• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Based on the earliest beliefs in Jesus, he was crucified in the firmament, not on earth. Makes sense for an apocalyptical sect of Jews (Essenes). John the Baptist (“Now John was clothed with camel’s hair and wore a leather belt around his waist and ate locusts and wild honey.”), Peter, and James the Just were all likely Essenes.

    Go check out those Dead Sea Scrolls and learn some things about the group that likely founded your faith before it got highjacked by Paul, who completely bastardized it.

    While you’re at it, learn about Marcion Sinope, the first to publish a New Testament.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Now John was clothed with camel’s hair and wore a leather belt around his waist and ate locusts and wild honey

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s the land of the dead but they did actually know about oil trapped in rock then, shale oil extraction specifically is first referenced in the 10th century by an Arab researcher.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s a bit late for the Talmud. Other ancient sources do at least mention the ground oozing gross oil sometimes, although use was limited without distillation, which also originated with the Arabs.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That’s just extraction from shale, we’ve been using ground seeps for most of human history. Sumerians were using oil and oil products and that’s like around 1000 years before the talmud.

  • cravl@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure the “waters above” are referring to clouds, not a fricking sky ocean. 😅 But yeah, Old Testament can sound weird without doing a lot of study to understand what the symbolism is. (Which I have done very little of, to be fair.)

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I mean, Ancient Hebrew knowledge of the water cycle was non-existent, because of course it was. They also reference springs just kind of bringing up ocean water for no reason like depicted in this. This isn’t like when they say “40” to mean a lot, and people claiming otherwise are probably selling something.

    • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well considering the main creation story in other nearby cultures at the time also say the world was originally all water, I’d imagine it isn’t so much symbolism as it is the fact that water falls from the sky occasionally and typically looks blue.

      The Enūma Eliš mentions that originally there was just water. Much like the creation story in Genesis the gods eventually separate the waters and expose land. Also curiously, the story is recorded across seven tablets and has a few more similarities with Genesis and other aspects of Judaism like man being a fallen creature (though due to man being made from the corpse of an evil god or because the gods were worried, not due to women lol)

      Also, the oldest creation story I’m aware of is The Sumerian Creation Myth which also references the “cosmic freshwater ocean” and says man lives in the lower region of this ocean. The noise of humanity annoys the main god so he sends the flood from the upper ocean. But one god warns a man of this so the man builds a boat and fills it with animals. Remind you of any bible story?

      Point is that even the Torah is a likely derivative work combining more ancient myths from other cultures. Because the original cultures reference the waters more as an actual physical ocean in a non-symbolic way, Id say the Bible story was meant to be literal. Almost all symbolism derived from the stories therein is likely interpretation only.

      I suppose the Hebrew scholars collecting these stories could have viewed them in a more symbolic way, but the first text I referenced is a few years younger than the Torah and still references oceans in a more physical way. So, I’d imagine their meanings were initially similar.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Ok, but clouds, damns, waters above, or sky oceans - why would anyone write down the sun & stars being in front of the clouds/sky river?

      Wouldn’t ppl reading that just like, you know, look up & go ‘well that’s not what I see, what else here is bs’?

  • Ŝan@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Cool, cool… So, when þe sun sets and rises… does it take a submarine þrough þe abyss, or a tunnel þrough þe Earth?

    • Two9A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Appreciate the commitment to use of the thorn, but you know þ and ð are different sounds, right?

      “þrough ðe Earþ” etc.

      • Ŝan@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        25 minutes ago

        By 1066, thorn had completely replaced eth for boþ sounds in English, and it remained so þrough þe Middle English period until moveable type and Belgian typesets, which didn’t come wiþ thorn. Þey did, however, come wiþ “Y” which looked like “Ƿ”, which is what thorn had been turning into. So “Ye Olde” was always pronounced “The Old”, “Y” standing in for thorn, which by þat point had been written for þe voiced dental fricative for centuries.

        TL;DR: Only in Icelandic, or before 1066, by which point thorn had completely replaced eth in English.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Unrelated: why do you use “þ” instead of “th”? I’ve seen a few of your comments and it always trips me up.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It was ðat English letter’s stated purpose to make a dental fricative sound, and I guess OP wants to bring it back. Which, honestly, would be cool.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So there’s oceans at the bottom and above us? Are we in some kind of bubble now? What happens if the firmament leaks water down into the bubble? Will it fill up, and where does the air go? Has the Waters above the firmament ocean a surface? And whats above that surface?

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Honestly if this were like Tolkien/LeGuin-style fantasy, it would be considered good lore !