• sleen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    OP doesn’t understand what cultural progression is. Of course different people gonna do stuff differently as time progresses, the class she was when you where in high school is just irrelevant.

    This is the case where op just has skill issue, and is stuck in the past like a boomer he is.

  • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m 34 dating a 25 year old myself. Which I checked, it passes the “Half your age plus 7” test

    (34 / 2 = 17 + 7 = 24) Sometimes I still feel weird about it though

    • ethaver@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      @ 30 22 feels waaay too damn young. tf am I even gonna talk to this person about? I’m a decade in to a high stress high reliability industry. I’m starting to get Greg grey hairs! I make jokes about all the child rapists I met while working for the state! Too much happened in that 8 years between us. Too damn much.

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Wow that actually makes sense.

      But then again, I’m born 1994, there’s not so many I can actually date. I have like 1990 - 1998 available, and they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together: those younger are TikTok addicted, those older are Facebook-relicts. I’m in limbo where I know all of that but don’t like anything.

      Edit: to those who downvoted, why?

      • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 hours ago

        to those who downvoted, why?

        Because of this part:

        they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Just for a little context, the minimum age being ((your age / 2)+7) is meant to be “this is the minimum age of someone you can date without it being creepy” (i believe it originated from the TV show how i met your mother)

        If you were born in 1994 you are either 30 or 31. Let’s call it 30 for easy math.

        30/2 = 15 15+7=22

        So anyone who is 22 or older fits the minimum age concept, which is anyone born in approx 2002/2003 or earlier. If you decided to include that, the extra 4-5 years does increase the dating pool quite a bit.

        I’m not telling you who to date, just giving a little context to the math since that’s what was brought up in the original comment.

        • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Invert this rule to get the maximum age you can date (defined as the person whose minimum age is your current age):

          min age = (your age / 2) + 7 max age = (your age * 2) - 14

          If you’re 30, then you can reasonably date people between 22 and 46. So the other guy can add even more years before 1990.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Also, for the maximum age they are the younger one. So assuming age is 30, substract 7 and multiply the outcome by 2, maximum date age is 46…

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 hours ago

          (i believe it originated from the TV show how i met your mother)

          Although the provenance of the rule is unclear, it is sometimes said to have originated in France.[81] The rule appears in John Fox Jr.'s 1903 novel The Little Shepherd of Kingdom Come,[84] in American newspapers in 1931 attributed to Maurice Chevalier,[85] and in The Autobiography of Malcolm X, attributed to Elijah Muhammad.[86]

          In many early sources, the rule was primarily presented as a formula to calculate the ideal age of a female partner at the beginning of a heterosexual relationship. Frederick Locker-Lampson’s Patchwork from 1879 states the opinion “A wife should be half the age of her husband with seven years added.”[87] Max O’Rell’s Her Royal Highness Woman from 1901 gives the rule in the format “A man should marry a woman half his age, plus seven.”[88]

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_disparity_in_sexual_relationships

  • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Maybe OP could date a 9 year old on the side, to fill the age gap. Or is OP not rich enough to pull that of?