Some weird, German communist, hello. He/him pronouns and all that. Obsessed with philosophy and history, secondarily obsessed with video games as a cultural medium. Also somewhat able to program.

https://abnormalbeings.space/

https://liberapay.com/Wxnzxn/

  • 54 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 4 days ago
cake
Cake day: March 6th, 2025

help-circle

  • Der ursprüngliche zentrale Zweck davon war genau, dass sie frei lizenziert ist und es somit erlaubt und erwünscht ist, dass sich mit der Zeit viele Forks davon bilden, sodass es eine größere Diversität an Informationsquellen gibt.

    Jetzt ist sie die “letzte Bastion gemeinsamer Realität”. Wo ist die Welt eigentlich falsch abgebogen?

    Hauptsächlich wohl dort, wo eine Fragmentierung das System noch anfälliger machen würde. Schon jetzt sind eben gerade noch genug aktive Editierende und Moderierende dort, die das System absichern. Ist ein bisschen wie Software-Forks. Was macht z. B. Librewolf oder Waterfox, falls niemand mehr den Upstream-code bei Firefox wartet, und dieser plötzlich mit Sicherheitslücken gespickt wird, für deren Entfernung das Team zu klein geworden ist?

    Mirrors von Wikipedia gibt es durchaus, aber meistens so als halbes Privatprojekt von Enthusiasten, oft einfach zu Hause auf nem Homeserver oder so. Also, eine statische “Stand 2025”-Kopie ließe sich wahrscheinlich im worst case erstmal wiederherstellen. Ohne ein funktionierendes, großes Team aber leider verdammt dazu, langsam irrelevanter zu werden.

    Eine “größere Diversität” an Informationsquellen gibt es ja schon auch, nur leider halt meistens eher Sachen wie “Conservapedia” oder ähnliche Versuche, Meinung und Fakt viel offensichtlicher zu vermischen. Na ja - zumindest Informationsquellen jenseits von Popkultur. Tatsächlich gibt es zu Hobbyisten- und Popkulturthemen ja unzählige, teilweise extrem tiefgehende Wikis, die durchaus auch Informationsquelle sind.

    Also, in dem Fall würde ich sagen, war das Ideal verkennend, wie viel Arbeit das alles dann in der Realität erfordern wird, so dass am Ende Ableger - zumindest welche, die eine derartige Qualität aufrecht erhalten können - nicht mehr so ganz realistisch wurden.













  • From the little that seems to be available at the time of this comment, it feels like someone confused and disturbed, not like a properly planned-out-attempt at anything.

    The Secret Service received information from local police about an alleged “suicidal individual” who was traveling from Indiana and found the man’s car and a person matching his description nearby.

    “As officers approached, the individual brandished a firearm and an armed confrontation ensued, during which shots were fired by our personnel,” the Secret Service said in a statement.

    The man was hospitalized. The Secret Service said his condition was “unknown.”

    Oh, please, oh please, I hope it won’t be (succesfully) used for even more repression.





  • Basically: Resident enfranchisement. It’s weird, when people born in our country and having lived here their whole life can’t vote outside of local elections. My own father, for example, had a Dutch background, and was never allowed to vote in federal elections until his death. (Neither he nor I even spoke/speak a single phrase of Dutch)

    Yes, things have gotten somewhat better and easier with applications for citizenship, but that there are hurdles like that to begin with, is a bit… weird.


  • archive.ph - link without registration wall

    The investments are being placed through opaque structures known as special-purpose vehicles, which have the benefit of concealing the investors’ identities, to avoid the ire of US authorities and companies wary of Chinese capital during a nadir in relations between the two countries.

    Asset managers behind the deals have told investors that the entities are specifically designed to avoid disclosure. The use of special-purpose vehicles in financing is commonplace and there is nothing illegal about the arrangements.

    Still, it raises concerns about the potential for undue influence and conflicts of interest at a time when Musk has unprecedented involvement in US policy, politics and business.

    Funnily enough, to me personally, there are more questions about what this means concerning Chinese politics and conflicts of interests in the future. The country is not without its own tensions, after all.

    The inflow of Chinese capital into Musk’s business empire is primarily profit-driven and has little to do with technology transfer or influencing public policy, according to people involved in the transactions.

    With a sluggish domestic economy, wealthy Chinese are looking abroad for investment opportunities.

    To me, personally, it serves as a reminder that no amount of red flags waved or social-democratic laws saying “wealth is going to serve the interests of the working class” makes a country communist, only material realities can.