• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Because there is choice. There is very little choice on Windows or Mac, so there’s not really anything to argue about 😅 Champagne problems, if ya ask me.

  • squid64@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There is drama in everything. I don’t think GNU/Linux is any different. I don’t really care about what distro other people use tbh, I can joke about it but never seriously argue for which distro, text editor, programming language, etc. is the best. I just like that I can choose and get just what I want.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It really doesn’t. I highly doubt there isn’t office politics going on inside Microsoft, Apple and Google, but unlike them, Linux development is all public. If anything, that’s likely to curtail a lot of bad behavior rather than encourage it.

  • mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s sane to have drama. It means we have humans doing the job and power dynamics being discussed. If there’s no drama, it means some people got shut down.

  • False@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Because there are a lot of people with different goals that conflict with each other? Which is true in lots and lots of other things.

  • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    It doesn’t really, not compared to what goes on in the office. What little there is, is in public and often exaggerated by commentators.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thats the Point of having an Open Source OS where everyone can have a voice. So you can talk about something if its a pile of dogshit.

    Is the next video going to be „Why is there so much drama in the bundestag“?