A Montreal woman who was told by health-care professionals that she was too young for breast cancer but later diagnosed with it, has died from the disease. Valerie Buchanan was 32 when she died at the end of February.

“I keep asking myself why anyone, but selfishly, why her?” Chris Scheepers, Buchanan’s husband told CTVNews.ca in a telephone interview. “She was a beautiful person. She was extremely driven, talented and positive. What really breaks me is our son won’t know the truly remarkable woman she was.”

Throughout 2020, Buchanan sought answers for a lump in her chest but had said she was reassured by multiple health-care professionals in Ottawa and Montreal that it was a benign cyst without sending her for imaging to confirm.

After 13 months, Buchanan eventually went to a private clinic and was diagnosed with Stage 3 triple-negative breast cancer – a biologically aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Just a few months later, she learned it was Stage 4.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What’s sad is how hard would it have been for just a single one of them to say “…but we should send you for an image just in case”

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Any time my wife has been given the run around by doctors, I usually ask for her to schedule another appointment so I can be there, and I demand the doctors put notes, make something on the record that they SPECIFICALLY ARE DENYING TESTING and the reason behind it before I will leave.

      So far it’s worked every time to get them to just do the goddamn test, take the fucking scan, or do some simple blood work.

      Doctors like that are more afraid of malpractice suits than they are of killing a patient over negligence.

      The first time it happened was because she had cholecystitis and the doctor was insisting she was too young to have any issues with it, but I was older and had already had my gallbladder removed over it several years before. So I knew the signs, I knew the feeling, and I had doctors from the same hospital ignore my symptoms. Once the demand for notes to be recorded, suddenly everyone is all for doing a simple scan and what do you know, her gallbladder is filled with sludge and stones, neither of which should be there, and it’s swelling. A week later it was out, but they wanted to wait 6 months “to wait and see if you’re still having discomfort

      To anyone who has never had gallstones, it’s like someone is taking a glowing hot knife and stabbing you from just above the stomach toward your spine. It’s “discomfort” the way giving birth is “mild pain”

      Demand tests and demand records of test denials. Fear of lawsuits and losing licenses goes a lot further than “you’re a doctor who is supposed to help people get better” to some.

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        That can be effective in the US but would generally not work in Canada where malpractice suits are uncommon.

        In Canada you may have better luck pursuing a complaint to the province’s licensing authority.

        As a healthcare provider (HCP) I would generally try to dissuade patients from exaggerating or overstating. Most doctors and nurses have dealt with enough people that we have a good sense of when someone is exaggerating or even outright lying. Usually it is counterproductive and decreases the chance that your concern or complaint will be addressed appropriately.

        I would advocate for centering the conversation on how symptoms have changed / affected your quality of life. A good HCP would make this part of the coversation but I know that not all of my colleagues do so, especially in light of corporate or governmental pressure to see as many patients in as fast as possible.

        I feel/have _____ when I do _____ and I’m worried that it will continue, impairing my ability to _____ is a general approach.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          As someone who heard several accounts from people with endometriosis, I get the feeling that a lot of healthcare professionals are severely overestimating their own ability to “have a good sense when someone is exagerating”. The stories these women tell are absolutely infuriating, and the diagnosis rate vs prevalence of the disease just as much. Clearly many doctors are simply dismissing complaints about period pain out of hand.

          IDK, I know nothing about healthcare but shouldn’t complaints about pain be objectivized a little bit? Like can’t you just slap me in the face and ask which hurts more? Because I feel like doctors would often be surprised by the kind of pain some chronically ill people put up with without showing any external signs.

          • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            As someone who heard several accounts from people with endometriosis, I get the feeling that a lot of healthcare professionals are severely overestimating their own ability to “have a good sense when someone is exagerating”.

            I’ve had a gynecologist tell his resident that it’s a good idea to train the patients on how to answer questions. It never crossed his mind to listen to women first.

          • shawn1122@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            As a healthcare worker with autoimmune disease and chronic pain, I hear where you’re coming from. The job would be a lot of easier if pain could be measured objectively. Everyone has a different tolerance for pain and chronic pain makes it all the more unpredictable.

            The average time to diagnosis for endometriosis is 4 to 8 years. It’s a notoriously difficult diagnosis that often cant be made definitively without some form of invasive testing (which is taught in medical school). But, regardless of vocation, education cannot completely correct bias and there is lot of room for improvement in healthcare when it comes to women’s health.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The strange thing here is that in America there’s a better chance they might have found it earlier–if only because they’re gung-ho on testing because they can bill for it.

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        My wife had a lump in her breast at… I think 27. They sent her to imaging and took a biopsy, realized it was benign, removed it anyways because it was hurting. The parking tickets were our only cost. This should be the norm.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          If it was IBC there maybe no lump, in ibc The tumor is just formign sheets of cancer cells rather than masses.

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          17 hours ago

          That absolutely should be the norm. There’s no good reason things can’t be this way in modern civilization.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Yes you should, it’s an incredibly privileged mindset to think that public space should be sacrificed so that you can conveniently and freely park your car

            • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              You’ve decided to interpret my comment in your own way.

              There are many options for travel that would not require a car, if the infrastructure were in place, that would then allow people needing a space for a medical reason to have parking available.

              No, you absolutely should not have to pay for parking either when you’re there for a medical reason.

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        In America, you’re more likely to get the test ordered (for a myriad of reasons, billing is one, but also malpractice) but also to have it be denied by insurance.

        In a country like Canada, the challenge would be getting the test ordered but once you do, the only question is when it can be done.

        • Broken@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This is very accurate. Highlights the cons of each system. The grass isn’t always greener.