• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    39 minutes ago

    25 - ⁵/₅ = 25 - 1 = 24

    If you wrote it vertically: 25 - 5 ————— = 24 5

    But once you lay it out on one line, you have to use prins to prioritize addition / subtraction:

    (25 - 5) / 5 = 20 / 5 = 4

    Some YouTube mathematicians deep-dive into this.

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    ASCII hack failure of language. Even in mathematics, ! has multiple meanings like with Boolean NOT. We need a science, math, and language reformation to remove non intuitive narcissistic names, and implied contextual meanings.

  • vaguerant@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I understand why this is wrong (order of operations dictates the division happens first, so it’s really 25 - 1 = 24), but why is it funny? I don’t mean “This isn’t funny,” I think I’m just missing the joke.

    • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The answer in the comic is correct. It’s just written in a way to make you as the reader think he’s got it wrong for a second.

      The ! operator in mathematics indicates a function called a factorial. Four factorial, or 4! = 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 24. Which is the correct answer if you follow the proper order of operations.

  • casmael@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m only going to say this once but if I’m doing a sum and you want me to do it in a specific order, use brackets. That’s what brackets are for. Don’t expect me to do things in a predetermined order because I literally can’t be bothered and I will never care enough to do that. I’m already doing a sum so don’t push it, okay bud

    • stebo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      well then you should stop doing math cuz you’re doing it wrong

      • casmael@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thanks I take enormous pleasure in never doing any maths at all ever, largely for reasons like this 😌

    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But that’s a bit like saying “If you’re going to talk to me, put the adjectives before the nouns,” even in Spanish where they come after. Mathematical notation is a language and it has a syntax. Sure, you can decide to ignore that syntax, or insist that people modify their use of it for you, but it’s not really a reasonable expectation.

      • casmael@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think this is very stupid for a number of reasons. Why is there an order of operations that supersedes the direction the operations are written in? That’s at best dim witted and at worst deliberately misleading. Grog write left to right. Grog read left to right. Grog do sum left to right.

        There is absolutely no reason in the world why anybody should have to know that division comes before subtraction. That’s fucking insane, man. What is the point of writing things down if you’re only going to do them in a set order anyway? May as well have a big jumble of letters and numbers and symbols on the page at that point, like who cares. The whole point of writing things down is to express concepts. Can’t do that with any kind of nuance if you’re going to read it one way anyway, no matter how you write it down. That would be like saying you always pronounce certain letters at the start of words even if they’re in the middle. Completely nuts.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If all people did was simple equations like the one in the OP, you’d probably be right, but math syntax has to deal with all kinds of equations. Your way, I can’t write 3x^2–4x+5. Instead, I’d have to write ((((3x)^2)−4)x)+5. That’s WAY more obnoxious. It’s better to have an unambiguous syntax that covers all the cases and lets me write equations in an more simple form.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Jokes and tricks that hinge on unclear communication (eg: not using parenthesis or other notation to make intent clear), and then are smug when people are tricked, remind me of the old xkcd https://xkcd.com/169/

    I just saw some jokes about factorials so at least I got this one, heh.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        25 - 5 ÷ 5 when read naively left to right looks like it would be “25 - 5 = 20. Then take that and divide by 5, for an answer of 4”. It would be clearer to write it as (25 - 5) ÷ 5 or 25 - (5 ÷ 5) depending on what’s intended.

        You see those kind of “gotcha!” posts online sometimes, where someone posts a problem that tempts you into doing order of operations wrong.

        Someone who sees how to do it correctly immediately and thinks everyone knows that is invited to view https://xkcd.com/2501/ as well.

        • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          People don’t read math like that tho, as you learn the order of operations in year 2. Also, the original post is correct, 25 - 5/5 = 4!

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          How would this work out in a rtl language? Because the reader would be used to parsing language in the opposite direction. Does that mean the same equation has two objectively correct answers?

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Hey, Munroe is a rather cool and very intelligent engineer. Very witty writer, and awful at drawing. But his philosophy is mid at best. He is not an authority, and is often wrong or common place when it comes to social topics and human affairs. He understands communication in a very techy engineering dimension. There’s no need to take his comics as anything but what they are. One white dude’s anecdotic commentary on his own very limited experience of the human condition. He knows squat about human communication, sociology, psychology or postmodernism.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Natively? It’s a math equation there is only one way to read it as far as I am aware.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Naively, not natively. Someone who wasn’t a good math student, or just doesn’t remember, might read it left to right and come to the wrong conclusion. The rules for order-of-operations are, so far as I know, arbitrary, and different people coming at it without instruction (ie: naively) could arrive at different conclusions. Knowing that you’re supposed to do division first isn’t obvious.

            You could read 25 - 5 ÷ 5 as “25 - 5 is 20. 20 divided by 5 is 4” or you could read it (correct, per the standard rules) as “25 minus… hold on… 5 divided by 5 is one. Now 25 subtract that from the 25 sitting over there, and get 24.” This isn’t the same kind of error as, like, “5 divided by 5 is 0”

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              You could read 25 - 5 ÷ 5 as "25 - 5 is 20.

              You could. You could also lower your pants and drop a massive turd and call that the answer. Both answers would be equally wrong.

              PEMDAS isn’t a suggestion that you follow when it suits you, like religion. It’s how math is communicated, unambiguously.

              In any case, if that’s where we lost you, then I’ve calculated the chance of you catching the factorial as √-1.

              • casmael@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                On the extremely rare occasion when I have the misfortune to be performing a mathematical calculation, I take enormous pleasure in carrying out the operations exclusively left to right unless indicated otherwise by brackets, which is the correct way to indicate this. If you want me to do a calculation separately, put brackets around it or bugger off. It’s your choice, really

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                You’re being weirdly aggressive, but okay.

                Most people know the symbols for addition subtraction multiplication and division. Far fewer people know the established order of operations. That’s what powers those “only 3% of people solve this problem correctly!” math memes.

                But okay. Communicate badly (ie: by failing to acknowledge your audience’s context) and be smug if you want.

                • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  You do realize your “You’re communicating badly” attitude is the only smugness happening here, right?