• The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The vapors of hexane are highly explosive. There have been several industrial accidents caused by them.

      All they had to do was to have the tanks leak a small amount to build up vapors in the back of the truck. Then trigger a small ignition source to ignite them.

      This would cause the initial blast and light all the liquid on fire. The high heat generated by the fire damaged the bridge further.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s like gasoline, basically. Actually, there’s a lot of it in gasoline. The thing is it’s tricky getting just the right fuel-air mix for something like that to blow up. I wonder if there was additional high explosive inside to disperse it first.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I assumed this is just a mistranslation or a mixup, since hexogen and hexane do sound similar. For those of you not in the know, hexogen is also known as cyclonite or RDX and it’s what makes eg. C4 or Semtex go boom, while hexane is a very boring (in comparison) organic compound that doesn’t go boom nearly as much.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh, that’s really cool! It uses the fuel itself as a fuse to time the explosion. Hexane is a liquid, though, so the same principle wouldn’t quite work.

        I’m buying that it was a mistranslation of “hexogen” (the high explosive RDX) at this point.