• VoxAdActa@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I apologize for being a little annoyed right now. I feel like I’m being moderated for defending myself against their escalation.

    The top level comment from the mod was not aggressive or accusatory.

    My response to that top level comment was measured and nuanced, with specific examples of real events and an analysis of the mindset behind those events.

    Their reply to me included all caps, excessive punctuation, extremely bad-faith arguments (the actual religious views of every single one of the names they dropped are incredibly complicated, not just “was Christian”; again, one member of that esteemed list literally believed he could turn lead into gold with magic), and that’s assuming calling the question of critical thinking outdated and childish (“2010 New Atheist”) is not an aggressive escalation.

    Furthermore, you told me to disengage, and then the mod continued to engage. I’d appreciate it if they received a similar request, because right now it feels like you’re holding my arms behind my back while they get to keep punching me.

    • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My response to that top level comment was measured and nuanced, with specific examples of real events and an analysis of the mindset behind those events.

      That’s not how this came off to myself, or the people who reported various comments in this thread. I would encourage you to diffuse rather than escalate if you are ever met with something that feels like an escalation. It’s impossible to remove yourself entirely from a situation where you feel you are being attacked, which is why I push towards the concept of good faith. When it feels like someone is escalating- ask questions and try to diffuse rather than assume you have interpreted their words correctly.

      If you need a more detailed view of how I interpreted the interaction, feel free to check my replies further down this thread to another individual.

      Furthermore, you told me to disengage, and then the mod continued to engage. I’d appreciate it if they received a similar request

      To be absolutely clear and transparent, they have and they have since deleted some of their replies. On a more practical level I am much more familiar with this mod and their judgement than I am with you, and I’m going to be generally siding with any moderator we have as they get vetted rather thoroughly… however, we are all human here and we make mistakes and we engage in human behavior. Please have patience with us and treat us with good faith. I’m sorry if anyone failed you here, but this kind of engagement- a good faith one, where you ask questions, and try to solve problems is what I personally love to see and it’s in my experience the best way to resolve conflict. Thank you for engaging in this manner 💜

      • VoxAdActa@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        . On a more practical level I am much more familiar with this mod and their judgement than I am with you, and I’m going to be generally siding with any moderator we have as they get vetted rather thoroughly

        Well, I mean… ok, that’s fair. I can’t argue with that.

        • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          To be clear I chose to state that because I want to acknowledge my own biases here and the fact that I’m often pressed for time and making a response/decision based on a report or an escalation from a mod and a quick glance of what’s going on. The more that you make it unequivocally clear that you’re operating in good faith (even past the point that it is warranted) the more likely I am act differently based on reports/escalations given the fact that I don’t really know you right now. I don’t want to assign blame to anyone here, merely to diffuse a situation which went off the rails. Hopefully that context helps you understand why I acted in the way that I did.

          • VoxAdActa@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be clear I chose to state that because I want to acknowledge my own biases here and the fact that I’m often pressed for time

            No, that’s totally fine, and I’m being completely serious. Sometimes it’s hard to remember that this community is much smaller and tighter than the ones I’m used to. It honestly never occurred to me that y’all would, like, actually know each other, which is my own bias.

              • VoxAdActa@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, absolutely not. By Reddit standards, this was a tiff. Maybe a smaller tussle. Definitely not a kerfluffle.

                Besides, part of this is a “me” problem. I’m still adjusting to not having to come out of the gate swinging the first time I sense hostility. Did I respond to an energy? Sure. Did I respond to an intentional energy? …eh, maybe, maybe not. Did I go from 0-100 too fast? Probably. What I’m saying is, I see how I could have handled that better. And the fact that you took the time to engage with me over it is a big positive for the platform.