silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-210 months agoBiden Expected to Permanently Ban Oil Drilling in Some Federal Waterswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1187arrow-down1external-linkBiden Expected to Permanently Ban Oil Drilling in Some Federal Waterswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-210 months agomessage-square20fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·10 months agoIt’s not that simple; it will require either courts to invalidate part of a law, or congress to change the law
minus-squaretheonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-210 months agoOr the companies to do it anyway, and the president gives police protection to prevent any court officers from enacting any judgement against the company.
minus-squareJeeBaiChow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months agoYeah, except that thanks to the sitouts he now has both.
minus-squareramble81@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoCheck out my comment here It’s entirely possible that’s exactly what will happen.
It’s not that simple; it will require either courts to invalidate part of a law, or congress to change the law
Or the companies to do it anyway, and the president gives police protection to prevent any court officers from enacting any judgement against the company.
Yeah, except that thanks to the sitouts he now has both.
Check out my comment here
It’s entirely possible that’s exactly what will happen.