An album to outline a few comments I have received within the past 3 days:
(content warning: extremely toxic and sour comments, genocide denial)
https://imgur.com/a/d63ohQM
(yes, I cherry picked the ones that are either rude or in denial of genocide. I
had to, or else the list would have gotten too long. If you want to see the
entirety of their replies, you should check out my comment history and click on
each link to see their replies.)
TL;DR: Hexbears deny the genocide against Uyghurs in China. They laugh at and dismiss the idea that China is a dictatorship. Having those opinions is fine, but they personally insult the people with whom they don’t agree using annoying emojis and terms like troll, shit, shithead, Nazi apologist, colonial comprador, freak, rabid imperialist westerners, condescending dickbag, disingenuous idiot, unimaginative impotent weasel, losers, etc. They say that other people’s claims are rooted in dishonest bullshit. One of them even said, “nothing you say has any value, and you deserve no regard.” I would say about 33% of them are overly pugnacious and feed on the misery of others. Federating with them brings us more trouble than benefits. The sheer number of other instances that chose to block them is more than enough to prove this.
As the recent discussion about Hexbear unfold and with the megathread locked, I figured I should make a post detailing my experience I’ve had recently with Hexbears and why I believe that defederation from them is better for lemm.ee.
Denial of the persecution of Uyghurs in China
Many Hexbears (see the linked album for screenshots of their comments) reject the idea that there is such an atrocity going on in their ideal country (China). They describe such a claim as preposterous. They say that me “lying about the genocide” is the holocaust denial I’m being accused of. Their excuses are basically always one of the following:
- Andrian Zenz, a Nazi apologist, claimed that there is. He is a nazi apologist thus his claims must be false. Therefore there is no genocide in Xinjiang. (More on this later.)
- You can’t provide any proof so there must be no genocide. (I can understand not accepting things without proof. I do that often, too. But they are simply not even open to the idea that there might be such a thing happening.)
- A UN fact finding mission once claimed that there is no such thing happening in Xinjiang. Therefore the persecution must be fabricated.
One person admitted that there are vocational schools (more commonly known as re-education camps) but that their purpose are to lift people out of poverty. They also claimed that the large number of women who use IUDs are due to them becoming more educated and they voluntarily to implant such devices to not be used as slaves by men. Totally not forced by the government. Another user even attacked my claims by saying that my claims are based on “racism.”
I believe that their idea that the UN does not support the claims of the oppression in Xinjiang is outdated. I strongly recommend Hexbears read this report (at least the overall assessment on page 43) by The UN human rights office (OHCHR) addressing the human rights concerns in Xinjiang from 2022-08-31: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/countries/2022-08-31/22-08-31-final-assesment.pdf. A quote from its overall assessment, page 43: (emphasis mine)
Serious human rights violations have been committed in XUAR [Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region] in the context of the Government’s application of counter-terrorism and counter-“extremism” strategies. The implementation of these strategies, and associated policies in XUAR has led to interlocking patterns of severe and undue restrictions on a wide range of human rights. These patterns of restrictions are characterized by a discriminatory component, as the underlying acts often directly or indirectly affect Uyghur and other predominantly Muslim communities.
I am looking forward to hearing what explanations Hexbears will come up with to prove that this report by the UN, the UN that you once cited, is fabricated and that China is treating its Uyghurs well.
Enough debate about whether the persecution is true. I don’t want this post about Hexbear to devolve into an argument about whether the Uyghurs in China are being oppressed.
Ignorance of the fact that China is a dictatorship
Several Hexbears have attacked me for calling China a dictatorship. They label China democratic and willing to listen to the people’s voices. They do lots of PR for China. How do they even believe that there is any degree of democracy in a country that regular silences topics on its social network? I have, really, nothing against communism, but I do have a lot against dictatorships, and China is a prime example of a dictatorship. They control what their citizens can see on the Internet, monitor every communication happening through their messaging apps, and often detains, without trial, dissidents who dare to call out the government for its wrongdoings. It’s literally 1984. (I actually have read that book, and I am using this phrase in a non-ironic manner.) Yet Hexbears are completely unwilling to accept this fact solely because China happens to fit into the socialist ideal that Hexbears covet.
Ad hominem attacks
Another thing people often dislike about Hexbears is that they often resort to ad hominem attacks when they can’t win an argument. Just in the last 3 days, I have heard the following terms thrown at me: troll, shit, shithead, baby brain, Nazi apologist, colonial comprador, freak, nerd, rabid imperialist westerners, condescending dickbag, disingenuous idiot, and unimaginative impotent weasel. They love calling people names.
In addition, one user repeatedly claim that my comments are made “deliberately to start shit.” Another said that “my opinions does not deserve to be heard” in response to me saying that my reason for leaving so many comments is just to voice my opinions. One even said, “Nothing you say has any value, and you deserve no regard.”
At least 20% of Hexbears are immediately hostile and condescending toward people of different opinions. This behavior is unacceptable, and I’m pretty sure that it breaks almost every Lemmy instance rules ever, as well as Hexbear’s Code of Conduct: (emphasis mine)
We will ban you if you insult, demean or harass anyone. That is not welcome behavior.
(I am also certain that this is a violation of two lemm.ee’s rules: no abusive language and no bigotry. Just in case you didn’t know (because I didn’t know either), the definition of “bigot” is “one who is strongly partial to one’s own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.” (emphasis mine))
Nevertheless, I have yet to see mods removing those insults, much less banning anyone. I have reported some of the provocative comments, yet none of them seems to have been removed. It seems like the mods does not really care whether anyone outside Hexbear or those whose ideologies they don’t agree with is insulted. I guess that anyone only includes Hexbears. I also invite people to view my comment history to judge whether what I said deserved mistreatment like this. I would say no, but don’t take my word for it. Please, do check it out yourself.
To quote our admin @sunaurus@lemm.ee:
Just as we remove bigoted content from lemm.ee, I have also witnessed bigoted content being removed from hexbear.
I don’t think that the bigoted content on Hexbear are being removed quickly enough, if at all.
False Nazi apologist labeling
In my recent exchanges with Hexbears, I have also been called a Nazi apologist numerous times. This is a really serious allegation, so serious that I felt the need to give it a section of itself in this post. For what I have been called a Nazi apologist? A quote from one of my comments (note that it was not edited):
[Zenz] is a liar and Nazi sympathiser
I just clicked that link and, wow, that tweet was quite stupid. He should not have said that. What the Nazis did was unexcusable. However, please keep this in mind - that being a Nazi sympathizer does not automatically invalidate one’s opinions on other topics.
Basically, what happened was that the post I linked to for the purpose of backing up my claim that there were genocide happening in Xinjiang, happened to heavily cite Andrian Zenz. At the time of writing that comment, I did not know that Zenz was a Nazi sympathizer. After a few hours, some Hexbears pointed it out, and I sent the comment quoted above as my reply. I think I have made it pretty clear that while I condemn Zenz fatuous remarks on Nazis, I still believe that his observations about Xinjiang are not necessarily incorrect. However, numerous Hexbears gripped on to this point and repeatedly attacked and slandered me for defending Nazi apologia or outright claiming that I am a Nazi apologist.
I did not defend Nazi apologia or Nazi apologists. All I did was defend the claim that there is genocide going on in Xinjiang. Yet Hexbears seemed to very much swallowed the disinformation that their fellow comrades were spreading.
“Nazi apologist” is a really serious accusation and should not have been used so rashily by those Hexbears. The fact that they even had the audacity to claim such a thing before reading my original comment is another sign that Hexbears are generally too eager to argue. I strongly condemn their behavior and facetious remarks.
If this doesn’t sufficiently prove that a sizable portion of Hexbear is aggressively toxic, I don’t know what will. Therefore, I am in full support of defederation from Hexbears. (I was once actually against this (just 10 days ago), but guess what changed my mind?) The admins of Hexbear have shown little to no interest in removing hate speech on their platform. (I believe that they removed the hate speech targeting our admin mostly for show.) Sure, there are some thoughtful users there, but I am afraid that they will have to ask their admins to solve the problem at hand—toxicity toward others. When the admins one day succeed in putting a stop to the burning hate speech there or when Lemmy devs add the feature for blocking entire instances a feature to users (whichever comes first), maybe we can then consider refederation.
If anyone actually read through the entirety of my long ass post, thank you.
Response to the Hexbear Federation Megathread
To our dear admin Sunaurus,
First, I want to thank you for your dedication and effort you have spent on this instance. I appreciate how much you have contributed to the community without expecting much in return.
I have read through the entire post titled Hexbear Federation Megathread (not including the comments obviously). I understand that you want to keep a freer federation policy and do not want to defederate from anyone easily. However, I still believe that the benefits of federating with them does not outweigh the hate speech they bring.
If we judge any larger instance only by bigoted posts that some of its users make, then we might as well declare all instances as cesspools and close down Lemmy completely. I believe it’s far more useful to judge instances based on moderation in response to such content.
I would argue that the percentage of bigoted posts on Hexbear is significantly larger than any Lemmy instance, including lemmygrad.ml. Take these two instances as a comparison. They share pretty much the same ideology, but people on lemmygrad.ml are generally more kind to other people. Let’s look at an example. @johndoe@lemm.ee leaves a comment “oh no they are increasing the tax rate? what are they even using my money for?” on some post. The typical lemmygrad.ml response would detail why they are increasing tax rates. The typical hexbear.net response, though, would sharply criticize @johndoe@lemm.ee’s comment and use needless, rude questions to point out that of course the government needs more tax.
This is also why defederation from Hexbear would not “result in the flattening of opinions” on news communities, as some have suggested. We still have lemmygrad.ml.
As you too have seen, there were 1906 comments on that megathread before you locked it and deleted some (36) comments. By viewing the same thread on another instance that has defederated from Hexbear, we can know that there are approximately 1400 of those being from Hexbear. Don’t you think that this is a bit ridiculous? That a post on lemm.ee has more comments from another instance? You probably locked the thread for the same reason.
As to the Kremlin propaganda, I agree with your concerns about it. In a way, this is just like me worrying about the Chinese propaganda that China is very democratic, so I can fully understand your feelings. They just keep insisting that those countries are fine because they are socialist. If this isn’t bigotry, what is?
However you decide to approach this sticky problem with Hexbears, I want you to know that I am very appreciative of your work.
Edit 1: at time of writing a user also posted the following remarks:
Edit 2: some people don’t seem to know what “megathread” I was referring to. Here is a link: https://lemm.ee/post/4543536
Edit 3: as I kind of have expected, Hexbear users are casually ignoring the proof they have been asking for the whole time of the persecution toward Uyghurs in Xinjiang. In case anyone missed it in the post, here it is again: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/countries/2022-08-31/22-08-31-final-assesment.pdf.
Edit 4: some Hexbears noticed my proof. And now they are attacking the fact that I am calling it “genocide” but the report did not. You are talking as if you always knew that there were persecution against them in the first place but you chose to turn a blind eye to it.
Edit 5: In reply to Edit 4, I just realized that the group of people who acknowledged the proof I provided did not refute my claims of the persecution in Xinjiang in the first place. Sorry.
Edit 6: At 2023-08-28 14:20 (UTC) an admin decided to lock this post due to the increasing number of reports. In general I am glad about this because this spares me from the hundreds of replies that I probably will get in my inbox tomorrow morning if it were not locked.
Edit 7: As @impiri@lemm.ee pointed out, there was an unpaired parenthesis in my post. I just fixed it. Looking back at that sentence reminds me of Lisp code.
Edit 8: To anyone who didn’t know what Hexbear: if you judge them to be not that toxic after reading the comments on this post, please keep in mind that the admins of lemm.ee have removed some of them.
Edit 9: Fixed a grammar error.
Edit 10: Look at Hexbears making fun of 9/11: https://hexbear.net/post/567620
You collected over 40 screenshots of people on a forum you don’t like and made a huge post of multiple paragraphs with citations.
I want to say this in the most polite way possible. This isn’t healthy at all. If you’re not having a good time on a forum, just don’t talk to people who you vehemently disagree with. Or just go outside. You shouldn’t be obsessing over internet arguments for days or weeks.
You’re just going to have live with the fact some people disagree with you and you’re not able to change everyone’s mind.
Thank you. You are among one of the nobler Hexbears. I will take your advice.
A good rule of thumb is this: If you spend more than like 10 to 15 minutes writing a forum post, especially if you’re trying to win an argument, try to ask yourself what you’re doing with your time. Try to see if you can be doing something better for yourself.
However, please keep this in mind - that being a Nazi sympathizer does not automatically invalidate one’s opinions on other topics.
If you think that Nazis are worth sympathy, then you’ve demonstrated that your decision-making ability is warped enough that it does invalidate your other opinions.
Holy shit lol what an incredible self own/admission of being a Nazi.
His argument itself is in bad faith. “The Chinese are Nazis because a Nazi sympathiser said so”. No shit he’s getting shat on.
To be fair, you guys argue in bad faith as well right now. The statement is factually correct. A person with one wrong belief can still be correct about something else. Otherwise by your logic all vegetarians are nazis as well because Hitler didn’t eat meat either.
nazi sympathizers don’t get good faith because they’re excusing people who want to wipe many of us from the face of the earth. I don’t care about how right their opinions are - they’re my enemies.
but he’s not excusing the nazi apologist, he just accidentally quoted them on an unrelated topic and then distanced himself upon learning they were an apologist.
saying we should take a nazi seriously on their point that the asiastics are devilish is nazi apologia - Zenz isn’t merely an apologist, he’s straight up a christofascist.
I think I have made it pretty clear that while I condemn Zenz fatuous remarks on Nazis, I still believe that his observations about Xinjiang are not necessarily incorrect.
That is not distancing themselves from the Nazi sympathizer. They’re listening to all of the propaganda the Nazi sympathizer puts out, rejecting the parts that don’t support their specific narrative, and keeping the rest.
Theoretically he could still be right but there is no reason to believe he is. He doesn’t speak any local languages, has never done any fieldwork in the region, and his methodology/analysis is extremely unscientific and poor. I would encourage you to read his articles and see for yourself-it’s based on extremely shoddy and weak correlations w/ no serious causal connection whatsoever. I was honestly shocked at how poor the “scholarship” was considering how many people take it seriously.
There’s obviously extensive evidence of persecution and forced cultural assimilation, but that is not genocide. These things matter.
“Being a Nazi means your testimony is not worth hearing outside of a courtroom” =/= “If you believe anything a Nazi also happened to believe, that means you are a Nazi”
You invoke logic, but the formal relation is completely different.
Crazy high reading on the rn
I applaud OP for the the citations and research. I appreciate his linking to the UNHRC report, but nowhere in that report does it mention “genocide”. I’d honestly like people to compare it to multiple UNHRC reports on US treatment of its black population.
I’m no expert, maybe China is taking an overly heavy hand in Xinjiang. But to call it a genocide when no evidence exists for mass killing, and when the US war on terror lead to 5 million actual deaths, is absurd projection and and diminishes the value of the word “genocide”.
Thanks. I am aware of the George Floyd incident and the numerous others African-Americans killed for no good reason.
Yes, in hindsight, calling that genocide with no real evidence of direct killing is a bit too much. But the report I linked to mentioned coercive birth control and internment or imprisonment for violations of the family planning policy (page 35). While that indeed is not genocide per se, it does seem to bring what China is doing one step toward that direction.
Yes, in hindsight, calling that genocide with no real evidence of direct killing is a bit too much.
👍
But the report I linked to mentioned coercive birth control and internment or imprisonment for violations of the family planning policy (page 35).
Your interpretation is much stronger than the report: ‘but remained “seriously concerned about reported instances of the use of coercive measures, including forced abortion and forced sterilization, with a view to limiting births”’. I’m not even saying that it isn’t happening. But if it was a massive problem, you’d think there’d be more than reports. There are mobile phones and foreign tourists in Xinjiang, it’s not like the government would be able to forcibly abort 10% of babies there without someone taking a smartphone video of the abortion police coming to their home.
I’m reminded that forced sterilisation of minorities in the US is a known fact.
I’m reminded that forced sterilisation of minorities in the US is a known fact.
Thanks, I was completely unaware of this and I’ve seen a lot of documentation of NA atrocities.
Genocide doesn’t have to involve any direct killing. The problem isn’t that you fail to produce evidence of killing, it’s that you fail to produce any evidence of genocide at all.
Why is it that no muslim country in the world agrees with your assessment of this “genocide?” Why is it that the country which, in the 2010s, was dropping bombs on Uyghurs is now their greatest advocate? Doesn’t that sound a little fishy to you? Could it be that this is a lie fabricated to weaken the greatest enemy of the US? No, couldn’t possibly be. Back to believing everything US news says.
Hexbears deny the genocide against Uyghurs in China
Denial of the persecution of Uyghurs in China
human rights concerns in Xinjiang
China is treating its Uyghurs well.
Uyghurs in China are being oppressed.
It’s a weird thing to lead a discussion with the term “genocide”, and then use it interchangeably with all these others terms, getting noticeably less precise the deeper into your post.
Also:
They control what their citizens can see on the Internet, monitor every communication happening through their messaging apps, and often detains, without trial, dissidents who dare to call out the government for its wrongdoings.
This is America, lol.
Funny that even his source doesn’t say genocide anywhere. But he’s so adamant at using the word genocide.
I think a lot of people might think…well why does it matter anyway if the words aren’t being used right as long as it gets through to people? But I think from a social-scientific perspective, and from the PoV of actually wanting to eliminate genocide as a practice, it is important.
Let’s use a medical analogy. You cannot treat cancer without knowing exactly what cancer is-when something is cancer and when it’s something else, and the specific mechanisms through which cancer occurs and becomes fatal. If you are an activist and you see every serious ailment as cancer and go “we need to treat this cancer, now!” and people take you seriously, then you will not understand the cancer, nor know how to prevent/cure it.
It’s the same with genocide. You cannot have a “cure” or a “preventative technique” for genocide unless you study it. Study how it occurs, why it occurs-the specific causal factors that lead to political elites making the decision to commit genocide. For this-because we never have experimental conditions in the social sciences-we need to use comparison. We need to compare between cases to determine common factors that are specific (probabilistically rather than deterministically, in reality) to genocide. You need to be able to have a list of cases you can compare between to do this, and you need to be able to have a boundary within which these cases exist, and outside of which you can put everything as “not genocide”. If this boundary is wrong (e.g., if you put every case of persecution in the ‘genocide’ case list) then you’re going to end up msunderstanding every little thing about genocide, and you’ll never get any closer to figuring out how to stop it or prevent it.
Thus ipso facto making a political/activist call of ‘genocide!’ to get attention is actually extremely harmful, and it is a key part of the social scientist’s job to determine whether X or Y case can be considered genocide because, if we consider genocide an ontologically specific phenomenon (e.g., it has its own mechanisms and processes separate to that of, say, general repression), we need to keep false positives outside of our case list which will make it harder to uncover the causal logics of genocide in the first place.
Brb gonna do a Promethian solution to the world’s energy needs by harnessing the power of libs’ perpetually moving goalposts
There’s a major difference between a broken system that fails in many ways, and a system designed specifically to violate humans rights.
If you’re legitimately incapable of seeing this, then really it just proves how privileged a life you’ve lived.
I was trying to use different terms for the same thing so that my post does not become boring to read.
deleted by creator
The previous Hexbear thread was locked after an initial productive discussion, because the thread turned into nearly constant insults and attacks (and this from users of all instances, including lemm.ee). It was creating massive moderation workload, and I think locking the post was preferable to asking admins to spend huge amounts of free time on handling reports.
This post seems even more likely to devolve into the same kind of attacks, and if it does, then it will also be locked. Let me be clear that arguments over which government/media/researchers should be trusted are totally fine on lemm.ee, as long as these arguments don’t turn into name calling, abuse, and harassment.
OP: Please always report comments that harass you. If you find that community mods are not dealing with those comments, please stop participating in that community (for future reference, if such a community is on lemm.ee, please definitely also report the community to lemm.ee admins).
I know that walking away from an argument is extremely difficult, but in the threads you linked, there is an irreconcilable disagreement about which sources can be trusted, and most participants seem convinced that they have the full picture and know all the facts. I have a hard time remembering any time when such a discussion has lead to anything valuable. In fact, I think such discussions inevitably lead to the worst kind of low quality insults and trolling from some of the most aggressive posters in any community.
While I know there isn’t a consensus on this topic among lemm.ee users, I personally don’t think defederation is the correct approach, especially after reading through a lot of lemm.ee user comments about the topic recently. I think user-level instance blocking will solve the problem for most users who are not happy with this.
Just a side-note: the way some people casually throw around the insult “nazi” is completely ridiculous (and I don’t just mean hexbear users here - I’ve seen it from users of many instances - but it seems to almost always come up in any thread about hexbear). In my opinion, this only serves to weaken the memory of crimes against humanity that nazis committed. If anybody reading this finds that they often call others on Lemmy nazis, maybe have a deep think about whether you haven’t been participating in softening the meaning of “nazi”.
I’m legit sorry for all the drama and unpaid work the mods have to go through. Really.
Thank you, dear admin, for your timely and thoughtful reply.
This post seems even more likely to devolve into the same kind of attacks.
Yes, I completely agree. In fact, it seems like there are already signs of that happening.
OP: Please always report comments that harass you
Thank you. I will.
I know that walking away from an argument is extremely difficult, but in the threads you linked, there is an irreconcilable disagreement about which sources can be trusted
Irreconcilable indeed. I have learned my lesson from several fruitless arguments with them.
While I know there isn’t a consensus on this topic among lemm.ee users, I personally don’t think defederation is the correct approach
I see. I respect your decision.
the way some people casually throw around the insult “nazi” is completely ridiculous (and I don’t just mean hexbear users here)
Yeah! They are the ones diminishing the word nazi.
You are likewise diminishing the word “genocide”, which is why some users are coming down so hard on you, as you yourself document.
There’s an unclosed parenthetical about 0.6km into this post
OP, politics aside, it seems like you have a genuinely unhealthy obsession with having these arguments. If you don’t feel you’re getting any meaningful discussion or engagement out of those conversations, then stop.
Thanks. I will stop. In fact I planned for my post to be the final few hours I dedicate to those people.
Considering there is absolutely no scholarly consensus on Xinjiang (my very own former genocide studies teacher, Dr Jens Meierhenrich, does not consider it genocide, for example. He is not a ‘tankie’, he is an extremely well-regarded political scientist who has taught at the best universities in the world) being a genocide it is pretty silly to support defederating because of it. Adrian Zenz is not a valid researcher as he’s done no fieldwork, doesn’t speak any local language, is a Christofascist fundamentalist (look up some of the stuff he’s written about Jews), and his methodology + analysis is extremely poor. I’ve read through all his papers to see what the big deal was and I found it was completely unscientific and was just based on some very lousy correlations. The UN investigation simply did not find proof of genocide and did not claim to. It said there is evidence of human rights abuses which is something most will agree with.
I have no doubt there is genuine persecution + forced cultural assimilation against the Ughyur-I have a friend whose wife is an Ughyur who fled the region because of it-but there is simply not evidence of genocide.
No, I do not agree w/ most Hexbears on China because I do not believe it is democratic, but that doesn’t mean China’s political system is beyond discussion, does it?
People being rude and mean is not good and I do not suppor them. Hopefully Hexbear admins will ban them or whatever.
I think this does not constitute a valid reason for deferation whatsoever. It just feels like people are not open to seeing other opinions that they’re not used to.
Genocide in China: “Well sure there’s no actual evidence but you need to take seriously the idea that it could be happening anyway. This nazi guy has a lot of interesting things to say and I don’t think we should hold rabid white supremacy against a guy when he’s telling you about how evil the Asiatics are.”
The idea that you’re a nazi apologist can be gleaned just from a close reading of you complaining about being called a nazi apologist.
Buddy. You need to learn how to take an L in an argument without turning it into your whole personality.
I think instance level blocking from the user side is coming soon™, so that should help if you want to avoid us.
In general I don’t think taking internet arguments with strangers so seriously is helpful or healthy. And before I get accused of hypocrisy, I’ve called out dunk tank posts on hexbear for similar reasons.
The same Internet which helped an orange splash of color gain consensus? Or that influenced the Brexit result? Yeah, it’s irrelevant /s
I think a lot of hexbear users are obnoxious, immature dickheads that have been padded into an echo chamber of their own beliefs for a long time.
I don’t wanna defed from them though. A lot of the things they say make me go “wait fucking wat”, and on some level that’s a good thing
A lot of the things they say make me go “wait fucking wat”, and on some level that’s a good thing
Did you know that the US once tried to import hippos as a source of meat, as an alternative to cows?
Wait until you read about our indoor-outdoor cat wars
A lot of the things they say make me go “wait fucking wat”, and on some level that’s a good thing
Yeah, it’s good comedy.
I really don’t understand lemm.ee policy here. Hexbear is clearly a SPAM instance, but because they spam under the guise of leftist principles we’re just gonna let it slide. If explodingheads was this active and this toxic they would be de-federated 100%. Hexbear users brigade and spam every thread including this one. Being actively hostile, launching bad faith arguments. Don’t engage with these turds, just block and move on. We NEED instance blocking or lemmy is fucking toast.
This you?
The mandatory pronouns stay winning at weeding out reactionaries
big emojis
TC69 did nothing wrong and the pronoun option setting these types off without fail is a constant reminder of this.
She was so fucking right and we didn’t deserve her
Lmao 🤣
This thread is on active, no “brigade” necessary. Someone made a post about a funny element of the rant but deliberately excluded a link, username, and instance information.
So you’re fine with being federated with nazis as long as you can ignore them, but leftists who call you out on your transphobia is a step to far.
I don’t have any questions here, just stating what a despicable pile of dog vomit you are.
Isn’t there a genocide somewhere you should be out denying?
Being actively hostile… Don’t engage with these turds
We are openly hostile but only to bigots and bad faith posters. If we were hostile to you you probably deserved it.
what kind of mentality is this? “I’m being hostile to you because you deserve it.”
It comes from a disregard of Civility politics. So often Liberals will come to us with bad faith, poorly researched takes, and demand an argument.
Hexbear generally embodies a disrespect for the civility politics and bad faith concern trolls. As an instance we typically act as a single unified unit, which is rare for an online community.
It’s nothing personal, but a lot of the members are very well read in theory and history, and propagate that to other users with well sourced arguments. If someone comes in and demands that their propaganda based opinion is the only truth, some will try good faith reasoning. If that good faith attempt is lambasted as being a bot/troll/brigade after effort put in to educate, we’ll become hostile.
An internet argument is rarely for the participants, but for the people lurking through. Often times, this method is effective at getting people to question the generally accepted narrative.
I hope you have a good day and please consider logging off for a bit. It’s really nothing personal.
Does no one deserve hostility? I think there are many people who deserve hostile treatment. Are we to sit around and politely chat with nazis? No, fuck 'em, verbal abuse is the least they deserve.
Bigotry deserves nothing but chiding derision. Bad faith gets met with bad faith. How is that hard to understand?
“I’m being hostile to you because you deserve it.”
That isn’t what I said. Cause and effect can’t just be swapped around all willy-nilly like that. This is called gaslighting when its done intentionally but when its done unintentionally it can often be a sign of a personality disorder.
This is called gaslighting when its done intentionally but when its done unintentionally it can often be a sign of a personality disorder.
IDK, armchair diagnosing someone like this comes across as ableist.
Maybe a bit. Is it abelist to point at bones sticking out of someone’s leg and say “you might have a broken leg?” I’m not saying op does have a personality disorder but the causality switching thing is a red flag to me due to past situations.
Like I agree with most of that but the “This is called gaslighting when its done intentionally but when its done unintentionally it can often be a sign of a personality disorder.” is a bad take
I suppose the parallels to this being a shitty plagiarized version of “Iraq WMDs” from 20 years ago, conveniently involving a Muslim-majority province of China with known oil reserves above that of Iraq, major BRI routes running through it, deposits of lithium and other minerals, ETIM and ISIS activity (and known US involvement) until 2016, are all purely coincidental then?
Xinjiang was actually largely left behind and destitute until Xi Jinping became chairman in 2013. Widespread poverty and neighbouring Afghanistan under fire from US and UK bombings also didn’t help matters. Since then, according to the Xinjiang White Papers, there is no metric suggesting anything resembling a genocide. Wages, life expectancy, literacy, living standards have all increased. There is plenty of Uyghur culture on display in China, a HSR connects Xinjiang to the rest of China from the city of Urumqi (though a route should be alao extended to Aksu and Kashgar IMO) and they still learn not only their Uyghur language, but Mandarin on top of that, allowing them to better integrate with society at large. I’ve heard people say that Xinjiang has the best food, so there’s also that.
Oh and allegedly, the people in Xinjiang are among the most anti-West in China. If that’s true, gee I can’t imagine why…
Could you address the comments about the UN report? It claims severe human rights breaches and possible crimes against humanity. I’d be interested to hear an explanation.
Was on the way home and in the time, some good responses already. But on my take: Much of the world, including Muslim-majority nations, support China’s policies in Xinjiang and as predictable as posting pigpoopballs, the :international-community: “condemns” it. I think it’s also very telling when Isnotreal suddenly comes out of the woodwork “condemning” China’s actions in Xinjiang, literally while footage of Gaza getting bombed and journalists shot down is broadcast to every telly in Johannesburg.
Anyways, going through the UNHRC report, there is not one mention of “genocide”, “forced labour” is merely followed by “allegations of” and there is a passage on China ratifying laws abolishing the practice a decade ago. Even allegations of “crimes against humanity” is an ambiguous “may”. So in summary, it’s merely allegations and no conclusive findings. There is a critique on the UN report (as well as other topics related to Xinjiang) available on Qiao Collective.
Oh yeah, Rushan Abbas, the self-proclaimed Uyghur refugee was a guard at Guantanamo Bay, where she literally tortured prisoners, including a few Uyghurs in the mix. She was sniffed out on a :reddit-logo: AMA 5 years ago and basically got steamrolled by a CRH380A Hexie made out of dicks.
I’m really having difficulty in understanding your post (I don’t know what isnotreal, pigpoopballs or a CRH380A is). It seems that you’re saying that because the UN report was not definitive that crimes against humanity are being committed, all of its findings can be ignored?
The report is at best, “allegations” or “possible”. Nothing’s really definitive in it, as in no conclusive findings, yet it’s supported by western (mostly American) anti-China hawks. So yes, it could be ignored. As for the first part,
-
CRH380A is a high-speed train in China.
-
Isnotreal is a specific Apartheid ethostate that is occupying and terrorizing Palestine.
-
pigpoopballs is that image of a pig with a turd on it’s massive balls.
-
This comment addressed that pretty well.
Hexbear is a toxic shithole
So you stumbled into radically left wing instance, badly prepared and as soon as you encountered some sourced pushback ignored it and engaged in extremely hostile behaviour, yet it’s the hexbearians who were rude and should be defedded from?
Just look at your comment history, how much of it was actually defending your position and how much of it whining?
That’s not the whole story is it?
The problem is not the politics. It’s that I find myself having the same three arguments in ALL THREADS. If you want to complain about western imperialism in a as threads about geopolitics, knock yourself out. In a thread about cookies, maybe let this one go, just for once.
There are instances that have a posting culture that just doesn’t mesh well with others. Other instances are under no obligation to go and fetch their posts.