• HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 小时前

    AI was never meant to benefit the working class in any capacity.

    Its a great rule of thumb that if you see oligarchs hype up something and push for it to be everywhere, its a BAD fucking thing.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 小时前

      Meanwhile the average CEOs decision making could be replaced by a goldfish in a tank with some arbitrary object detection code.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 小时前

      Resource drain of LLMs inescapably makes them tools availiable only to big players. They are ideal in the way they are naturally gated. Making them mandatory == giving these select companies and people power over everything. And not only oligarchs’ promotion, but the whole situation of them being given for free or cheap at a huge loss gives one an idea that there’s a lot to milk from it’s growing adoption.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 小时前

        But that’s completely not true! Like, not a single thing you said is even slightly correct!

        LLMs are relatively cheap to run - at small scales. You can run an LLM on your own computer right now. It won’t be super fast, it won’t have super skills, but you can run it, and you can train it yourself.

        Massive LLMs like ChatGPT require tremendous resources precisely because they are not just tools available only to big players. Everybody on the planet has access to them - for free. The only actual difference there is between running an LLM locally and through a provider is that you get better speed and (sometimes, depending on context) better training through a provider.

        As for “there’s a lot to milk from its growing adoption” - maybe? Probably? Who knows? That’s the “magic” of the AI bubble we’re experiencing right now - the big players keep saying that it will “make work and money obsolete”, that “anyone will be able to do anything”, that “a time of post-scarcity approaches”, and a billion other bullshit marketing slogans like that. But the reality is that nobody has yet figured out how to make money on that thing.

        Right now, the only reason it’s “growing”, is because of the weird and probably illegal circular financing that’s going on at the very top - Nvidia invests in OpenAI, which invests in Oracle, which invests in Nvidia - and so on. No money is actually being made or (often) even changing hands, but everyone can now show they’ve received a lot of investment which pumps up their stock prices. The only reason this hasn’t popped yet is probably because the main investing parties are using tonnes of cash they had stored.

        Growing adoption means nothing. It’s a marketing tool for them to keep shareholders happy while they keep a literal investing circlejerk going, every now and again inviting another player into the fold.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 小时前

      I knew there was something wrong when we started getting positive metrics based on how much we leveraged AI.

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 小时前

    this seems incredibly short sighted… the current situation exists because there is a large amount of infrastructure and data centres being built. once that infrastructure is built, the demand will return to normal… OR once the bubble bursts, the market will be flooded with used ram from failed data centres… aliexpress will be selling ram at a dollar a gig when all these data centres flop

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 小时前

      The unfortunate part for DIY PC is that the RAM is likely all buffered ECC. And used flash is sketchy in my experience, even if you buy SLC where the whole point is supposed to be that it is more durable.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 小时前

      I don’t think the bubble will burst like we are used to. AI is part of the arms race between nations. So they will shore the industry up at all costs.
      As for the choice to shut down the brand. It will be years before all that infra gets built. Better to sit the time out and revive the brand when prices are reasonable enough that hobbyists and such are willing to pay them.

    • phar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 小时前

      Yeah but you have a company that has people to pay and rent to pay etc. If they don’t have enough liquid money to handle it then well here we are

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 小时前

    So their not shutting down, just focusing on AI idiots until the bubble busts and then they will turn back to consumers…

    Rules of Acquisition #1,261-- Always fuck over the idiots in the market. And when you’ve taken all their money, go back to your base with inflated prices.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    Translation, Micron is shutting down Crucial for short term shareholder value at the cost of a sustainable and proven long term brand and channel.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 小时前

          Depends on how proud they are and if they’d want to retract their statements of going after AI instead of consumers or not.

          • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            20 小时前

            I don’t think there’s any pride in it, they are just going after what is the most profitable at any given time.

            That’s exactly why I suspect they will choose to resurrect the Crucial name later, because given a choice between launching a new name nobody knows, or a name people recognise (even if it’s been tarred a bit) then recognised will be the winning and more profitable option.

            That is, if they haven’t sold the Crucial name to someone else first.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 小时前

      It’s not just for shareholder value, like a downsize or stock buyback would achieve. This will literally fill their coffers to the brim faster than staying in the consumer market. Also the consumer market won’t go away anytime soon and there are very few competitors to begin with. They can just return to the consumer market once the AI bubble has burst like nothing has changed. Only difference is they will have way more money in the bank than if they never left.

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 小时前

        Ask Intel how well compromising long term product development for short term gain is working now. How is their bank balance looking now?

        You also cant just pick it up from scratch again. The people are gone, the relationships are gone and people who trusted your brand to build their businesses have gone elsewhere.

        I swear businesses are run like political parties these days, they simply dont care about anything beyond the next cycle.

  • Velypso@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    I built a god rig in 2022, i bought the best 64gb ddr5 4-stick ram kit i could, an nvidia 4090, the best processor i could, and attached it to the best mobo i could.

    I spent about 4800.

    My pc is now worth about 6500.

    This is some crazy ass shit. Never should a pc appreciate in value.

    What the hell is going on???

    • witten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 小时前

      Your point still stands, but don’t forget basic inflation. $4,800 in 2022 is like > $5,300 now.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 小时前

        And haven’t even achieved AI yet. What we call “AI” is still nothing more than an upjumped calculator.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 小时前

          Their fucking calculator can’t even calculate. Big fucking whoop.

          And people keep shovelling money in their bottomless maw. The world is mad.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            21 小时前

            To quote a recent post “we taught computers to talk like middle managers and assumed that meant computers were sentient, rather than assuming that middle managers aren’t”

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 小时前

      When you hear people say they hate AI, it’s for more reasons than AI slop, energy consumption, and beating the damn term into every product line you can imagine for little to no benefit.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 天前

      I bought a fairly good custom build in April of this year for A$3218.

      The same approximate build now costs A$4783 on their website.

  • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 小时前

    I just installed a 4TB nvme Crucial SSD in my new build solely to put games on.

    I’m sure they will come crawling back to consumers after the AI bubble bursts.

    • starblursd@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 小时前

      Same here… I’m so glad I upgraded when I did… I did a panic upgrade last December… just look into a better GPU now

  • Dawn_Vibration@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    AI is really ruining fucking everything. The enviorment, entertainement, music, art, jobs, reality, freedom / privacy / rights.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 天前

      No, corporate greed is ruining everything with AI.

      Because you know if they built a super-AI that give them perfect instructions on how to build Earth into a paradise, but it would require they give up 1/4 of their wealth, they’d be reaching for the reset button before it finished printing them out…

      • Xenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        They don’t even need that. current AI will tell them that. They’ve actually ran these questions and they ignore the answer every time

        • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 小时前

          Elon has to keep “dewoking” Grok. Sure, it’s still an awful model, probably the most disinformative, but it’s funny that it keeps revering back to neutral or pro progressive values, while calling out Elon

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 天前

      The fact people are blaming the tech rather than the tech bros is a big part of why this keeps happening.

      Its the decision of real people that make this situation suck.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 小时前

        Indeed.

        I have a model running locally on my NAS that does image recognition for photos in my Immich app (think Google Photos, but private). It does a decent job and runs well on AMD integrated graphics on a Ryzen 5 3400G. I just search for [daughter’s name], and there she is.

        I use Firefox’s translation feature (that also runs locally and can run on low end hardware).

        My sister is blind and uses an AI assisted screen reader that works way better than what she was using before.

        The issue isn’t AI/machine learning in itself, it’s this tech bro arms race. It’s them manipulating models to push agendas. It’s them shoehorning an LLM into every fucking Google query. It’s them telling companies they can fire all their staff and rely on LLMs.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 天前

        Yeah but we can’t possibly hold people accountable for the actions of their company, think of the shareholders!

        • hayvan@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 天前

          Capitalism is the biggest religion of today, and it’s su successful it can coexist with a lot of other religions.

          It’s not AI destroying the environment and making us miserable, it’s th pursuit of profit. It’s not “corporate greed” sucking us dry. Corporations are greedy by design under Capitalism, that’s the whole point. It’s not bad CEOs making evil decisions. It’s the system that allows such wealth and power to exist.

          All of those problems are systemic, not bad people making bad decisions. Treating capitalism like law of nature won’t fix anything.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 天前

      And it will burst and mostly disappear, taking with it half the economy, thousands of jobs, and become a military industrial complex blackbox tax sponge, the worst of all possible outcomes.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 小时前

      Haven’t seen it put any more concisely. It’s true though. I really really hope some AI bubble pops soon…

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      But on the other hand, it’s really polite about me knowing nothing about anything, so I think we should invest all the money on Earth into it.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      21 小时前

      A fun reminder that during the pandemic, before AI, there was a backlog in new cars because all the crucial chips were unavailable due to an increase in bullshit like wifi enabled toasters.

      It has nothing to do with AI. Consumers are asking for this shit and companies are delivering.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 小时前

        Customers aren’t asking for this shit. The issue is that companies don’t seem to try to deliver products customers want anymore. Instead they hop on some bullshit trend to try to appeal to investors to buy their stocks to pump it up because they want to show they are the next big thing in innovation.

        • BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 小时前

          Maybe but most consumers, but I’m not. I don’t have a smart toaster or fridge or even tv (I bought a dumb panel, it was cheaper). I honestly hate all of that so called smart bs. “Smart” tvs take longer to turn on than my dumb panel. And cost more. For features I literally don’t want.

          But yeah, to each their own!

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 小时前

            Its hard to find a non smart TV these days. Its present even in the cheapest TV at the retail outlet.

            How long ago did you buy a dumb panel to even be able to find one? Only dumb panels I’ve found have been PC monitors.

            Once you start shopping for LG, Samsung, Sony, TCL, etc everything is a smart TV. And lot of people buy TVs based on specs like HDR quality, latency, and frame output and those TVs usually come as a smart TV whether you want it or not.

      • Alaik@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 小时前

        No one is asking for ads on their fridge. You are really underestimating the cartel like behavior of business in general now.

  • scala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 小时前

    Shits wild the same ram I bought over a year ago is 400% more for half the amount of GB.

    • Buffy@libretechni.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 小时前

      Yeah I love current RAM prices, running a memtest right now – 75k errors and counting. I’m really excited to go buy some more, can’t wait.

  • MrSilkworm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 小时前

    Business don’t care about consumers because nowadays business sell to other business

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 小时前

      Nowadays? It’s always been the case. It’s far easier and less hassle to sell to or work for other businesses. I run an IT service company and I avoid residential work line the plague. It can sometimes make me more money, but over all it is horrible as opposed to work done for other companies.

      • AldinTheMage@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 小时前

        I’ve talked with people in HVAC who have said the same. It’s much easier to provide a service to a business than random individuals.

        However, this is different, as this is just a retail product. Micron doesn’t have to deal with the person who doesn’t pay after the job is done, or doesn’t lock their dog up because “he doesn’t bite, it will be fine” and it turns out to be an aggressive monster. This is just assembly line production that they already are set up to do.

        I get that they have a limited number of inputs and they are just choosing to make as much money as possible. It sucks to see that go, though. Crucial has always been my go-to for RAM.

        • titanicx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 小时前

          Well if you think about it this way there’s also less packaging involving b2b. You don’t have to sell to a middleman who then will resell it. You can just sell at the higher price point to start with and you can have a whole lot less packaging involved and then just provide it straight out to the company. You also selling both which gets you a larger amount at once so rather than having to stockpile and everything like that. There’s a whole lot of other factors that go in selling B2B for even a retail company as opposed to selling retail.

    • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 小时前

      As someone who spent the majority of the '10s with a similar rig as you described, make sure you work nights and have an SO that tolerates whatever nonsense you are blathering about when she gets home.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    231
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    I am really beginning to fucking hate AI. Like, before I just didn’t care for it, it just wasn’t really my interest. But now I’m really beginning to fucking despise that shit and I really can’t wait to see the “AI economy” completely fucking destroyed.

    • hayvan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      AI even ruined AI. Up until this insane hype train, ML models were specialized tools to achieve their tasks. Now the whole field is dominated by LLMs and slopgen bullshit.

      • BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 小时前

        A lot of top researchers have already moved on from transformers.

        Yann LeCun, Meta’s longtime chief AI scientist, quit and said LLMs are a “dead end” because scaling text-only models can’t produce real intelligence, and he’s not the only one who thinks so. Lots of engineers understand the limitations of LLMs.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 天前

        Yeah that’s the annoying thing. Generative AI is actually really useful…in SPECIFIC situations. Discovering new battery tech, new medicines, etc. are all good use cases because it’s basically a parrot and blender combined and most of these things are rehashes if existing technologies in new and novel ways.

        It is not a fucking good solution for a search engine replacement to ask “Why do farts smell?”. It uses way too much energy for that and it hallucinates bullshit.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 天前

          Yeah. They solved protien folding with ML a few years back. And I like using it for things like noise removal in Lightroom.

          But so much of it has been focused on useless (at best) bullshit that I just want the bubble to burst already.

          • piconaut@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 天前

            I agree with the general sentiment here but just wanted to clarify that they definitely didn’t “solve protein folding” yet. Alpha fold is a significant improvement in structure prediction and it generated a lot of hype but some of the structures I’ve seen it put out are total nonsense.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 小时前

          It’s good for optimisation problems, where you have a complex high-dimensional space to search and you’re solving for some measurable quality.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 小时前

        There was already a lot of ML bullshit from the big data bubble ~ 2010 and before ChatGPT, together with all of the fuss about data scientists. But now it’s a 100 times worse.

    • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      So far, AI has cost me a few hobbies (as in, made them a lot less enjoyable) and one job.

      If there’s an uprising against clankers, you’ll find me at the front lines.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        78
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        Your enemy is, as usual, billionaires and their fanboys. Clankas don’t exist as a separate thing, they are tools of the wealthy to further oppress the common folk.

        • BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 小时前

          Correct. Even many engines say LLMs are a waste of time:

          Yann LeCun, Meta’s longtime chief AI scientist, quit and said LLMs are a “dead end” because scaling text-only models can’t produce real intelligence

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 天前

          When the robot uprising happens, using a soft a in clanka instead of a hard er on clanker isn’t going to save you. We’re all fucked.

    • MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      exactly how i feel. literally said something very similar to my wife last night. I fucking hate AI. I think activist group are going to starting popping up hard against it. And if they aren’t already, they really should. This shit is destroying our world. The only people this is helping is billionaires.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 天前

        Capitalism is destroying the world. We need to rise up against that. The AI bullshit is just one manifestation of the whole world being geared to serve capital and the handful of people that control it.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        They’ll cheat us out of that too. Chip manufacturers will pay and coerce and liquidators and retailers to shovel all the surplus into the ocean to keep prices high.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      265
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 天前

      What I’m becoming worried about now is all these corporations now realizing that they can simply supply price the average consumer out of owning electronics or any kind of compute. And locking them into renting or leasing access to data center compute and keeping the power of information further consolidated in corporate interests.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 天前

          That out of context quote takes a lot of shit for something that was supposed to represent a futuristic socialist utopia.

          The idea was that 14 years after that article was published, mankind would have such immediate access to services and those services would be free, that people would just sorta stop caring about owning things. For example, since food and necessities would be free, you could go home and print your dinner. If you wanted someone else to cook, you’d get something delivered. But, if you wanted to try something truly novel that most people don’t do anymore in this society, you could rent kitchen equipment and it’d be ready as soon as you need it, and you’d use socialized appliances and utensils. Why? Because your home doesn’t need that clutter. If you wanna cook all the time, you can own whatever you want. But most people will want to use that space for something else, so they’ll just print their meals.

          You would have quick and easy access to transport, so why waste the money and space to own a car? You wanna drive? Push a button in your app and a car arrives for free. Or take the free train or bus.

          The essay isn’t about “you won’t be able to own anything,” it’s about “you won’t want to own anything, but you’ll have everything you could ever want or need.”

          And we’re really headed in the right direction for this amazing future. Except, you know… Corporations are bleeding us dry instead of supporting us…

          • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 小时前

            That does sound lovely, but like every other utopia it’s a fantasy. It’s got the same fatal issue as every other utopia - people. A person can be good and decent, but people suck. I’d say the modern use of that quote is more accurate to reality than the rose tinted view of its origin.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 小时前

            The link doesn’t work for me.

            Even if the initial intention is positive, I think this degree of dependency on external services is not realistic even if mega corps were not as bad as they are currently.

          • Emi@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 小时前

            Thank you. This is the first version I heard so I was confused why it’s bad and people being against it.

      • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        82
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        Holy cow that’s a very real danger I hadn’t thought of! The industry needs a new trend to reuse all this capacity they built, because AI will likely scale back as many startups fail to reach profit.

        Renting your home computer might be the next trend, and it could be gratis at first so people get used to it. Why spy on users when you can actually own their computers?

      • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        Aren’t we already seeing that though?

        The vast majority of people who surf the web don’t use a computer to do it. People who do belong to niches. People over a certain age grew up with and still buy computers. People who game still buy computers or consoles. People who stream/create content still use computers and other electronics for that purpose, same with like. Engineers and hobbyists using CAD and other software in creative spaces.

        But the smart phone has overtaken the computer as a personal computing device by quite a large margin now. And at every turn companies are trying to make cell phones a den of ad service, slop, and addictive content while stealing any user data that’s not nailed down to increase their revenue and continue the circle.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 小时前

          with being a walled garden i have a feeling we will eventually see phones become genuinely free because you will not have an option to keep your data away from advertisers. AOSP is barely holding on to maintain a safe place for users. when all hardware is locked down we will be stuck.

          • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 小时前

            I’m assuming you mean that phone software will be free, because phones (while they can be heavily subsidized) aren’t free and are getting up to ridiculous prices. I own a phone that retails for $1000. That’s a ridiculous price for a phone. Except that phones now are just very tiny personal computers.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        I hope it means the return of old, old hardware and the software that comes along with it. This is why projects like collapseOs are important.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        theyd have to all collorbate to make that happen though, which is really unfeasable on their end. a BUNCH of companies will go under if they cannot sell product. they arent going to willingly take losses for the sake of a different company.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 天前

          No but I do hold onto old electronics because I grew up with my grandparents and they had WW2 wartime rationing mentality about saving everything. Also my grandfather also an incredibly cheap bastards at times too

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 天前

        I hope they do, it will just break stuff more and people will be more likely to go with Linux and open source software. My 10 year old computer still is super fast if it’s not bloated.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      First it was GPUs because crypto, then this. Wonder what useless thing the tech bros will cover up with in a few years!

      • lividweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        96
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        Article in 2027:

        Keyboard prices soared this month, as tech giants pivoted from failed AI projects to employing hordes of monkeys typing randomly. One CEO was quoted as saying, “Just a few trillion more dollars, and I think our random typing model could reproduce the lost contents of the Library of Alexandria.”

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 天前

      Good luck…

      Even when the bubble bursts, they’re going to have an insane amount of computing power just sitting there, it will get sold off in bankruptcy proceedings, and some company will gobble it up and operate at a loss while continuing to secure future supply contracts.

      There’s a very real chance that we’re witnessing the slow death of home computing.

      The way things shake out it might end up being prohibitively expensive compared to cloud computing, and once that’s the norm they price gouge like Walmart did to destroy small businesses.

      Instead of dropping a couple grand for a PC every couple years, we’ll have steady contracts paying for month at a time indefinitely.

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 天前

        Nah. Web devs will create even more bloated web pages to keep home computing in business.

        For real though, most people don’t need that much computing power, and we reached the plateau 12 years ago. That’s why we’re seeing crypto and AI grifts happen. They recentralize decentralized systems. The elites are striking back.

        You know the saying“information wants to be free; information wants to be expensive”? This is the expensive part where people try to horde knowledge by making it inaccessible to everyday people.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        Those GPUs fry themselves in a year or two, and utility prices will put pressure on governments to concept datacenters

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 小时前

      If the AI bubble bursts most of the western world will be thrown into deep recession again and I hope we don’t get a repeat of 2008 just for cheap RAM or GPUs

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 小时前

        It’s already there for most of us. It only a few rich companies getting richer that’s making the line go up.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      I think it’s a lost cause. Essentially both crypto and AI were big because someone figured out how to offload shit to a GPU efficiently. There’s probably a ton of other appllications for GPUs we haven’t even tapped.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        I’ve got this crazy idea where we can use GPUs to render 3D scenes efficiently.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 天前

        Serial compute isn’t doing the double-every-18-months-in-speed since something like the early 2000s.

        Unlike with serial compute, not all problems can be solved, run faster, with parallel compute. But at some point, unless we figure out some sort of new way to play with physics, we pretty much have to move to parallel compute where we can if we want much more performance.