snixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down128
arrow-up1127arrow-down1imageWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlsnixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-squareThesePaycheckAvenging@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd yet, Linux tools are even older and the kernel better written than either Windows or OSX.
minus-squarenorapink@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoBefore flatpak Linux backwards compatibility was rough.
minus-squareStudioLE@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDo you have a source for the second half of your statement?
minus-squarePaintedSnail@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMost of which have to be recompiled to support newer libraries when the older libraries aren’t supported anymore. There’s a reason why package managers have to deal with dependency issues.
And yet, Linux tools are even older and the kernel better written than either Windows or OSX.
Before flatpak Linux backwards compatibility was rough.
Do you have a source for the second half of your statement?
Most of which have to be recompiled to support newer libraries when the older libraries aren’t supported anymore. There’s a reason why package managers have to deal with dependency issues.