My laptop isn’t under my supervision most of the time. And I’d hate it if someone were to steal my SSD, or whole laptop even, when I’m not around. Is there a way to encrypt everything, but still keep the device in sleep, and unclock it without much delay. It’s a very slow laptop. So decryption on login isn’t viable, takes too long. While booting up also takes forever, so it needs to be in a “safe” state when simply logged out. Maybe a way that’s decrypt-on-demand?
I’m on Arch with KDE.
How old are we talking? If the CPU is >10 years old and/or some kind of ARM, it may not have hardware encryption acceleration, which means it’ll happen in software. I did that once, it was horrible.
lscpu |grep -i aesshould probably tell you what you need to know.If you don’t have hardware encryption you can use
--cipher xchacha20,aes-adiantumoption when runningcryptsetupto make it way faster than standard aes cipher in software.It does give me a result so I do have “aes”. How can I use it?
We’re talking an Intel i5-8350U. it has 16GBs of ram and 500GB of SSD.
That’s not a slow laptop. I’ve been daily driving worse for years.
To protect the data from random thief just browsing through the files I still use ecryptfs. It only encrypts the home directory, and the keys are derived from my accounts password, so no extra hassle.
The encryption is weak by the current standards, and wouldn’t stop a determined attacker, but it’s 100% better than nothing, and I’ve never noticed any performance problems.
I’m not planning on putting information on my laptop that I don’t have to. Speed for a bit of security sounds good. I’ll look into
ecryptfs. And also into boot time, lots of you are screaming at me that it’s a fast laptop. what how
You said you’re on Arch, you’ll want to go through their docs which are solid: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_an_entire_system
That is absolutely not a slow laptop. If it takes a long time to boot there must be something wrong. I have a similar system that takes about ten seconds to boot.
Anyways, like others said, LVM with LUKS is the simplest. It uses your hardware to quickly decrypt the drive on boot. While it is running access to your data is protected by your login manager or lock screen.
That’s pretty much my ThinkPad’s Specs. Fine for almost all stuff I have to do on the go (expect CAD, don’t try to run BricsCAD on the thing, it’ll make you go crazy.)
I use full disk encryption on it, as on all my other devices, and it’s fine, speed-wise. The SSD is NVME, not SATA, but I doubt the performance impact would be noticeable on a SATA SSD if that’s what you’ve got.
mine’s m.2 too. I tried systemd-homed, as of now it doesn’t work as it should. Next I’ll try disk/partition one but it’d be great to encrypt when sleeping, it’s fine if it’s hibernation
Full disk encryption always seemed the most sensible to me, but I’m not sure whether that needs to be decrypted after hibernation.
That’s a hard thing to do for a bunch of reasons. There’s someone else who went into em so I’m not gonna do that.
Unless something’s seriously wrong, it would probably be better to just make your laptop boot faster.
So, what’s your laptop, what kind of disk does it have and how long does it take to boot/login?
Is your idea to do the easier decrypt on boot, and optimize the boot times?
I could probably do that, but someone else said that there is a decrypt on hibernate, seems better.
Yeah im thinking do “normal” decrypt on boot. It’ll be easier to troubleshoot and recover from if something goes wrong and there’s fewer pitfalls to deal with.
I also suspect that theres a problem with your computer because boot times have been pretty fast for many years now.
E: I just now saw that you’re using an eighth generation intel processor, plenty of ram and an ssd.
I have the same situation but a much older processor and my boot times from button press to desktop are ~10 seconds.
Unless your expectations for boot times are way out of line, you ought to have no problem using decrypt on boot.
One possibility is that your ssd has aged and is having to read those old system file blocks hundreds of times to get it right. Badblocks -n or spinrite level 2 or 3 scan fixes this problem.
I bought it used, so I’m interested in your last point. I’ve reinstalled it - first thing I did. Do SSDs slow down overtime? And there is a linux command to fix that? Sound crazy, can you elaborate?
Yeah badblocks -n /dev/your_target_device launched from a different boot device.
You can’t run it from your install because it’s gonna read every block into memory and then write some crap to it and read it back to make sure the block works then write what was originally there back to it.
It’s really important that you check yourself before you wreck yourself with the badblocks command because you can destroy data if you use the wrong flags.
Another program that fixes that problem is spinrite. It costs money but it’s very useful and has a lot of good documentation.
Each cell in the ssd isn’t a digital “1” or “0” but a charge coupled device that stores a voltage. Over time that potential changes in a way that’s directly proportional to the number of read cycles and age of the data from first write. When it changes enough, the controller has to try to read it many times to get a sane result it can send down the bus.
That results in your ssd seeming slow.
How long does it take to boot though, and what do you expect?
didn’t run a timer, it was still fast enough, but for turning it off and on every 5 minutes (or more realisticly hour)… I’d like the fastest possible. I’ll have fun with this badblocks, sounds OP af. However I don’t think it’s a good sign if this returns anything right? I could make it so the filesystem avoids that block, that is good and all, but doesn’t that means my SSD started “turning bad”. So either way I should get a new one? If one cell fails other will soon follow, and my data is lost, no?
Always have a backup.
Badblocks shouldn’t output anything when run on an ssd. It’s not really useful for its intended purpose there because ssds have hundreds to thousands of bad blocks to start with (depending on how you define “blocks”) and reprovision messed up sections all the time to cover up the fact that they’re screwing up constantly from the bus.
It’s also true of rotational hard drives nowadays, not that they’re fundamentally based on using a medium that’s incredibly prone to “failure” but that they don’t expose the actual addresses on the medium to the controller.
The old way, what the bad blocks tool is intended to address, is like if there were a big warehouse and when you wanted something you asked for the thing in rack 6F, shelf D8. The disk goes and gets it for you and if it’s the right thing then you’re golden and if it’s wrong you got a problem.
Badblocks -n grabs the thing on 6F,D8, sets it aside and asks the disk to put something else in there, then asks for it back. If it succeeds then wonderful! “Block” 6FD8 is good and it puts the thing that was originally there back and moves on to the next one ad infinitum.
Of course, new rotational disks and all available ssds don’t actually work like that. You hand the disk an object and say “put this in 6FD8” and the device says “you got it” and then promptly opens the package you handed over and puts its contents wherever it wants.
When you ask for 6FD8 back the device grabs all the stuff that’s supposed to be there, puts it all back together and hands it to you. The disk itself might have all kinds of messed up things going on internally and you only see it when the data you put in doesn’t come out the same.
Part of what makes the secure erase functionality work on ssds is that very insane obfuscation. When there’s no actual physical structure to the way data is stored, no “raw” read of the ccd chips can make heads or tails of it. The disk can be easily and quickly “wiped” just by asking the disk itself to kindly forget its own key used to locate information requested and viola! Secure erase!
Of course, none of that matters because we’re not using badblocks to figure out if there are bad blocks, we’re using it to force the ssd to rewrite its ccds so they respond to requests faster.
The behavior we care about is writing something to the “block” then erasing it and rewriting the original data into it. Badblocks -n should do that.
There are times when it might not though, the ssd may hand you porno.mov out of “6FD8”, write random data to somewhere in the ccd chip that it writes down is supposed to be 6FD8, read it back to badblocks, then when badblocks says “alright, that one passed, lets put porno.mov back there” the ssd says “wait a second, I have a string of bits that matches this!” And just update its internal ledger that 6FD8 is now what it was before that silly random data kerfuffle, never actually rewriting anything.
It saved a write cycle on those cells after all! It did you a favor!
So sometimes badblocks -n doesn’t work in this application. Spinrite is the “correct” tool, but for some applications it doesn’t work either (non x86 systems) so I use dd in that case to just slam the disk full of something so it can’t reprovision and save any write cycles and writes every possible cell with something. That destroys data, of course.
What I’m getting from this is badblocks isn’t a magical tool that makes all storage devices faster and better anymore. correct? The fact that modern storage devices do that is a bit scary. I’m guessing it’s firmware, no way to turn it off. And why would you, it helps you, just takes control away from you.
I wasn’t really trying to wipe my storage device, but to make it faster. However you said a bunch of interesting stuff, and I thank you for that.
LUKS2 with a strong hash.
It will take a while to decrypt but it will so be worth it. You only have to enter the password once.
LUKS2
I encrypt my disk with LVM on my Debian laptop. You’ll need to reinstall your operating system, as you have to do special partitioning. If your device has a TPM, you can use Clevis to set it to auto-decrypt.
Maybe systemd-homed is the solution you are looking for. The arch wiki has a page for it. And this can be better for your use case because only your home folder needs decryption and not the whole drive.
There is this to keep in mind since you are using KDE, but can be easily fixed: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-homed#Home_directory_remains_active_after_logging_out_of_Plasma
Sounds perfect. I’ll need more sources to understand what it’s doing and how to config it. Thanks!
Systemd has a good guide on how to use it https://systemd.io/HOME_DIRECTORY/
And they also have a guide on migrating a traditional user home to this. Do remember to take backups if going this route https://systemd.io/CONVERTING_TO_HOMED/
I personally used the arch wiki when I set it up https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-homed
There is not much config.
I think the command I used for my laptop was:
homectl create <name> --storage=luks --shell=/usr/bin/fish --member-of=wheelhttps://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-homed#Creation
Gnome is working on a gui for this, but it will probably be a while until that is out. I feel like it is pretty safe to use the cli for this one.
Hehe, Thank you. But by the time I’m reading this I’ve already done it. Got stuck on a couple or roadblocks, but figured it out. I got scared when I didn’t “enable” the service just “start” it. I’m not safe(-ish enough). :D
edit: well not the plasma fix. wiki said if it’s a problem I need to start something, and that something should be on by default. So I didn’t do anything, maybe that’s a problem
Okay I just had a bit of freetime to test it: doesn’t work… if I log out or sleep, my home dir is still mounted. Meaning it’s as good as nothing. Looked at the plasma fix, didn’t work. I have a pretty good lead, that I need the topmost template from some wiki:
[Unit] PartOf=graphical-session.targetProblem is, where in the world should I write this? I really don’t expect you to know, but maybe I’m talking to a genius. The internet didn’t help, or I used it wrong.
The template is supposed to be something that you put in your own systemd services.
plasma-kwin_x11.serviceandplasma-kwin_wayland.serviceboth already have it.If I have to guess, it is probably a bug that will get fixed sometime in the future, meaning this is not a viable solution until then. Sorry for that.
Just as a last bit of troubleshooting, check if
cat ~/.config/startkdercshowssystemBoot = true. If it does not, runkwriteconfig6 --file startkderc --group General --key systemdBoot true. I doubt this will change much, but still worth trying.If I get some free time, I will do some testing and let you know here
cat ~/.config/startkdercreturnssystemdBoot=true. I’m guessing you made a typo and this is correct. In this case I guess it just doesn’t work on KDE, my next idea is LUKS on /home and hibernating instead of sleeping. Or I always wanted to try a tiling window manager… hmsystemdBoot is supposed to be true, not a typo. But yeah, I don’t use plasma much so I don’t really know how to solve the issue… Sorry for that!
No problem, thanks for the help. Also I got news is that I don’t have to trust anyone with my laptop, I can keep it by my side after all. Still it’s a security mesure, that I didn’t solve in time. fun fact: LUKS on /home only breaks KDE. I really don’t want to give up kde tho, I put on sway, realised that I needed to memorise console commands to change my fking volumes, so no thank you. I got spoiled by sweet UIs. it’s so comfortable that everything is at one place.
Most filesystems now how encryption that is better optimized for their specific performance & might be worth choosing over LUKS… ZFS, Bcachefs, F2FS, ext4
With an encrypted disk, you only need to enter the encryption password when you shutdown or restart. Suspending and
sleeplock screen don’t need your encryption password.Suspending to disk usually requires a password on resume.
That’s true for hibernation, but not suspending. Hibernation stores everything in RAM onto the disk then shuts off the PC; to resume the system, you need to unlock the disk to access that data. Suspending doesn’t turn off the computer, it keeps the CPU and RAM active.
On my Fedora system, I can hit the suspend button and get back into the OS without needing to type my encryption password, only my user password.
Ok so what do you call “sleep”? You’ve now listed suspending, sleeping, and hibernating as 3 different things.
I can sleep “sleep”. All system components are still powered on at this stage, so it uses the most power. But at the same time it’s the quickest to get back into your system. All that’s really happening with sleep is that the screen turns off.
Then you have suspend. Laptops often first go to sleep but then suspend after a long period of inactivity to save battery.
Then you have hibernation. I don’t think this is used that often nowadays.
I have never met anyone refer to “screen off” as “sleep”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_mode
The terms everybody else are using are: “sleep” = “suspend to RAM” = “S3” and “hibernation” = “suspend to disk”.
I use ZFS on my workstations with Debian, but yeah full drive is the way to go i think even Linux Mint does full drive anymore, also remember to keep backups.
Encrypting and decrypting are complex operations that requires a lot from the hardware. The resources needed to encrypt and decrypt is proportionally correlated with the amount of files you’re encrypting and decrypting.
That said, there are some alternatives
- Encrypt the whole filesystem
- Encrypt only your home folder
- Encrypt only the files you wanna
There is an app, Vaults, that allows you to create vaults to easily encrypt and decrypt folders. Take a look on this app
Detectors say that you are human, you use multiple languages, and you are a moderator, but it feels like a 101 AI response. It’s horrible that we’re living in an era where you need to be careful about this. You were probably trying to format it nice, but I’ve only read this phrasing from AI.
But thanks for the answer, the home folder would probably be best. I don’t want to think about it after setting it up. All my downloads and docs are there. I also feel like the whole filesystem would take forever for me to unlock/boot.
Are the detectors part for real or were you just kidding? 😲
You were probably trying to format it nice, but I’ve only read this phrasing from AI.
Yes, I was, because I like to put my text well formated… I feel pain when I have to read bad formated texts, so I try to be as clean as possible
But thanks for the answer, the home folder would probably be best. I don’t want to think about it after setting it up. All my downloads and docs are there. I also feel like the whole filesystem would take forever for me to unlock/boot.
For home folder I think there is a better alternative, like systemd-homed or something like that
Are the detectors part for real or were you just kidding? 😲
they got your back, why are you suprised?
Others also said systemd-homed. And it looks promising, I’ll try it, but honestly I have no idea how to test it? From another user? From a liveboot usb?
Because I don’t even knew that this kind of tool exists. And it was precise AF. I just got surprised/scared haha
About systemd-homed, I guess that liveusb will not work… I suggest you to try in a VM and everything going ok, you may try on another user on your pc
Oh, I think I’ll wipe my laptop, and do it live. What I wanted to ask was how do I know if it’s working?
ChatGPT, is that you?
Well, looks like now we cannot be helpful and polite that people call you ChatGPT
Sorry :(
(But seriously that formatting and phrasing was very very AI looking.)
lets not forget AI was trained on human data. some people will “sound like AI” because they likely make up a big portion of its demographic training data.
fr
