on old hardware. Just disable file content indexing

  • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alpine Linux is one to look at.

    MX Linux works good on old hardware.

    If you’re looking for a DE, XFCE might even feel sluggish on older hardware. You can go lighter with LXQt or use the Pixel Desktop that Raspberry Pi OS has (which is modified LXDE).

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AntiX is quite good on older hardware but beware of the fact they don’t use systemd. Nice effort to try and use newer init services but a lot of things really depend on systemd being installed.

    WattOS (which uses systemd) is also very performant on old rigs but it needs more tweaking OOTB I’d say.

  • nomadic@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Puppy Linux is made for old machines and generally just works. You can boot it up on a live USB and see what you think. Lots of flavours to choose from.