LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agoBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down12
arrow-up1124arrow-down1imageBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 days agoBut does it go “brrrrrrrrrrt” ?
minus-squareFisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoPlus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-27 hours agoWouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew Edited forgotten word to make it clearer
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoImma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun. See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
minus-squareoptional@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoWhat about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoSomebody get DARPA on this, stat.
But does it go “brrrrrrrrrrt” ?
Scale it up.
KABOOM > brrrrrrrt
Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
Wouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew
Edited forgotten word to make it clearer
Imma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun.
See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
What about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
Somebody get DARPA on this, stat.