I have not found any news article on this on a whim. Because my friends and family, I need to use Facebook Messenger, and Messenger Lite was a OK client - lightweight, no unnecessary features, etc., compared to the regular Messenger app.

Now I’m a little torn, having a Meta app on my phone is already bad, but having to downgrade to the bloated Messenger app? Not sure I will make a change. What are your thoughts?

  • @Birdcatname@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    691 year ago

    Ever since Facebook forced the separate Messenger app, I’ve refused to install it. Instead, when I see a message notification, I pop into a browser, head to Facebook.com and push the desktop version. While it’s clunky, I’ve never had to download Messenger.

    • @Carter@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Separate messaging app was the best thing they ever did. I’ve not had Facebook installed since.

      • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        351 year ago

        You’re still using their shit, just in a very inconvenient way. In fact, you’re going to their site that contains targeted ads rather than using an ad free app. What a strange hill to die on.

        • @MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          I have exactly one group that insists on communicating this way. Which is why this isn’t a big inconvenience for me. Your point is well taken, but doesn’t really apply in my case. I’m not a user of the service, which is why it’s so easy for me to refuse to install it, and hopefully I can use this to pressure the group to move to discord or some other means of communication. But if not I will continue to use the desktop site rather than install an app.

          • @Ulijin@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            I’m in the exact same position as you and take the same approach. It’s a hill I’m getting a mildly stubbed toe on.

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I’d rather have a slight inconvenience of seeing their ads on their website for the few moments I’d need to send a message than having their spyware of an app tracking everything I do all day long.

          • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Not only is that not possible on both Android and iPhone nowadays, that’s a myth that’s never been remotely proven.

                • Man, this is the single most ignorant comment I’ve seen regarding Facebook. You’ve never wondered how a company that offers a free product makes billions?

                  If that list didn’t have anything on it except “location”, I’d still say that you’re wrong about them not tracking you. How can you read all of the other things on that list and not realize that selling your data is how they make money?

                • Vrabielley 🪶
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I mean… they’re pretty much telling you right upfront that they are. Just sitting there and saying “nuh uh” when the privacy policy is right there to make yourself feel better about using their products is fine, but don’t try to persuade other more privacy savvy individuals otherwise.

    • @twistedtxb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Why? I mean it’s much better to have the messenger app without all the facebook BS.

      Its very easy to disregard facebook in 2023, but Messenger is still one of the more prominent messaging app.

    • @Chriskmee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I hate to say this, but Facebook Messenger is one of the most fully featured messaging apps. It has its own internal messaging standard that offers iMessage like features between Facebook users, and it also is one of the better SMS apps out there.

      I can see why they make it its own app, it’s supposed to replace other messaging apps.

    • WashedOver
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Same here. I wish Disa messenger app was maintained as it was my one stop shop for a few messenger apps.

    • I need NOS
      link
      fedilink
      271 year ago

      Yes, and they constantly change how parts of the UI work, most often getting more in the way of efficient actual messaging… It’s really bad.

    • YMS
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They cut the size down to 30 MB on iOS in 2019, but they’re back to 110 since (on Android, it’s 60 MB).

      EDIT: In terms of updates, they are pretty stable at one update a week on both systems.

  • @Jimbo@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    And they put a notification on your phone about it that you can’t remove… this infuriates me more than it should

    • @Suppoze@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      You’re right, I did not even notice the persistent notification! What a unnecessarily annoying move. This deserved an early bird uninstall for me…

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At least on my phone I could swipe the notification a bit to the left to reveal the cog, “disable notifications”, and disable the “standard” category of notifications.

      In other news, there’s no way in hell I’m installing the full app. People texting me there will just have to wait until I’m by a computer.

      • varaki
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yes, but that is the same notification category as your default one for messages, so disabling it will result in no message notifications at all.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Yeah I just turned off every notification from Messenger Lite after seeing that. Next month I might just uninstall it completely, or opt for the Matrix bridge.

    • clb92
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Another reason my phone is rooted. I want to have the final say in whether I can remove a notification or not on my phone.

    • @Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I’m also on the uninstall boat with y’all, for this reason. Lucky me, I haven’t used messenger in a year so when I saw the notification didn’t hesitate. Haven’t logged on FB in years so I doubt anyone will try to reach me there.

  • @agent_flounder@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    I swear my battery life improved after I uninstalled messenger for a while and got worse after reinstalling recently.

    I wouldn’t have installed it except I was in the process of getting back in touch with a few old friends. Was totally worth it for that.

    • @tiwenty@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I’m on the same page. I would prefer not having those apps installed or even an account, but my friends are more worth to me than my IT ideals.

      • WagesOf
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        It’s too bad that your friendship isn’t more important than ten minutes of inconvenience for them to install a different app or to give you their actual phone number.

        • @tiwenty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I find that you’re making a lot of assumptions on my friendships based on my 4 lines comment.

          I do chat with my friends via SMS or phone cause I indeed have their number. But you can’t deny that SMS for group chats is pretty gruesome.

          Based on that, everybody is used to those popular chat apps and have their other group chats on them. Why would I make them change when they work for what’s intended? Privacy is the best argument, but they may not all care enough to not find it bothering. So I don’t bother ¯_(ツ)_/¯

          • Rekorse
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            They dont work for what’s intended. Its an illusion to pull money from your content and your potential ad revenue.

            Thats not getting into any of the other sociological effects of a huge amount of people getting their daily news from Facebook message headlines.

        • @Notnotmike@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          It’s exactly what social media platforms, particularly Facebook, want. They want you to feel locked in because your friends are there

          I don’t know why people don’t just use more SMS. You don’t need all the fancy bells and whistles, it shouldn’t change the conversation you’re having, especially with the gradual rollout of rich messages, and it has a wider audience than Facebook will ever have. More people have SMS than have Facebook

            • I’m not on board with sms being a better service in general, but it’s kind of difficult to argue that other messaging services are superior when sms is the only one designed to be accessible without internet access.

            • @Notnotmike@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Everyone outside of the U.S. almost assuredly still has SMS capabilities, it’s just not common utilized because everyone is already on WhatsApp or Telegram. It’s where their friends are, locking them into the ecosystem, which is exactly what I just said. And I would be willing to wager the only reason WhatsApp really got huge was because SMS hasn’t always been free to use and may still not be free in some countries and with some plans.

              Telegram, Signal and WhatsApp are fine, as for privacy how exactly are SMS better?

              I wasn’t speaking to privacy specifically, but where all your friends are.

              If you want privacy, then you shouldn’t be using Facebook Messenger or WhatsApp anyway, considering both are owned by Meta and their privacy track record is shaky at best.

              Signal is a great choice, but we get back to the main point where not everyone is on Signal, and once you are on Signal you’re locked in to using Signal and must have their app to participate in the conversation.

              My point wasn’t that SMS is better, but it’s simpler and more widely available and doesn’t require a standalone application to use.

              Ideally we would use an open standard like the Matrix standard to communicate, that way you can download whatever application you want and have all the privacy you could ever desire, but not have to download some random messaging application just to catch up from Gary from primary school

              • WagesOf
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                I wish matrix would catch on too. Basically every non US app is still tied to a damn phone number for auth, so it’s not better than sms for mobility anyway.

    • WashedOver
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I’ve found the same thing with the IG and FB apps which is why I don’t use them. I stick to the mobile web versions but they have made it difficult to message from the android mobile web without extra steps like desktop mode. Even then there can be missing functionality.

      There was also an article earlier this year where they were purposely “testing” the apps that forcibly drained some user batteries quickly without a care for the actual users affected. Since I’m often using my phone for navigation in the woods I want as much battery life as possible please.

      Anyways if it wasn’t for older friends and family members I would no longer be using FB.

      • Vrabielley 🪶
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        People always say “family and friends…” but, just hear me out, what if you don’t need to be in constant contact with people you would have naturally moved on from?

      • WashedOver
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Certainly a argument can be made for this. For me it is the extended family and contacts from hobbies /sports. Without FB they would have completely faded out of my life. This low level method maintains a loose family connections once maintained by the senior family members that have long since passed. As for the others yes completely disappear from your life…

    • SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Of course it did. They’re tracking everything you do, and everywhere you go, even when the app isn’t running. Don’t believe me? Install the Duck Duck Go browser and enable App Tracking Protection. You will be shocked by the amount of shit so many apps track in the background, but Facebook is one of the worst.

    • @Notnotmike@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      It sounds like a too good to be true situation. Definitely an interesting concept though. Sounds like they use remote servers to connect to the third-party apps using your credentials and then transcribe the messages using the Matrix protocol to the app. Source here and snippet below

      Beeper consists of two main components:

      • A client app that runs on your devices.
      • A web service run by Beeper.

      … Beeper’s web service consists of a Matrix homeserver and infrastructure to run open source bridges that connect to 15 different chat networks.

      Currently free but also will be a Plus version eventually rolling out, according to the FAQ

      For now, everyone has access to all the features of Beeper Plus for free. At some point in 2023, we will begin charging $5-10 per month for Beeper Plus.

      Also, no humor is lost on the fact that it is dangerously close to Wuph from The Office…

      • @bananahammock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I signed up for beeper, but realized you can self host a matrix server that uses the same bridges between these chat services.

        I was skeptical at first, but it’s been super solid and refreshing to have a single chat app for everything.

    • @smeeps@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I signed up for this month’s ago and I’m still not in. Every time I log into the app to check my waitlist, I’m some random number in the 3000s, and not always lower than last time. Why is this do you know?

      • @Ragincloo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I’ve never heard of beeper, but it sounds pretty inaccessible from what your saying. Is there something that makes it worth it? Or is it just another messaging app that nobody I need to speak with is using?

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I believe Beeper is Matrix under the hood. They have just made it more accessible with a new interface and pre-installed bridges.

        • @banjoman05@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Just signed up myself, about 40k in line it seems. Sounds like reinventing Trillian/Gaim/Pidgin/etc…

          • @steltek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It’s a modern take on the Pidgin concept. Pidgin ran locally on one computer and didn’t sync anything between any of your other Pidgin installs. Also, your login details for every account were usually in plaintext on disk. In practice, it feels

            Beeper (really Matrix + bridges) is a network service that you can access with a browser, mobile app, whatever.

      • @Unsustainable@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I signed up when it was first announced over a year ago. As of a couple months ago I still hadn’t gotten approved. I signed up again and within a couple days I got approved. You should try signing up again.

  • @Deestan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    This sucks.

    Can’t ditch it completely due to family, but got a few more contacts over on Signal after this announcement.

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Just log in to Facebook on desktop every couple of days. If they want speedy responses, they will know yto try an aternative medium.

    • fades
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      If people are still playing within meta’s walls they are lost and won’t be leaving anytime soon.

      But all my friends are on there! M-m-my followers!!!

      They didn’t miss the boat, they straight up ignored it. Nothing has changed so why should their poorly reasoned decision?

  • @lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Or install an app called Metal.

    It’s a wrapper for the mobile webpage with all the intrusive permissions disabled by default.

    • @d3lta19@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I just looked for this app and it looks like it hasn’t been updated since 2018. Am I wrong?

      • @AgnosticMammal@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Try Hermit on Android then. You’re looking for a PWA wrapper app that lets you add them to your homescreen. Then again, your Android web browser should already have this with the “Add to homescreen” feature.

  • MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Matrix with a facebook messenger bridge? I know just the one finnish instance that offers bridging (pikaviestin.fi), though. I host my own home server.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Wow. Rough.

        It’ll be a good excuse to make anyone who wants to talk to you, use something else.

          • MentalEdge
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            No. Due to how whatsapp works, you have to have a phone with whatsapp installed, somewhere.

            The matrix bridge connects to that, and “puppets” your account, bringin those chats into your matrix account.

            Matrix can bridge to a ton of different chat services, but each one can work a little differently. They usually don’t support voice and video.

            Matrix is what’s behind the scenes for beeper, for example.

    • @jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Old people are there, some we care about, some have passed away…

      There are a few decent communities out there too. Not many, but a few.

    • Owl
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      In many countries it’s the default communication app

      • @acastcandream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s the only reason I use it and, as much as I hate to admit it, it’s really well done/seamless/painless to use. Literally the only good think on FB (until they inevitably ruin it too). Has fantastic consumer protections.

    • The only and I say the only good thing I can say about Facebook Messenger is… umm…

      Can somebody name at least one thing? Really, this app is shit but we must find one at least.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        At least in Australia it’s by far the most popular messenger app. It wins by a landslide thanks to the network effect.

        • Irina
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Yeah, there’s no real alternative here. Use messenger or Don’t talk to people.

        • Because we have standards for at least 20 years for messaging I think we can’t say that networking effect is upside of some app, but rather the fact that everyone must use the same app is a downside.

      • @realharo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Yes, people using it as the main messaging app is still preferable to the situation in the US where people on different mobile platforms can’t message each other without bullshit compatibility issues and bubble colors.

        At least here it doesn’t matter what platform you’re on - including desktops and the web - and as a result nobody cares.

        Of course, the same is true for almost every other messaging service too, and there are better ones out there.

      • @Overzeetop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Facebook Messenger is probably the closest thing to a modern Yellow Pages as we have. Not everybody is on there, but most people are - even if they haven’t checked their profile in years. With the fall of landlines, it can be the easiest (or only) way to find/contact someone - especially if you’re a GenX or early Millennial because we have all dropped out landlines, but we created most of our social connections before any other messaging service existed. Heck, almost none of the people I knew from college in the 90s even had an email address that they stuck with (assuming I actually had email logs going back thirty years). It’s nice that so many message services exist, but most have no way to “look someone up” the way it’s possible to do on something like messenger/fb. (admittedly - it’s both good and bad)

        I suppose there’s a chance that LinkedIn is the other major database of real names out there; I’ve never tried it for locating people.

      • @jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Some of my late mum’s friends only use Facebook. Not saying it’s ideal, but… a single good thing, right?

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Back when people used Facebook, it was a convenient way to connect people to chats quickly and easily. I don’t think that’s the case anymore though.

        • It isn’t. Adding someone is always digging through people with the same name and searching for “that one with glasses on profile picture”. There are some codes to scan, but they are Facebook’s custom format incompatible with QR code scanners and inconvinient to use.

  • @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Would beeper be a better solution for you? Self-hosted beeper, and a matrix client on your phone.