• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Imagine being so scared of pronouns that you tear up a little kid’s English homework. Like, can you really be that dense? What’s next, Adjectives?!

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Modern conservatism is mental illness - it’s not a case of being dense - it’s a case of being genuinely disabled.

      Ironic for a political ideology grounded in and returning to eugenics.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        This is a disgusting thing to type, especially considering how eugenics is used against the disabled

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re getting downvoted because you’re more disgusted by people talking about the problem than you are by the problem.

          Denying eugenics would be disgusting,

          Covering for those that support eugenics would be disgusting,

          Being disgusted by someone pointing out the disgusting hypocrisy of eugenics and modern conservatism is disgusting.

          Pointing out how monstrous and hypocritical modern conservatives and eugenicists are is a moral good.

          • chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I think you’re missing the point of the original comment. Describing modern conservatism as a disability at once absolves conservatives of their responsibility not to hold abhorrent views, by classing it as a characteristic they have no control over, and lumps people with disabilities into a group that, in a non-insignificant number of cases, wants them dead or sterilised.

            That’s why the commenter was upset with you; not because you’ve criticised eugenics, but because you’ve been massively insensitive, and when someone pointed out that insensitivity you became defensive and attacked them in return.

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t think sane people are able to believe in things like Jewish space lasers, so I don’t think your average GOP voter should be held accountable for believing that kind of nonsense - they should be provided mental health care and an education in critical thinking skills. The people spreading those insane lies are a different story.

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Look, it’s clear that you hate disabled people quite a bit, and that’s what I and others take offense to, not your criticisms of conservatism…

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I don’t care if I get downvoted, I’m not here for that. I have been downvoted recently by neoliberals on this site for literally saying everyone should have the right to vote (and I quoted Lyndon B Johnson and the fucking constitution about this), so we can see how much a downvote is worth here. This isn’t a site for leftists or progressives, or even people with a basic understanding of the Civil Rights Era, and I understand that. So ofc there is someone advocating for something Nazi adjacent here, like medicalizing an entire voting base. Medicalizing something that isn’t a medical condition, especially acting as if their cognition is what is wrong, is something historically done to women in the US right before they got fucking lobotomized and put into conservatorship. It’s a conviction and punishment with no trial. Fascism. Not to mention what the actual Nazis did to people they considered disabled.

            It’s not “pointing out” anything to medicalize them. It’s an attempt to erode their rights by using laws that ALREADY abuse disabled people.

            It’s so funny how disabled people are the perfect weapon for pieces of shit who dont care about them. No one cares about helping the disabled unless it means they can weaponize them against another group they hate. Usually it’s the homeless but ig today it’s conservatives.

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yep - it’s rational, correct cognition to think that Haitians are stealing and eating people’s dogs, that Jewish space lasers caused the California wildfires, that a multi-trillion dollar fence will stop illegal immigration, that Hannibal Lecter was a real and good person, that Clinton should be locked up, but I’m voting for the felon, that the election was stolen, that the Democratic Party is a sinister communist cabal, that Michelle Obama is a man, that Biden has opened the borders and is importing millions of immigrants to steal the election, that the deep state is conspiring to do everything we don’t like…

              These are the mainstream views of the party as propagated by its leaders - it says nothing of the chemtrails making the frogs gay, hollow earth types.

              …and here you are, fantasising about me abusing and weaponising the disabled - maybe even pushing for a little light lobotomy because that allows you to feel morally superior. Personally, I’d recommend stepping out of your fantasy, grounding your comments in reality and being morally superior, but what would my apparently Nazi arse know?

              • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Most conservatives don’t believe in those things, though. That’s all propaganda being fed to them.

                I’m not fantasizing about your views regarding the disabled, I’m taking issue with what you literally said and explained why. If you don’t understand ableism, that’s on you.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m disgusted by people who use disability as a pejorative.

            Attack Republicans all you want, but drag marginalized people into your insults and you can go fuck yourself.

            Republicanism isn’t a mental disability. It’s a moral failure.

      • rotten@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They say the literal same thing about “libruls”.

        All I see are 2 statists fighting.

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh man, I would have never known if you hadn’t pointed it out. Thank you so much! /s

        Regardless of the validity of this story, I guarantee someone out there has done this to a certain extent. People get worked up about pronouns to such a degree that this almost seems like a relatively tame reaction.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    George does not like pronouns. George tries to keep George’s temper under George’s control when the (plural) people George interacts with use pronouns.

    • freeman@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Funnily enough this is how many non-binary people want to be adressed in german, as the equivalent of “they” (sie) is not used as a neutral version of he/she. Probably because “sie” is the same word as “sie” (she).

  • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s a well radicalised obedient party soldier who will stop at nothing once you point at an inconvenient target and say the right buzzwords. Real Jan6 material, just as planned and executed for decades.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would suggest it’s the conservative ideologies that are toxic, education is the antidote.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Conservatism is about favoring tradition and supporting the status quo. Going this wild about a common grammatical construct because it reminds you of people you hate for existing isn’t conservative, it’s something far worse.

      • JinFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        One could argue that so called “traditions” they are holding so much dearly in their heart never was fully a thing and is just the product of past idealizations and marketing propaganda. “The perfect suburban american trad family” from the 60s is a construct made by marketing people to sell fridges, diamond and beautiful car.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Idealizing a fake era of greatness which came before the weak, but also very powerful bad people took it away.

          Now where have I heard that one before? 🤔

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          “The perfect suburban american trad family” from the 60s

          Had one working parent and stay at home moms. But they don’t give a single fuck about that part of it, do they?

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              “Nobody paid that. They just reinvested in their company [and their employees and reputation] instead.”

              No shit. Sounds great. Let’s do that.

              • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                The world is honestly too far into the crumbles for it to work like that anymore, they would just use circuitous accounting to funnel it into bunkers, militarized yachts, private armies, and extra planetary fever dreams.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Conservatism is about favoring tradition and supporting the status quo.

        That’s just what Conservatism claims to be about, but it has always been regressive

        • nfh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think we agree that most self-identified conservatives aren’t actually very invested in the status quo or tradition, and are actually regressive reactionaries, but I think it’s a clearer point to say that most self-identified conservatives aren’t in fact conservative, than that conservatism isn’t actually what people (claim they) mean when they say conservative. At that point, conservatism loses its meaning.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            At that point, conservatism loses its meaning.

            Conservatism hasn’t lost its meaning, conservatism just never meant what conservatives claimed it meant; it’s always been a façade.

            Conservatism is about conserving (and reinforcing) power structures; all talk about ‘tradition’ and ‘stability’/‘status-quo’ is wool over your eyes.

            • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The status quo is white supremacy, patriarchy, gender norms, and capitalism. That is what they are conserving. Those are the traditions.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Conservatism is about favoring tradition and supporting the status quo.

        No, that’s a lie conservatives tell to make their ideology seem less abhorrent.

        What conservatism is actually about is perpetuating hierarchy.

      • SGforce@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        In liberal democracy, the status quo is liberalism. Conservatism was to conserve the monarchy and aristocracy.

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          There is a difference between historical conservatism and what it has become. Even setting that aside, there is much daylight between what a movement will profess and what it will ultimately produce.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, there really isn’t. True conservatism is an unbroken line from royalists, to confederates, to nazis, to Trump.

            It’s the allegedly small government, pro-freedom “conservatives” – i.e. self-deluded liberals who mislabeled themselves – who were the aberration.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    On one hand, this is obviously fake

    On the other hand, there’s 7 billion people on the planet and the odds that one of them would do this is very high

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The year was 1991.
      My roommate decides to eat hot dogs.
      We keep breads in the freezer so they last. Toaster is broken.
      I tell this to my roommate before I go to the toilet.
      I come out and I see a pot of boiling water with hot dogs and hot dog buns in it.
      My roommate decided to boil bread to warm it up.

      People can be far stupider than you could possibly ever imagine.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I had a friend that liked to put butter and honey on his bread before he put it in a two slice toaster. He did this every morning for years.

        Each time the toaster broke or caught fire, he would put it out and get a new toaster and repeat the process. He may still be doing it to this day.

  • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know, have you seen how they are teaching math these days?

    This liberal agenda is getting out of hand!! /s