Reminder that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is made up and the types don’t matter
The perceived accuracy of test results relies on the Barnum effect, flattery, and confirmation bias, leading participants to personally identify with descriptions that are somewhat desirable, vague, and widely applicable.[10] As a psychometric indicator, the test exhibits significant deficiencies, including poor validity, poor reliability, measuring supposedly dichotomous categories that are not independent, and not being comprehensive.[11][12][13][14]
That’s so intj of you
I can only read this as
int_j, like yet another annoying data type someone made up for C.
The dichotomous measuring is what bugs me the most. Whether it is big 5 or this test, I basically always score between 47-53% in most categories (except neuroticism, I always ace this one). So I basically never get the same result twice, because there’s like one question where I put “somewhat agree” instead of “fully agree” this time and boom I am an introvert and not an extrovert.
But it’s already this “agree, disagree, neutral” questions that are so pointless and dichotomous. “Do you enjoy big parties” - well, now or ever? Is alcohol involved, is it late, do I know the people, do I take my kid, is it far away, what is the mood, is it loud, what do I do the next day, is it fun? Are we talking practical or hypothetical? As a teen and young adult I loved big parties and thrived, I love to hang out in big groups of friends, now I am in a new city where I barely know people and I have a toddler, so by the love of God, at 8 pm I am so tired a party is the last thing I want to do. I was invited to one, actually, with a lot of childless, single artists in their early 30s, the party didn’t even start until 9 pm, like, yeah my mind wants to go, but I have nothing in common with these people and I am so tired after a kindergarten christmas market, can’t be arsed. SO DO I LIKE PARTIES OR NOT
This was my exact reasoning when I first heard about the test, and I’ve considered it dogshit for idiots ever since.
It’s just astrology, but with a sciencey flair.
but with a sciencey flair.
Tbh the test at 16personalities has almost no sciency flair at all, as far as I see, its main appeal and likely reason for popularity is the cute illustrations.
So are you INTJ or INTP?
I’m an RTFM
I retook the test and it says I DGAF
The first time I ever took a Myers-Briggs assessment was on paper and every question was A or B. There was one where I was a perfect 50/50 split and could NOT choose a preference for either, so I scored it as .5 for each.
That .5 difference gave me an equal score for introvert and extrovert.
Since then I’ve taken a more professional assessment at work, and it shows how strongly I fit into the category. Like you, they were nearly all ~47-53% between the two.
Some other assessments have been intriguing imo, but Myers-Briggs has never suited me because of their dichotomy BS.
It’s fun, though. I also think people charting my astral card or whatever is fun so make of that what you will.
i mean yeah, it’s an elaborate buzzfeed quizz with a dash of horoscope. i’d hope people don’t get married to their results. it’s just simple fun
it always just feels like a fancy way of saying “i have autism/ADHD symptoms”
horoscope for white girls
Horoscope is already for white girls.
MBTI is more like business astrology.
Are there any good personality psychometric tests?
I don’t think “personality tests” are a good concept, but i had to do something IQ-test-adjacent as part of getting my autism diagnosis and that seems actually useful, showing that i’m really good at everything except working memory, which is good to know.
The Big Five is the … well. Way more realistic than Meyers Brzzz
I think Big 5 is better
If motherfuckers can walk around believing star signs I can have MBTI…
Yes. Better is the NEO-PI.
The real one is called the Big Five because it wasn’t named for the one or two PhD holders who invented it. Big Five’s existence is supported by 100+ independent studies
We all lose when people pretend that bad & outdated science is the best science
say what you will about astrologers, at least they don’t pretend it’s science
They do, though.
INTP? No, I’m actually out of TP
I hate mbti but I lose nothing by it existing so I stay silent
I lose something. I lose a bit of my soul every time a job tries to make us take it or some other horoscope bullshit equivalent.
I’m ENFP but wasn’t popular in high school, studied math, and my whole apartment is clean and organized as fuck. Suck it meme
:(
<3
According to this I’m INTJ, and I just went and spent 5 minutes taking the Myers-Briggs test and got the same result. Yay?
One of us
Aw that’s not accurate. I totally played soccer in high school.
Reads question again
Ohh… do I play sports, present tense, like here in 2025?
Fuck, ok, 100% accuracy confirmed.
Also there’s playing sports and playing sports.
Lmfao spot on.
I didn’t even have to second guess it. No, No, Yes, No. INTP
INTJ, spot on
Lol it’s accurate for me
ESTP, i am refusing to accept that i am identified as an entrepeneur by this. That is an insult against me and my whole family lineage.
Number four doesn’t work for me, but I see how it works for the general descriptions of the qualities. Now I want to take it again and see if I’ve changed over the years.
Edit: I got ENTP ~20 years ago, but just got ENTJ. My room is clean, so your meme stands. Lol
So it’s INFJ, huh
3 out of 4
