• MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Of course, tying access to important services like healthcare to employment would be inhumane. You still need a doctor if you are sick, regardless of employment status.

      Edit: And contraceptives are a healthcare thing, and is thus covered. Condoms are a seperate service, but covered and made accessible by the state as well.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        This is what Germany does.

        I ask because US Americans think healthcare in the EU is amazing. Then you realize its illegal not to have healthcare in Germany, and you have to pay for it. Even if you dont have a job.

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            And if you dont quality for unemployment?

            Some people choose to be unemployed. The German system doesn’t really allow for that

            • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s a balance. Either you go on unemployment support and health insurance is covered but you also get nagged by the unemployment agency. Or you spend your savings, get no support and no nags.

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Why not just let me be unemployed, live on my savings, and give me free healthcare? Healthcare is a human right. It should just be free like in Canada or the UK.