• istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    My native language (Türkish) does not have grammatical gender. Gender in grammar is just silly and useless.

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      No. Language needs as many possible structures and rules as well as millions of exceptions and oddities so it is really hard to learn.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s part of why I just use They in English for everyone. Less having to learn people’s whatever; I don’t care. You’re cis male he? Don’t care, you’re a they now. More room left in brain. We can fix this shit right now.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        We do have a distinction between singular ‘they’ and plural ‘they’. It’s helpful.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re cis male he? Don’t care, you’re a they now.

        Now you’re back to not respecting peoples pronouns

        • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t have enough bandwidth to remember everyone’s names, let alone their pronouns. This is the compromise.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    AceFuzzLord can’t wait for the use of all pronouns to be banned and English papers won’t be legally allowed to use basic words such as “I”, “Me”, “You”, etcetera. That’ll teach the libs!

    /s

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      what, which, who, whom, whose, this, that, these, and those, everybody, either, none, and something,

      Amongothers. It’s ironic conservatives know so little grammar that they can’t even add “personal” to before “pronouns” to make it at least slightly more accurate, but no.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Culture War aside, that’s not how language works. You have as much understanding to the history of language as you have basic dignity to other human beings.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Believe it or not, languages change over time. They grow and adapt to fit their context.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Looks like you’re getting a lot of people riled up here.

      I’m curious about why you find it so objectionable for someone to choose their pronouns but are fine with name changes.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because the rules of the English language are the same for everybody. You don’t just get to go around telling people they have to use a different ruleset for you or when they are around you. It’s pretentious as fuck to expect people to cater their use of the language like that. That’s exactly what names are for.

          Certainly, the rules of the English language exist for a reason. For me, that’s to communicate and convey information. If you unilaterally decide to change the language, then your words can fail to communicate what you intend. Although, I don’t think that applies here. Correct me if you think otherwise.

          If anything, it seems like the “new” pronoun rules you see today are people trying to enforce the standard English rules. He/she communicates someone’s gender presentation. If you refer to “him” between someone who looks masculine versus feminine, then you’ll assume that the “him” refers to the one that’s masculine-presenting. That’s how English usually works, and it works this way to allow us more efficient communication. Of course, this doesn’t work 100% of the time because there are many axes and a gradient on each of these axes between what we consider masculine or feminine. What would the English language dictate when you’re near one extreme on some axes and the other extreme on others? I don’t believe we have any well defined and useful rules for this besides the preference of the person it’s referring to. Again, do correct me if I get anything wrong.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bold take, here on Lemmy. Let’s see how it goes for them

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      But… you can change all of those things, adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, you can change all of them by changing your behaviour and characteristics… You can’t even get your own stupid arguments to be correct.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      You don’t get to change your adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, etc.

      Says who? You? Are you the arbiter of language?

      I’ll call you Mrs. I’ll call you Mr. But the rest, nuh uh.

      Really? Not even Ms.? Because I imagine a lot of younger women would feel pretty insulted by you calling them Mrs.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      nuh uh.

      Newfangled terminology

      Thoughts on prescribing use of the OG word only?

      You don’t get to change your adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, etc.

      True, not in repressive societies. And look, I have limits, I’ll be hard pressed to refer to someone as squirrelkinlifragilisticexpialidocious every time. But you’d made a reasonable accommodation in polite company I figure?