The period occured in 2024 between late winter and early summer. “Compared to the same period in 2023, solar output in California is up 31%, wind power is up 8%, and batteries are up a staggering 105%.”

Link to the study PDF mentioned in the article: https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/Others/25-CaliforniaWWS.pdf

One of the paper’s cowriters is Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering and director of the atmosphere/energy program at Stanford University.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    17 days ago

    Title is incorrect. Of these 98 days, the grid was 100% renewable-powered for only 4.84 hours per day on average (10.1 hours per day maximum). The title implies that it was renewable-powered for 24 hours per day.

    The actual title of the linked pdf is:

    No blackouts or cost increases due to 100 % clean, renewable electricity powering California for parts of 98 days

    This article seems to be a response to accusations that variable power output of solar/wind causes blackouts. In this study, there were zero blackouts caused by 100% renewable power supply. Also, the study period was an arbitrary set of 116 days. The 98 days were not a continuous period, nor were they 98 days of a 365 day period.

    (At time of this comment, the title of this post is “The California grid ran on 100% renewables with no blackouts or cost rises for a record 98 days”.)

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 days ago

      Thank you, i knew there must be a catch within the article and my first question is always on how they handle the night. Guess the report isn’t about that.

        • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          I learned that “batteries” can literally took many form, some use molten salt, some use gravity, some use water, and some use the battery we all know. Am actually kinda curious on what works for them, but since it isn’t really 100% consecutively it doesn’t matter in this case.

          • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            PG&e owns two massive water reservoirs in the Sierra Nevada Central region called courtright and wishon. They funnel water up and down a steep gradient between shaver lake and the reservoirs to control peak energy demand. It’s actually a really effective and mostly efficient system, especially when rain and snow refill the upper reservoirs.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 days ago

          Ah yes, an average of 4.84 hours per day running entirely on renewables.

          There’s definitely enough storage to enable that reliably. /s

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        At night is when you release the water in your hydroelectric dams. We need more solar so the dams dont flow when the sun is shining.

    • Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      Jacobson is a fantasist who has been publishing misleading work for years claiming there are no issues with 100% renewables right now (or indead there were no issues 10 years ago).