My coworker is an idiot and can’t explain his own thoughts. Nice guy though.
He said he was reading and discovered that Ukrain started the Russian war by building a Dam that would starve a community of water. He didn’t know when or where, but was sure it was before any invading or annexing.
I can’t find any information on this. I’ve been googling and googling. Nothing. I can’t ask him for sources because if I get him going again he won’t stop.
Please help if you know anything.
He is probably referring to the North Crimean Canal which fed water into Crimea, Ukraine for crop irrigation. In 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine and occupied Crimea. Ukraine shut down the canal as they are under no obligation to provide water for crops in Russian occupied territory.
This canal was fed by water from Kakhovka Dam’s reservoir. However, Russia blew up this Ukrainian dam in 2023, which has since cut off all potential possibility to fill the canal until the dam can be rebuilt. Something that is not going to happen till after Russia’s invasion is stopped.
In summary, Russia invaded Ukraine, fucked a bunch of shit up, killed a ton of people, and is trying to pin the blame on Ukraine.
Thank you for the short explainer.
Hopefully OP is genuine and will come back and see this and then tell his “friend” he is an idiot.
Hey, I’m back. Tried to tell him Russia the started the war, but it he was so adamant about this dam. I had no knowledge of it was impossible to break through.
Probably not going to go back to my coworker, because I just can’t afford to open that can of worms. But I did genuinely need to know. I live in a disinformation riddled hotspot. I try to stay on top of the truth and the small truths bad actors sprinkle in the lies.
Well now you are armed with that info for next time. I too have trouble standing up to misinformation. It’s a problem where I won’t just spout things I haven’t verified and can source, no matter how true I THINK it is. It’s baffling how others can just howl into the nothing about things they heard somewhere and are positive it’s true.
Last time I was sure of a point during one of those sorts of discussions it was amazing to see the deflation in the room. “What do you mean?”
I mean you guys are idiots, here’s where you can verify that. I didn’t say that because neither of them seem that far gone, they are the helpful idiots. And suddenly the whining about being a victim of a non existent problem quieted down.
Rainbow
The North Crimean canal is absolutely what he was trying to talk about. He didn’t even know what or where Crimea was so it was tough to understand.
Thanks for the tldr and the links, that’s perfect. Appreciate the effort.
No problem, man! The annoying thing about disinformation is it spreads so easily. While attempting to tease out truth can take much, much more effort.
The biggest thing is teaching people how to be critical of what they hear and seek verification when something seems off. Problem is, once you get too far in, the truth is what seems off and it can take quite awhile to dig yourself back out, assuming you are even willing to try, which most aren’t.
lol 😂
I know two things to be true:
-
Russia started the war.
-
Your coworker is an idiot.
-
He is misinformed or deliberately revising history to fit his narrative. Ukraine’s damming of the canal was done after the annexing of Crimea, and in direct response to it. The other relevant dam, the Kakhovka Dam was built by the Soviets in the 1950s. It was destroyed (after a few failed attempts) by Russian demolition charges, though they continue to deny it.
There were arguments from Ukraine about the continued Russian occupation of their Sevastopol naval base in Crimea, which Ukraine wanted to end. That was the real provocation that Russia could not tolerate, but that is not so sympathetic of a story as saying the “Ukrainians cut off the water to the poor independence-minded Crimeans” /s
Of course, if someone is going to wholesale believe one side or the other I doubt there is any way of convincing them otherwise, but the facts simply do not fit the Russian narrative. If, indeed Ukraine “damming the canal” was such a great provocation that they had to start a war over it, why then did Russia subsequently destroy Kakhovka dam during said war which dried up the canal anyway? Of course they claim they did not, because it is a war crime, but it’s pretty absurd to pretend that Ukraine had the means to do it given the dam and surrounding area was very thoroughly under Russian control at all times.
That is absolutely what he was trying to talk about! Thank you!
It was shut down after Russia invaded in 2014 and was only %18 of the drinking water supply.
I really appreciate the effort you put in to get me that information.
Don’t downvote a genuine question… 😟
Thank you, the answers have been massively helpful. I appreciate the vote of confidence.
No Putin’s interest was provoked when President Clinton removed the nukes from Ukraine.
Is your coworker Donald Trumpf?
Not Trump himself, but he’s a big fan, facebook tells him to be.
I mean you can go around his probably fake thing by just saying none of this deserves 2 years of wars and dead civilians.
Yeah, that was essentially where it was left at. He said Ukraine broke a contract with russia (he ad pivoted to the NATO encroachment defense of the war) and I said even if there was a valid contract that legally justified war, it wouldn’t morally justify killing Ukrainians and displacing them from their homes.
That is the impasse we left it at.
(he ad pivoted to the NATO encroachment defense of the war) and I said even if there was a valid contract
Two things about this ‘NATO encroachment’ angle people like to bring up:
-
There was never an agreement that NATO cannot accept new members. Even Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union, the person whom the agreement would have been made with, calls such a claim a myth.
-
One has to ask why countries want to join NATO. It is something they have to apply for, something they have to work for. Why do they want this security guarantee? Who are they afraid of?
It’s Russia. It’s Russia invading everyone around them that has pushed countries to join NATO. Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine have all been occupied by Russia. Is it a wonder why former Soviet states like Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania so badly want protection from Russian invasion? Is it a wonder why NATO accepted two new members, Sweden and Finland, after the second Russian invasion of Ukraine?
-
It’s pretty telling if “the death of civilians is bad” amounts to an impasse/agree to disagree situation
“Ukraine started the Russian war by building a Dam that would starve a community of water” is a statement that has no basis in fact.
That which can be stated without evidence can be countered without evidence.
Thank you for the confirmation, I appreciate it.
Removed by mod
It sounds like OP is asking where this talking point comes from in order to counter it effectively.
I don’t think the post is in bad faith and it fits the purpose of this community. It’s possible that OP is a troll, but their user history doesn’t give that impression and neither does the body of the post.
The title could have been better
Thank you.
I am in fact looking for the root of this disinformation my coworker has read. It was driving me crazy not being able to find any sources.
Most of these lies are based on something with some truth. I find flat out rejecting them makes no progressin the discussion, but explaining the true context works much better.
