• optional@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      475 kcal

      Not so hard to calculate. It’s still stupid though, that they don’t have to print the values per 100g, as they do in Europe. That makes it really easy to compare two products with different package sizes.

      The value per serving is mostly useless, as a serving is just some made up amount, usually tiny to make the product look healthier. For example, a serving size of crisps could be 20g, which is not even a handful.

        • optional@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Oz or whatever strange body part comparison you guys prefer would also be fine for me. As long as it’s standardized between products.

          With 100 gramms/millilitres it’s a simple guideline:

          • <100 kcal: probably healthy
          • 100-200 kcal: mostly ok
          • >200 kcal: consume carefully

          Of cause it’s fine to consume oils (~700kcal/100ml) but they shouldn’t be the major part of your meal. And sugary drinks are obviously bad for you, even though they’ve got less than 100kcal/100ml.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      475 calories

      There’s 2.5 servings per bag, the serving size is listed as 2tbsp, there’s 190 calories in 2tbsp. So calories in the entire bag is just 2.5 * 190 calories