kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agoruleskymedia.d.on-t.workimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down134
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageruleskymedia.d.on-t.workkopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareAvaAmazing@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 month agoWhat’s wrong with Bluesky?
minus-squarePhuntis@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·1 month agoyet another corporate social media
minus-squaremegopie@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·30 days agoIt’s repeating the same cycle, for profit social media will inevitably reach the same fate.
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·29 days agohow do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
minus-squareTriflingToad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·29 days agoYouTube was like that too
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·28 days agoeven if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·28 days agoPhase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·27 days agoSo, baseless speculation?
minus-squaregflelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·27 days agoI’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
minus-squaretfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·1 month agoIt has more than 20 users
What’s wrong with Bluesky?
yet another corporate social media
It’s repeating the same cycle, for profit social media will inevitably reach the same fate.
how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
for now
YouTube was like that too
even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
So, baseless speculation?
I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
It has more than 20 users