xyz@lemmus.org to World News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoJapan may take China to WTO over Fukushima-driven seafood import banwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.mlworldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up136arrow-down1external-linkJapan may take China to WTO over Fukushima-driven seafood import banwww.reuters.comxyz@lemmus.org to World News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.mlworldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squareKrachsterben@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAre they wrong though? I definitely wouldn’t want to eat that fish. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/24/fukushima-fish-with-180-times-legal-limit-of-radioactive-cesium-fuels-water-release-fears It’s already pretty telling that Japan is trying to export it when they’re a huge seafood consumer themselves to the point where they rely on imports Why want to get rid of Fukushima fish when it’s supposedly safe to eat?
Are they wrong though? I definitely wouldn’t want to eat that fish. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/24/fukushima-fish-with-180-times-legal-limit-of-radioactive-cesium-fuels-water-release-fears
It’s already pretty telling that Japan is trying to export it when they’re a huge seafood consumer themselves to the point where they rely on imports
Why want to get rid of Fukushima fish when it’s supposedly safe to eat?